lint code

[tastelikefeet]

Change Summary

Related issue number

Checklist

• The pull request title is a good summary of the changes - it will be used in the changelog
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Run pre-commit install and pre-commit run --all-files before git commit, and passed lint check.
• Documentation reflects the changes where applicable

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @tastelikefeet, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is dedicated to improving the code style and readability within the agent.py file by applying standard linting practices. The changes are purely cosmetic, focusing on formatting and line breaks to ensure consistency and maintainability without introducing any functional modifications.

Highlights

• Code Formatting: Applied linting rules to projects/singularity_cinema/compose_video/agent.py to enhance code readability and adhere to established style guidelines.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request applies linting fixes to the code. While most changes are stylistic, one of the line breaks in a conditional statement harms readability. I've provided a suggestion to improve the formatting for better clarity and maintainability, adhering to common Python style conventions (PEP 8).

[gemini-code-assist]

While this line break is syntactically correct, it harms readability by splitting the len() function call. According to PEP 8, the preferred way to wrap long lines is by using Python's implied line continuation inside parentheses. This approach is much cleaner and more readable.

Suggested change

	if duration is not None and i < len(
	subtitle_paths) and subtitle_paths[i]:
	if (duration is not None and i < len(subtitle_paths)
	and subtitle_paths[i]):

References

1. PEP 8, the style guide for Python code, recommends using implied line continuation within parentheses for long lines to improve readability. The current formatting, which breaks a line inside a function call, is less clear than wrapping the entire conditional expression. ^(link)