Skip to content

docs: sync #112 complexity budget, tracing CI, and passive phases - #117

Draft
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/engineering-documentation-updates-86f9
Draft

docs: sync #112 complexity budget, tracing CI, and passive phases#117
cursor[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/engineering-documentation-updates-86f9

Conversation

@cursor

@cursor cursor Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Documentation-only sync so operator docs match current main after #112 (and the already-merged #102/#104/#107 surfaces).

Docs added/updated

  • README.md — architecture, quality gate, Laminar section, troubleshooting; passive phase map
  • AGENTS.md — toolchain, suite counts, complexity ownership, passive phases
  • SPEC.md (S20 / S22), EVALUATION.md (S20 / S22), BUILDPLAN.md (T21 / T23)
  • docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-15-tech-debt-cicd-routine-design.md — two CI jobs + checkout depths

Codepaths covered

Knowledge gaps addressed

Notes

Verification

  • Re-read complexity_gate.py, pyproject.toml, .github/workflows/ci.yml, passive.py
  • uv run pytest -q → 748 passed / 4 skipped
  • uv sync --extra tracing && uv run pytest -q → 749 passed / 3 skipped
Open in Web View Automation 

Align operator docs with current main after #112: DEFAULT_THRESHOLD is
the sole complexity budget (no inert mccabe decoration), the CI tracing
job is documented, and the dev group no longer lists logfire (#104).
Also map passive.py's named phase helpers from #107 and note the
shallow checkout on the tracing lane.

Co-authored-by: Michelle Rojas <mrojas54@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant