Repair check_estimator battery; add mask and conformance coverage - #9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The conformance battery failed on every estimator (repr-with-params compared against Regressor/Classifier suffixes; sklearn's own LinearRegression wouldn't pass), mask utils and check_estimator had ~10% coverage, and MultiOutput wrappers rejected nested estimator__params that get_params emitted. Fixes: class-name check without suffix rule, repr-normalized params round-trip, base re-exports utils check (single source), estimator__param support on MultiOutput pair; 21 new tests (mask utils, 14-estimator battery). Follow-up noted: OneVsRestClassifier still lacks nested params. Local: 302 passed, pre-commit clean.