chore: add MIT license - #4
Open
nadaamd wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The repo had no license, which legally means nobody may reuse the code — an odd default for a project whose README invites people to run it. Same MIT text and copyright holder already used in Mole-Hunt-Trading-Game. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Umbra had no LICENSE file, which legally means nobody may reuse the code — an odd default for a project whose README walks the reader through running it.
Same MIT text and copyright holder already in use in
Mole-Hunt-Trading-Game(verified byte-identical), so the two repos stay consistent.🤖 Generated with Claude Code