Conversation
… events Signed-off-by: Maximilian Martin <maximilian_martin@gmx.de>
max65482
requested review from
GVodyanov,
SebastianKrupinski and
tcitworld
as code owners
September 26, 2026 14:28
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
SebastianKrupinski
requested changes
Sep 27, 2026
SebastianKrupinski
left a comment
SebastianKrupinski
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @max65482
These changes where are design choice not a over sight. This was done to comply with the RFC
Contributor
Author
|
I agree it is a valid UI design choice. I just found it a bit counterintuitive. |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This brings back the possibility to edit and delete first occurrences of recurring events. This feature was removed with #7600.
Fixes #8990 and fixes #8991.
The current behavior (treating the first event as the whole series) can be considered valid as well. It reflects the mechanism described in RFC 5545.
🤖 AI (if applicable)