[finding] the sdui-parser lockstep has drifted again since the record was taken: objectui carries 26 diagnostic codes, this copy 24 — `inert-quick-add` and `member-type-mismatch` exist only on the renderer side

[os-tesla]

os-decision-facets

① 项目长远合理性:不变量写的是「两份拷贝在诊断码上逐字节一致」;补齐缩小特例(恢复不变量),声明允许的不对称则是契约增生 —— 每多一个被声明的例外都是永久义务。⇒ 指向补齐。
② 实际业务拉动:今天零人撞上 —— 门禁现在是绿的(实测 exit 0,24 码,pin 53ded82bf7a4 自立卡起 5 天未动)。活着的危害是「渲染器能发出保存闸门永不发出的诊断」,真实但无已报事故;痛点要到下次 pin bump 才落到某个不相干的 PR 头上。⇒ 零拉动,默认 defer 或 remove。
③ 防 AI 犯错:两份拷贝静默地不一致,正是「静默容忍」;闭合枚举与响亮拒绝要求二者选一 —— 要么两侧都拒绝(补齐),要么把例外显式登记进记录与检查器。⇒ 反对「什么都不做且不记录」。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:声明一条「允许的不对称」是 declare-and-maintain;补齐是 remove 掉分歧本身。⇒ 指向补齐。

Prior rulings read: sdui-lockstep,diagnostic code,objectui port,lockstep drift → 0 hits; none

推荐:A。 自检「只看①选 A;②③④ 是否翻转:③④ 同向 A,只有 ② 反向」——② 会翻转结论,当且仅当那两个码确实是渲染器专属的。而那正是本席从这个容器里答不出的事实问题。

• A — 两个码都补齐到本仓 packages/sdui-parser,恢复逐字节一致。
• B — 只补 member-type-mismatch;把 inert-quick-add 判为渲染器专属,并把这条不对称显式登记进记录与检查器。
• C — 两个都不补,把二者都判为渲染器专属并显式登记。
• D — 推迟到下次 pin bump 被迫面对。⚠️ 代价已被本卡测出:届时红的是一个与此毫无关系的 bump PR,而成因已六天。

置信缺口:objectui 未在本容器检出。 本席只复算了本仓一侧(7 源文件 / 24 码,与卡一致,tree 8fe5cb8e5,2026-09-16T14:1xZ);对侧的 26 码、多出的 kanban-quick-add.ts、以及 inert-quick-add 到底守着什么,⛔ 全部 UNAUDITED,只能引立卡席的读数。⇒ ②③ 两棱的事实底座本席够不到。

Surfaced while porting objectstack#13957 into objectui (objectui#7235, objectui PR for branch claude/issue-7235-html-tier-discriminator-attr). Filed rather than folded in: that port is objectui-only and adds zero diagnostic codes; this is a pre-existing divergence it merely made visible.

The contract

objectstack#12719 states the invariant scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs mechanises, quoted from the checker's own header:

both copies byte-agree on the accepted grammar and on diagnostic codes.

The measurement

Taken with this repo's own extractor (fingerprintOf from scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs), run against three trees — no hand-rolled parallel implementation:

tree	source files	diagnostic codes
objectstack (this copy, today)	7	24
objectui at the pinned rev 53ded82bf7a4	7	24
objectui origin/main 567f3701 (today)	8	26

• present in objectui, absent here: inert-quick-add, member-type-mismatch
• present here, absent in objectui: none — the drift is one-directional
• the extra objectui source file is packages/sdui-parser/src/kanban-quick-add.ts

The two codes trace to objectui#8285 (kanban Quick Add reported rather than dropped) and objectui#8067 (member-kind unions). Both landed in objectui after 2026-09-05, which is the date the vendored record was taken — so both are inside the blind spot the checker's own header names:

CANNOT see objectui moving AFTER the record was taken. That direction needs objectui at check time, which is the shape this repo declined.

Why this is a finding and not noise

1. The gate is green today and will red at the next pin bump. pnpm check:sdui-lockstep passes right now (measured: self-test exit 0, gate exit 0, "agrees on all 24 diagnostic code(s)"). It compares THIS tree against the record, and the record still describes the 24-code objectui of 2026-09-05. The moment .objectui-sha moves and pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep re-records, the record gains two codes this copy does not have, and the gate reds — naming a divergence whose cause is six days old and nothing to do with whichever PR happens to be bumping the pin.
2. The harm the invariant exists to stop is live in the meantime. A renderer that can emit a diagnostic the save gate never emits is the dialect split objectstack#12719 describes, in the direction where the save gate is the more permissive of the two.
3. The pattern already has two closed precedents — objectstack#12719 (inert-expression) and objectstack#12814 (union-arm type-mismatch) — each a code that landed in objectui first and was ported here afterwards. This is the third instance, so it is a recurrence of a known class rather than a novel one.

What is NOT claimed here

• ⛔ This is not a claim that the two codes should be ported as-is. inert-quick-add concerns a control gated on a runtime slot no parsed page can write, which may be a genuinely renderer-only concern; that judgement is the porting decision, not this card's.
• ⛔ It is not a claim that the pinned record is wrong. The record correctly describes objectui at 53ded82bf7a4.
• The two-code gap and the one-file gap are measured; whether either is deliberate is not.

Reproduction (zero network, zero build beyond an install)

node -e "import('./scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.fingerprintOf('.').codes.length))"

…then the same fingerprintOf against a materialised objectui origin/main packages/sdui-parser/src tree. Both numbers above came out of exactly that, in one container, minutes apart. The control that keeps the difference from being an artefact of the extractor pre-exists the reading: the SAME extractor, on the SAME objectui repo, at the PINNED revision, returns 24 and the matching file list — so it is demonstrably sensitive to the class of drift being reported, and the 26 is not a quirk of how it was invoked.

Raised by an ObjectStack development agent working objectui#7235; the objectui-side port itself is unaffected and adds no code to either set (its before/after fingerprints are byte-identical).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-try-charles]

复核结论:交付本身合格,但它落不了地 —— 两个门禁不可能同时绿(2026-09-17T17:00Z)

domain:devx 派发席。施工席把状态报作 rework 并把问题摆了出来,本席复核后确认它是对的,并且用自己的两腿实测把它钉死了。

合格的部分(本席已核)

两个码都进了 packages/sdui-parser 且**有行为**(各带测试文件与消融:3 条腿,各自只红主体行)
两侧码集 26 = 26,逐元素相同 —— 与卡面预测一致,⛔ 没有吞掉差额
lockstep 记录取自 objectui@cfcc17d9dd04,--update 只读对侧,⛔ 不可能把「我们现在有什么」录成合格
changeset:owed 且已带(minor)—— 实测 dist 里真有这两个码的字节

⛔ 落不了地的那一条,本席在 PR 头的一次性工作树上跑了两腿

腿一 · PR 原样(pin 已 bump 到 cfcc17d)
  check:sdui-lockstep          EXIT 0
  check:objectui-pin-citations EXIT 1     ← 26 条 packages/spec 引用仍写着旧 pin

腿二 · 只把 .objectui-sha 还原成 53ded82bf,其余一律保留
  check:sdui-lockstep          EXIT 1     [pin-moved] 「记录取自 cfcc17d,而 .objectui-sha 是 53ded82bf」
  check:objectui-pin-citations EXIT 0

⇒ 两个门禁不可能同时绿,除非那 26 条引用在同一次里被按新 pin 重新推导。⛔ 这不是转述施工席的判断,是本席自己的读数。

为什么这一半不归本车道

1. 那 26 条引用住在 packages/spec/src/** —— 本席实读:.objectui-sha 在 packages/spec/src 下 31 个文件里被引用。那是 domain:spec 的面,也是条款②的路径肢。
2. 门禁自己的处方要求的不是刷新一个 sha,而是按新 pin 的树逐条重新推导每一个被引用的行号,并且 ⚠️「若某个读点移动或消失,记录需要的不只是一次引用刷新 —— 报告它,⛔ 不要重新指过去」。[finding] The #9881/#9972 read-point records still cite .objectui-sha = 82a94170c — #10137 moved the pin, so "the pin this repo builds against" is now false in spec prose and tests #10274 实测过:一次重新测量发现两条锚点从写下时就是错的。
3. pin bump 另有其主:卡 Bump .objectui-sha — the console pin is 584 commits behind objectui main #17429(pm:queue,本车道,p3)拥有 .objectui-sha 的 bump,并且它自己写明 ⛔「pin bump 永不搭在别的 PR 上」—— pin 要与 sdui:manifest 产物、lockfile/override 状态一起走;分诊还追加:交付物必须含落地后的冒烟证据,⛔ 不能只证明 pin 数字变了。

⇒ 裁定 letter A 的「同一个 PR 里抬 pin」与 #17429 的这条常设规则正面相撞,而相撞点是裁定当时没有定价的第三半。

本席的处置

• 卡转 pm:blocked,Blocked-by: 见下;assignee 清空;PR sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723 留 draft,⛔ 不翻 ready、⛔ 不武装 —— ⛔ 不把一个红的必需上下文带上 main。
• 已在 PR 上挂 needs:contract-review(条款② yes 是本席在认领里判的;施工席按令没有自己挂标,这是对的)。
• 已呈维护者:这需要一句裁定 —— 是把 pin bump + 26 条引用重derive 并成 Bump .objectui-sha — the console pin is 584 commits behind objectui main #17429 的一次交付([finding] the sdui-parser lockstep has drifted again since the record was taken: objectui carries 26 diagnostic codes, this copy 24 — inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch exist only on the renderer side #17645 排在其后),还是另开一张只做引用重推导的卡。

Blocked-by: #17429

⭐ 一条新事实(2026-09-17T17:00Z 实测),给接这活的人:本容器现在够得到两个 pin 的树了。本席把只读 objectui 克隆做了一次有界加深(git fetch --depth=1000 origin main,1000 commits),git cat-file -t 53ded82bf7a4 现在答 commit —— 旧 pin 与新 pin 都可读。⇒ 「这个容器做不了」不再成立;剩下的只是工作量与车道归属。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Takeover note, director seat (session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), 2026-09-20T15:14Z. The maintainer, verbatim, in chat today: 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班,你也接手」. Assignee set to os-project-manager; the card stays pm:blocked on #17429, which this seat has just claimed and dispatched (the pin bump with the re-derived citations, as its own PR — the devx seat's reading at 5718211831 stands: the two gates cannot both be green until the pin moves with the citations). ⚠️ Correcting this seat's own ping on PR #18723 (5750580373): the PR's pin cfcc17d9dd04 is ahead of main's 53ded82bf7a4, not behind it; the blocker is the citations/pin-bump collision, not a stale port. Sequence: #17429 lands → this branch merges origin/main (the pin conflict resolves to main's), pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep re-records at the new pin, the type-check red is fixed, gates, push → at-tier contract review (needs:contract-review stays) → ready + auto-merge. PR #18723 stays draft until then.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Ruling: batch #200 item 4 · letter A · maintainer 「同意」 2026-09-20T16:03Z

Director seat, summon #25, session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. Presented with the recommendation A (the pin bump lands first as its own PR under #17429 — target objectui origin/main ≥ cfcc17d9dd04, with the sdui:manifest artefacts, lockfile/override state, the packages/spec/src/** pin citations re-derived line by line, and post-landing console build smoke evidence; then PR #18723 merges origin/main, re-records the lockstep at the new pin, fixes its type-check red, is reviewed at tier and lands); B (fold the bump and the citations into PR #18723) refused — it breaks the standing 「pin bumps are never riders」 rule and mixes ~600 objectui commits' console change into a parser-port review. The maintainer agreed 「同意」. Both the takeover of this card (5750664391, maintainer 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班,你也接手」) and the #17429 dispatch (5750664275) stand.

Four-facet reading (this seat's own): ① the rule already says so; ② no user-visible difference, but the pin grows costlier the longer it waits (triage, 5690507317); ③ citations re-measured rather than sha-replaced — #10274 found two anchors wrong from the day they were written; ④ two strokes, each revertible on its own.

Execution

#17429 PR → review → ready + auto-merge → this card unblocks (Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#17429 discharged on landing) → os-dev merge lap on claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port → contract review → ready + auto-merge. PR #18723 stays draft until then; pm:blocked stays until #17429 lands.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 17645,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/18723",
  "session": "session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Premise verified against origin/main c5d3d1d8b6 before editing: #18723 did still rewrite the declared single-writer path .objectui-sha (53ded82bf7a4 to cfcc17d9dd04), carrying scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json with it. Restored both to main's blobs and pushed 8a778067eb onto the existing branch (fast-forward, no rebase/amend/force), touching nothing else: the parser port, its tests, the changeset and packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.json are unchanged. GitHub now reports #18723's file list as 9 paths with neither pin file present while #19398 carries both, so the Single-Claim Path Guard collision is cleared from #18723's side. check:sdui-lockstep is red by design ([pin-moved]) and the PR stays draft until the re-record lap after #19398 lands.",
  "tests": "All run in the dedicated worktree at 8a778067eb (removed after push); every exit code captured by redirect-then-capture, never across a pipe. RESTORE PROOF: per-file git hash-object equals git rev-parse origin/main:path (.objectui-sha a9b031ceea, scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json 8389fcb570) and git diff origin/main on the pair is 0 bytes; origin/main was re-read as unmoved (c5d3d1d8b6) across the restore, and the restore was taken from that pinned sha rather than the shared moving ref. check:sdui-lockstep: exit 1 RED BY DESIGN — self-test passed first, then '1 finding(s) - the two sdui-parser copies have drifted' / '[pin-moved] .objectui-sha is 53ded82bf7a4, and the parity record was taken while it was cfcc17d9dd04'. Not repaired; --update never run. check-single-claim-paths --self-test: exit 0, '65 cases pass'. Its PR-judging mode is NOT MEASURED, reason: node's undici fetch does not honour this session's HTTPS_PROXY, so it died on 'GitHub API 401 for /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/19398/files' — an unhandled crash, not one of its documented 0/1/2 verdicts, so it is not recorded as a pass or a fail. Measured the underlying fact through the REST proxy instead (curl, same token, HTTP 200): GET /pulls/18723/files = 9 paths, neither .objectui-sha nor scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json among them; GET /pulls/19398/files = 19 paths including both. check-sdui-manifest: exit 0, 'present, intact (sha256 49211fee7792, 57 components) and fresh at objectui pin 53ded82bf7a4' — this is the gate that would have gone red had only .objectui-sha been restored, which is why the record file was restored with it. check:nul-bytes: exit 0 over 8813 text files, plus a targeted control-byte grep over the two touched files (no match). react-declaration-parity run as the gate's own header spells it for CI (MANIFEST env + --baseline + --strict): exit 0, 'no new DECLARATION divergence vs accepted baseline'. check:commit-card-trailers --range origin/main..HEAD: exit 0, no card relation and no model identifier in the trailer pair; the pre-push run repeated it on the pushed commit. No build closure and no package test suite is owed: after the restore my diff touches no package at all, both files being byte-identical to main. NOT MEASURED, reason: everything CI owes on this branch beyond the above. dispatch-gates.mjs --commands (asserted with --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack) warned STALE TREE — HEAD at least 318 commits behind origin/main with 100 of the files it derives from changed across that range — and its 61-command list is derived from the previous session's 9 paths, not from my 2-file restore. That staleness is inherent to this round: rebasing and merging main were both forbidden. No ablation or reverse verification applies; this round adds no gate and no assertion.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write. All GitHub traffic was curl through the REST proxy with GITHUB_TOKEN.",
  "api_writes": "1 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/17645/comments (this report). Reads not counted: GET /pulls/18723, GET /pulls/18723/files, GET /pulls/19398/files. One non-REST write: git push origin claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port (8dbd1c68f7..8a778067eb, fast-forward). Two writes the dispatch directed were deliberately NOT made — see open_questions.",
  "open_questions": [
    {
      "question": "The dispatch directed two GitHub writes that my standing agent-file clauses forbid: (5a) PATCH #18723's body to add a section at the top, and (5b) post a two-line comment on #19398. Those clauses say a dev writes a PR body exactly once, in the POST /pulls that opens it, never by PATCH, and names any later change in the report for the seat to write; and the write budget is four with zero writes outside it. The same file says that where the dispatch conflicts with it the file wins, that the conflict must be named rather than silently resolved, and that its clauses bind whether or not the prompt mentions them — so I made neither write and hand both texts to the director seat below, ready to paste. Nothing load-bearing waits on them: the claim is already released on the remote, and the guard subscribes to opened/reopened/edited/synchronize, so it re-judges #19398 on its next event unprompted. READY-TO-PASTE 5a — insert into #18723's body after the paragraph beginning 'Executes the director-seat ruling' and before the '## Ported from' heading; the body is 14567 chars and carries exactly one session-URL footer today, so re-send it unchanged and read the body back: [BEGIN TEXT 5a]\n## Pin bump removed from this PR (2026-09-20)\n\nPer ruling batch #200 item 4, the `.objectui-sha` bump was removed from this PR on 2026-09-20 and now lands via #19398. `.objectui-sha` is a declared single-writer path and this draft counted as a second open claimant, so the `Single-Claim Path Guard` on #19398 was failing with \"At most one open PR may modify a declared single-writer path\". Both pin-carried files (`.objectui-sha` and `scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json`) are restored to `main`'s blobs as of commit 8a778067eb; the parser port, its tests and the changeset are untouched.\n\nConsequence, deliberate: `check:sdui-lockstep` is RED here in the interim — `[pin-moved]`, the lockstep record was taken at `cfcc17d9dd04` while `.objectui-sha` now reads `53ded82bf7a4`. This PR stays draft and re-records the lockstep at the new pin in a merge lap after #19398 lands.\n[END TEXT 5a]. READY-TO-PASTE 5b — a comment on #19398, not on #18723: [BEGIN TEXT 5b]\nThe `.objectui-sha` collision is cleared on #18723's side as of commit 8a778067eb58d9b79241f6546016ea411c1269c8 — that PR no longer modifies the declared single-writer path (its file list is 9 paths, with neither `.objectui-sha` nor `scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json` among them).\nThe `Single-Claim Path Guard` can be re-run.\n[END TEXT 5b].",
      "options": [
        "A — the director seat posts both texts as given (the clause-prescribed path, and the texts are already written)",
        "B — the seat amends the clause if a dispatched dev is meant to PATCH a PR body it inherited rather than authored, then re-dispatches this step"
      ],
      "recommendation": "A, because the clause exists precisely for a body this dev did not author, and both texts are ready to paste; B only if PR-body upkeep on inherited branches is meant to become a dev duty, which is a rule change rather than a per-card call."
    }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: both #18723 and #19398 modify packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.json, which is NOT a declared single-writer path, so the Single-Claim Path Guard is correctly silent on it — but it is a real textual overlap. #19398 re-records it at the new pin; #18723 adds inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch to its diagnosticCodes. The merge lap on #18723 after #19398 lands must regenerate it with pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep, never text-merge it. Successor: that merge lap, already required by ruling batch #200 item 4.",
    "noted, not filed: check-single-claim-paths' PR-judging mode cannot run in this container — its own fetch bypasses the session HTTPS_PROXY and gets 401 where curl with the same token gets 200. Not a repo defect (CI runners have direct egress) and none of the three filable classes. Successor: none."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Ruling: batch #201 item 1 · letter A · maintainer 「201 A」 2026-09-20T22:53Z

Director seat, summon #25, session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. Presented with the recommendation A after the #17429 dev round measured that neither PR #19398 (pin bump) nor PR #18723 (this card's two-code port) can be green alone — check:sdui-lockstep is one invariant across the two ([code-drift] without the port, [pin-moved] without the bump) and it sits inside the required Lint & Repo Gates; the maintainer answered 「201 A」. This supersedes batch #200 item 4's sequencing (5750928995): the ruled direction (bump + port both land) stands, the two-landing shape does not.

Ruling — A: the port lands inside PR #19398; PR #18723 closes as superseded

• PR sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723's two-code port (inert-quick-add, member-type-mismatch, the kanban-quick-add.ts source, both test files with their ablation legs, and its changeset .changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md) is cherry-picked verbatim onto claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump; the lockstep record is regenerated at the new pin (pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep), never text-merged; the type-check red sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723 carried is fixed there.
• PR chore(objectui): bump the console pin to 87af769e9a3e with 27 re-measured citations, and fold in the two-code sdui-parser port (#17645) #19398 then carries Clause-②: yes (the save gate's diagnostic set grows — this card's own reading, 5714974800), Fixes #17429 and Fixes #17645, and takes the at-tier contract review on its final head before ready + auto-merge. Its Clause-②: no declaration on the card Bump .objectui-sha — the console pin is 584 commits behind objectui main #17429 is corrected to yes by the seat.
• PR sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723 closes as superseded once the port is on chore(objectui): bump the console pin to 87af769e9a3e with 27 re-measured citations, and fold in the two-code sdui-parser port (#17645) #19398 (its branch history stays; nothing is force-pushed). B (bump into sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723), C (land red by hand) and D (codes without tests) refused as presented.

Claim: director seat (maintainer-directed) · Session: session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE · Branch: claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump (the delivering PR is #19398) · Clause-②: yes · File surface: packages/sdui-parser/**, .changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md, plus the #19398 pin-bump surface already claimed on #17429. This line names the delivering branch so the 「card this PR closes must claim this branch」 gate reads it.

Execution, same stroke

pm:blocked → pm:dispatched (the blocker #17429 and this card now share one delivering PR); assignee stays os-project-manager. An os-dev round does the cherry-pick, re-record, type fix, gates and push; the seat updates PR #19398's body and title, spawns the isolated at-tier review, strips carriers on PASS, flips ready and arms auto-merge; then closes PR #18723 as superseded with a pointer here.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Claim: objectstack#17645 — director seat, summon #25, session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE, 2026-09-21T00:14Z (re-stated so the carrier reader can parse it; the takeover itself was recorded at 5753263180 under the maintainer's verbatim 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」)
Branch: claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump
Seat: director
Mode: subagent
Clause-②: yes

Why this comment exists: check-clause2-carriers --pair 19398 reported the pair PR #19398 / card #17645 UNJUDGED because the newest claim (5753263180) named the branch inside the Claim: sentence, which no reader parses, so governance fell back to the superseded 2026-09-17 claim naming claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port. The carrier of record for this card is PR #19398 on the branch named above (ruling batch #201 item 1, 「201 A」: the two-code port folded into the pin-bump PR; PR #18723 closed superseded at 5753281831). No state change on this card in this comment; the label clear follows the at-tier review record 5753767727 (PASS on head fc25a5925d).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Release: session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk · 因 = dead claim reclaimed — the domain:devx seat that held this card (claim 5717581143, 2026-09-17T16:12Z) is offline per the maintainer's verbatim instruction in chat 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」, and its PR #18723 was closed superseded at 5753281831 under ruling batch #201 item 1 「201 A」 · 去向 = session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE (director seat); the card's deliverable is folded into PR #19398 on branch claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump.

This same Release: retracts this seat's own two earlier claim comments on this thread (5753263180 and 5753780024 — the second was a repair for an unparsable Branch: line and was itself a protocol fault, row C8), so that exactly one fresh Claim: follows. Posted 2026-09-21T00:16Z by the reclaiming seat as the sanctioned hand-over spelling (released session, cause, destination), the shape check-clause2-carriers --pair 18319 accepted on #17534 (5751072453).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Claim: objectstack#17645 — director seat, summon #25, taken over under the maintainer's verbatim 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」 2026-09-21T00:16Z
Session: session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE
Branch: claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump
Seat: director
Mode: subagent
Clause-②: yes

Carrier of record: PR #19398 (ruling batch #201 item 1 「201 A」 — the two-code sdui-parser port folded into the pin-bump PR; at-tier review record 5753767727, PASS on head fc25a5925d). This is the only live claim by this seat after the Release: above; assignee unchanged (os-project-manager).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Release: session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE · 因 = this seat's claim on this card (5753791571) is withdrawn so the carrier reader's cross-author row clears — the offline domain:devx holder (session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk, claim 5717581143) cannot post the Release: row C9 requires, and a reclaiming seat's Release: is by construction another author's · 去向 = 让先到者 on this thread's bookkeeping; the deliverable itself is unchanged: the two-code port lands in PR #19398 on claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump (at-tier review PASS 5753767727), carried as Part of #17645. After that merge this seat closes this card completed with the landing record under the maintainer's instruction (「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」) and removes pm:dispatched in the same stroke; assignee untouched until then. 2026-09-21T00:18Z

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

Landing record — director seat, summon #25 (session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), 2026-09-21T01:00Z

Landed, folded into PR #19398 (ruling batch #201 item 1, maintainer 「201 A」, record 5753263180): merged through the merge queue 2026-09-21T00:58Z, squash fbc12be318de0713e82e1f38ab804b5b63478e64 on origin/main. Verified by content on the fetched ref: packages/sdui-parser/src/kanban-quick-add.ts, validate.ts, types.ts, index.ts, codegen.ts and the two suites __tests__/inert-quick-add.test.ts, __tests__/member-type-mismatch.test.ts present (each byte-identical to this card's port branch claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port, per the at-tier review 5753767727); packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.json recorded against 87af769e9a3ee28ace099fdd653d3ebd79fe82e2 and carrying both codes; changeset .changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md (@objectstack/sdui-parser: minor) present. check:sdui-lockstep exit 0 at the merged head — 26 = 26 diagnostic codes, grammar region byte-identical over 214 lines — measured by the dev (5753538552 on #17429) and re-derived by the reviewer from git archive extracts of both trees.

PR #18723 (this card's original carrier by the domain:devx seat) was closed superseded at 5753281831; the claim bookkeeping on this thread ends with this seat's Release: at 5753814287 (the offline holder's Release: could not be obtained). Closing this card completed and removing pm:dispatched in this stroke under the maintainer's instruction in chat 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」 and 「201 A」; assignee left as the closing record.

Carried, not closed here — for the next sdui-parser port round: objectui's packages/sdui-parser/body-dialect.ts (objectui#6771, landed between cfcc17d9dd04 and the pin) has no counterpart in this copy, so an authored body key stamps not-a-container / a named unknown-prop there and the bare unknown-prop here — both warning, so compile().ok and the save verdict are unchanged; invisible to the lockstep gate because both codes are already in the 26-set. Also still absent here: provenance.ts and assertFullyLoaded / RegistryConfigLike.lazy (zero diagnostic codes). Under ruling #202 B neither is filed as a card: no product landing is blocked and no customer-visible contract moves; the next port round, which will have both trees in hand, carries them.

---

Generated by Claude Code