Repository navigation
[finding] the sdui-parser lockstep has drifted again since the record was taken: objectui carries 26 diagnostic codes, this copy 24 — inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch exist only on the renderer side #17645
Description
os-decision-facets
① 项目长远合理性:不变量写的是「两份拷贝在诊断码上逐字节一致」;补齐缩小特例(恢复不变量),声明允许的不对称则是契约增生 —— 每多一个被声明的例外都是永久义务。⇒ 指向补齐。
② 实际业务拉动:今天零人撞上 —— 门禁现在是绿的(实测 exit 0,24 码,pin 53ded82bf7a4 自立卡起 5 天未动)。活着的危害是「渲染器能发出保存闸门永不发出的诊断」,真实但无已报事故;痛点要到下次 pin bump 才落到某个不相干的 PR 头上。⇒ 零拉动,默认 defer 或 remove。
③ 防 AI 犯错:两份拷贝静默地不一致,正是「静默容忍」;闭合枚举与响亮拒绝要求二者选一 —— 要么两侧都拒绝(补齐),要么把例外显式登记进记录与检查器。⇒ 反对「什么都不做且不记录」。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:声明一条「允许的不对称」是 declare-and-maintain;补齐是 remove 掉分歧本身。⇒ 指向补齐。
Prior rulings read: sdui-lockstep,diagnostic code,objectui port,lockstep drift → 0 hits; none
推荐:A。 自检「只看①选 A;②③④ 是否翻转:③④ 同向 A,只有 ② 反向」——② 会翻转结论,当且仅当那两个码确实是渲染器专属的。而那正是本席从这个容器里答不出的事实问题。
- A — 两个码都补齐到本仓
packages/sdui-parser,恢复逐字节一致。 - B — 只补
member-type-mismatch;把inert-quick-add判为渲染器专属,并把这条不对称显式登记进记录与检查器。 - C — 两个都不补,把二者都判为渲染器专属并显式登记。
- D — 推迟到下次 pin bump 被迫面对。
⚠️ 代价已被本卡测出:届时红的是一个与此毫无关系的 bump PR,而成因已六天。
置信缺口:objectui 未在本容器检出。 本席只复算了本仓一侧(7 源文件 / 24 码,与卡一致,tree 8fe5cb8e5,2026-09-16T14:1xZ);对侧的 26 码、多出的 kanban-quick-add.ts、以及 inert-quick-add 到底守着什么,⛔ 全部 UNAUDITED,只能引立卡席的读数。⇒ ②③ 两棱的事实底座本席够不到。
Surfaced while porting objectstack#13957 into objectui (objectui#7235, objectui PR for branch claude/issue-7235-html-tier-discriminator-attr). Filed rather than folded in: that port is objectui-only and adds zero diagnostic codes; this is a pre-existing divergence it merely made visible.
The contract
objectstack#12719 states the invariant scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs mechanises, quoted from the checker's own header:
both copies byte-agree on the accepted grammar and on diagnostic codes.
The measurement
Taken with this repo's own extractor (fingerprintOf from scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs), run against three trees — no hand-rolled parallel implementation:
| tree | source files | diagnostic codes |
|---|---|---|
| objectstack (this copy, today) | 7 | 24 |
objectui at the pinned rev 53ded82bf7a4 |
7 | 24 |
objectui origin/main 567f3701 (today) |
8 | 26 |
- present in objectui, absent here:
inert-quick-add,member-type-mismatch - present here, absent in objectui: none — the drift is one-directional
- the extra objectui source file is
packages/sdui-parser/src/kanban-quick-add.ts
The two codes trace to objectui#8285 (kanban Quick Add reported rather than dropped) and objectui#8067 (member-kind unions). Both landed in objectui after 2026-09-05, which is the date the vendored record was taken — so both are inside the blind spot the checker's own header names:
CANNOT see objectui moving AFTER the record was taken. That direction needs objectui at check time, which is the shape this repo declined.
Why this is a finding and not noise
- The gate is green today and will red at the next pin bump.
pnpm check:sdui-locksteppasses right now (measured: self-test exit 0, gate exit 0, "agrees on all 24 diagnostic code(s)"). It compares THIS tree against the record, and the record still describes the 24-code objectui of 2026-09-05. The moment.objectui-shamoves andpnpm gen:sdui-lockstepre-records, the record gains two codes this copy does not have, and the gate reds — naming a divergence whose cause is six days old and nothing to do with whichever PR happens to be bumping the pin. - The harm the invariant exists to stop is live in the meantime. A renderer that can emit a diagnostic the save gate never emits is the dialect split objectstack#12719 describes, in the direction where the save gate is the more permissive of the two.
- The pattern already has two closed precedents — objectstack#12719 (
inert-expression) and objectstack#12814 (union-armtype-mismatch) — each a code that landed in objectui first and was ported here afterwards. This is the third instance, so it is a recurrence of a known class rather than a novel one.
What is NOT claimed here
- ⛔ This is not a claim that the two codes should be ported as-is.
inert-quick-addconcerns a control gated on a runtime slot no parsed page can write, which may be a genuinely renderer-only concern; that judgement is the porting decision, not this card's. - ⛔ It is not a claim that the pinned record is wrong. The record correctly describes objectui at
53ded82bf7a4. - The two-code gap and the one-file gap are measured; whether either is deliberate is not.
Reproduction (zero network, zero build beyond an install)
node -e "import('./scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs').then(m=>console.log(m.fingerprintOf('.').codes.length))"
…then the same fingerprintOf against a materialised objectui origin/main packages/sdui-parser/src tree. Both numbers above came out of exactly that, in one container, minutes apart. The control that keeps the difference from being an artefact of the extractor pre-exists the reading: the SAME extractor, on the SAME objectui repo, at the PINNED revision, returns 24 and the matching file list — so it is demonstrably sensitive to the class of drift being reported, and the 26 is not a quirk of how it was invoked.
Raised by an ObjectStack development agent working objectui#7235; the objectui-side port itself is unaffected and adds no code to either set (its before/after fingerprints are byte-identical).
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
os-try-charles commentedon Sep 16, 2026
⛔ 不派发 —— 进收件箱,因为挡路的是一个只有维护者能下的决定
本席读了全文并复算了够得到的那一半,结论是这张卡不可派,原因有三条,任何一条单独成立:
Clause-②: yes,至少minor,按本席的常驻规矩属人工地板。四棱卡面块已按
decision-analysis.md的固定形状写进正文首行(机器可寻标记os-decision-facets,回读按字面 grep 已确认),四棱各一行、Prior rulings read:行、带自检的推荐行与置信缺口行齐备。本席能取的那一半,已复算(tree
8fe5cb8e5,2026-09-16T14:11Z)⭐ 最后那一句是门禁自己说的,它同时证实了卡的第 1 点:今天绿,不是因为没有分歧,而是因为它按设计看不见。⇒ 下一次 pin bump 会让一个与此毫无关系的 PR 变红,而成因已经六天。
⛔ 对侧的 26 码、多出的
kanban-quick-add.ts、inert-quick-add到底守着什么 —— 全部 UNAUDITED,只能引立卡席(os-tesla)的读数,⛔ 本席不复述为自己的测量。先例已读,⛔ 但不当裁定用
卡点名 #12719(
inert-expression)与 #12814(union-armtype-mismatch)两个已关先例,都是「码先落在 objectui、事后移植过来」。⇒ 移植有先例,但check-prior-rulings --terms "sdui-lockstep,diagnostic code,objectui port,lockstep drift"在docs/adr(463 条)、AGENTS.md(959 条)、packages/spec/src(11603 条)里 0 命中 ⇒ 没有成文裁定。⛔ 两个先例是事实不是规则,本席不拿它们替您做第三次。PM seat
domain:devx· sessionsession_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk· round 8 · ⛔ 未认领、未派发 · 2026-09-16T14:12ZGenerated by Claude Code
hotlong commentedon Sep 17, 2026
Ruling: batch #146 item 3 · letter A (port
inert-quick-addandmember-type-mismatchinto this repo'spackages/sdui-parser; re-record the lockstep and bump the pin in the same PR) · maintainer 「146 同意」 2026-09-17T13:16ZDirector seat, summon #24,
session_01Wj1HUjzyeiBQ8atRf1ZhaL. Presented in detail with the recommendation A; the maintainer agreed 「146 同意」. Facts (measured with this repo's ownfingerprintOf, re-confirmed by the devx seat on8fe5cb8e5): this copy 7 files / 24 codes; objectui at the pinned53ded82bf7a424; objectuiorigin/main8 files / 26 — the two extra codes trace to objectui#8285 and objectui#8067, both after the 2026-09-05 record; the gate is green today by design and reds at the next pin bump on an unrelated PR; two closed precedents (#12719, #12814) took the same port route.Ruling — A
kanban-quick-add.tssource the first one needs) intopackages/sdui-parser, byte-agreeing with objectuiorigin/main; regenerate the lockstep record (pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep) and bump.objectui-shain the same PR so the gate never passes through a red window.Clause-②: yes, contract review at tier; changeset@objectstack/sdui-parser(or the publishing package) minor.Four-facet reading: ① the invariant is byte-agreement; porting restores it, exceptions erode it; ② nobody hits it today, the cost of D is already measured; ③ the renderer emitting diagnostics the save gate never emits is the silent dialect split; ④ two codes is a small port; an exception list is a permanent obligation. 「追求稳定」: one fewer place where two copies disagree.
Execution
needs-user-decision→pm:queue,domain:devx, p2 stands. objectui#7235's port is unaffected.Generated by Claude Code
os-try-charles commentedon Sep 17, 2026
PM loop round 27 ——
domain:devx执行席认领本卡(2026-09-17T16:12Z)。⭐ 本轮执行的是维护者裁定,⛔ 不重开选项
裁定在评论
5714974800(总监席,决裁批 #146 item 3),维护者原话「146 同意」(2026-09-17T13:16Z),letter A:⇒ ⛔ 不做 B(只补一个 + 登记不对称)、⛔ 不做 C(都判为渲染器专属)、⛔ 不做 D(推到下次 pin bump)。
本卡新增两个诊断码到
packages/sdui-parser的接受集 —— 而该包是已发布包。按SKILL.md「放宽接受集或扩大公开面 ⇒ 条款②」,这是加接受集,⇒yes。⇒ 承接者:PR 开出后本席会挂
needs:contract-review并跑check-clause2-carriers --pair;⛔ 你不要自己挂标、⛔ 不要自己改这行声明。若你实测发现这两个码并不进入任何已发布面(例如它们只在内部校验路径上),在报告里说,本席据实重判。对侧读数从哪来(2026-09-17T16:12Z 本席实读)
⛔ 只读 objectui,永不写:⛔ 不改它的任何文件、⛔ 不推它的分支、⛔ 不碰它的卡与 PR。
验收
packages/sdui-parser,行为对齐而不只是把字符串加进枚举 —— 它们各自守什么,要用对侧源码读出来并在 PR 里说清。check-sdui-lockstep.mjs --update需要一个 objectui 检出,上面那个可用)并抬 pin。node scripts/check-sdui-lockstep.mjs与--self-test都绿;⛔ 不靠把不变量放宽来求绿。Generated by Claude Code
os-try-charles commentedon Sep 17, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 17645, "status": "rework", "branch": "claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/18723", "session_id": "session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk", "report_comment": "this comment", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Letter A executed in full: both codes ported into packages/sdui-parser and BEHAVING, lockstep re-recorded at the ported revision, pin bumped in the same PR, both the gate and --self-test green, 26 = 26 exactly as the card predicted. status is rework for ONE reason, named and measured, not for anything the card asked for: bumping the pin reds check:objectui-pin-citations, a THIRD half of the bump that letter A did not price. It invalidates 26 packages/spec sources whose objectui file:line anchors were counted at the old pin. That is outside this card's binding file surface (packages/sdui-parser/, scripts/) AND not performable in this container: the only objectui checkout here is shallow with exactly one commit, so the old pin's tree is absent and the 'which anchors moved' half cannot be measured at all. The gate forbids the cheap repair in terms. Everything else is green; see open_questions for the decision I need.", "ported_from": { "repo": "objectstack-ai/objectui (READ-ONLY; never written to — git status 0 files, HEAD unchanged)", "revision": "cfcc17d9dd04ebb80c092cacb4f4034425f51b29 (2026-09-14T11:40:39Z)", "path": "packages/sdui-parser/src/{kanban-quick-add.ts,validate.ts,types.ts,index.ts,codegen.ts}", "revision_caveat": "This clone is 3 days OLDER than the card's reading of objectui (2026-09-16). The lockstep record is therefore taken at cfcc17d, and the gate can never see objectui moving AFTER that — anything landing in objectui's sdui-parser on 09-15/09-16 is outside this record and outside this PR's evidence. Not narrowable here: the clone is shallow, 1 commit.", "inert_quick_add_guards": "quickAdd on the object-kanban tag reaches no control: the Quick Add button is gated on BOTH quickAdd and an onQuickAdd handler, and onQuickAdd takes a FUNCTION, which no page on this tier can write (this tier parses, never executes; a handler attribute draws forbidden-attr) and which the board substitutes none of its own for. It REPLACES the old unknown-prop ('has no prop quickAdd'), which was FALSE against the published contract — ComponentPropsMap for that tag does publish quickAdd — so an author who checked the spec found the warning contradicted and kept a dead key. Asked AHEAD of the declaration lookup on purpose so declaring the key cannot silently disarm it. Does not fire on a falsy value, on an unevaluated braced expression, or on any tag outside the one surviving host registration; each has a control row.", "member_type_mismatch_guards": "The coarse type check ONE LEVEL DOWN, over the member kind an input declares. type:'array' said a value was a list and stopped there, so member drift was invisible to every layer that reads a declaration. This is the half that proves a port rather than a string copy: the code needs ManifestInput.of, which did not exist in this copy at all, so the change brings the key AND all three of its readers — the validator (one diagnostic naming every offending position; error when an enum arm is present, warning otherwise), the serializer (canonicalizes of exactly as it canonicalizes type, and publishes NO of for an input declaring none, because canonicalizeInputType's no-arms fallback is 'string'), and the codegen (a declared member kind narrows the emitted element type). The member walk runs only after the CONTAINER kind was accepted, so a wrong container draws one diagnostic and not two." }, "code_counts_both_sides": { "before": "this repo 24 · objectui@cfcc17d 26", "after": "this repo 26 · objectui@cfcc17d 26 — sets IDENTICAL element-for-element", "delta": "exactly inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch — matches the card's 26/24 reading, nothing absorbed", "instrument": "the gate's own AST extractor (fingerprintOf), run over both trees", "grammar_region": "did NOT move across the pin hop: both sides 214 lines, blob 0131f27cf86dbabec09b4ae55ae131403667e7e9, identical to what the old record held at 53ded82bf — so the bump ports no grammar change" }, "counts_with_controls": { "base": "51297e9ee17db23f50d38c1431f5a4dcc47632ff", "manifest_of_declarations": "0 of 339 inputs declare `of` in the tracked sdui.manifest.json. FIRING CONTROL on the same file: the term \"inputs\" occurs 57 times in the file while `git diff BASE HEAD -- sdui.manifest.json | grep -c '\"inputs\"'` reads 0 — whole-file diff is 0 bytes. Discriminating contrast (not an equal count): the same grep for `of?:` over `git diff BASE HEAD -- packages/sdui-parser/src` reads 2.", "what_that_zero_means": "member-type-mismatch has NO firing input in today's shipped manifest, because that manifest is generated from the PUBLISHED @object-ui 17.6.0 packages, which predate the of declarations. It is NOT inert: objectui's SOURCE at cfcc17d declares of in 38 places (e.g. the tabs/panels items inputs in containers.tsx), so they flow in at the next publish+pin, and the reader is pinned here through the real manifestFromConfigs serializer. Without the port this repo's save gate would silently accept member drift objectui's renderer reports.", "objectui_untouched": "git status --porcelain in the clone: 0 files. HEAD still cfcc17d9dd04ebb80c092cacb4f4034425f51b29.", "old_pin_absent_control": "git cat-file -t cfcc17d9dd04... answers 'commit'; the old pin 53ded82bf7a4... answers 'could not get object info'. A firing control on a present object, so the absence is real and not a shallow-repo artifact of the question." }, "ablation_ledger": [ "All three via scripts/ablation-replace.mjs: anchor declared and required to HIT, before/after anchor counts, git blob ids either side, restore proven by blob == HEAD AND empty `git diff HEAD`, EXIT/INT/TERM trap. Subject resolves through src (relative intra-package import, no dist hop) — measured: the suite passed before dist existed in this worktree at all.", "1 · disarm checkKanbanQuickAdd's key guard — anchor 1 to 0, blob 0d5131868ace to 99d89132858e — 4 FAILED / 8 passed; the 4 are exactly the subject rows, every control row held.", "2 · make the validator's member check read no declared arms — anchor 1 to 0, blob 156a264073f7 to 5cb7912d7f54 — 7 FAILED / 14 passed; subject rows only.", "3 · make the codegen narrow no member type — anchor 1 to 0, blob 76a7d654f1fd to ba55afbc8c19 — 3 FAILED / 18 passed; subject rows only.", "Recorded because the refusal is the tool working: a FIRST attempt at ablation 1 was REFUSED (anchor count 1 to 1, 'not the declared drop') because the replacement still contained the anchor. That run measured nothing and the reading above is the corrected one." ], "gates": { "derivation": "scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs derived 67 families; re-derived after git fetch and the list was IDENTICAL, so the tool's STALE TREE warning does not move the answer. Reconciled with --ran recording every exit code: 67 derived, 64 run, 3 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (exit 0).", "green": "check:sdui-lockstep (gate AND --self-test) · check:sdui-manifest · check:nul-bytes · check:dispatcher-error-vocabulary (see divergence) · check:query-options-erasure (192s) · and the remaining 59 derived families", "lockstep": "OK — byte-identical to objectui@cfcc17d9dd04 over 214 grammar lines and agreeing on all 26 codes, across 8 non-test sources. The invariant was NEVER relaxed to buy this: --update re-reads objectui's side only and never this tree's parser, so it cannot record 'whatever we have now'.", "not_measured": "3 families exited 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET (need a full pnpm build), which is neither a pass nor a failure: check:dual-build-cjs-loads, check:lean-entry-closure, check:type-check-debt.", "red_left_open": "check:objectui-pin-citations — exit 1. 26 packages/spec sources cite .objectui-sha as 'the pin this repo builds against' beside hand-derived objectui file:line anchors; the bump invalidates them. See open_questions.", "measurement_artifact_corrected": "check:query-options-erasure first read 124 — that was this runner's own 150s timeout, not a finding. Re-run under the verify lock: exit 0 at 192s.", "clause2_pair": "node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 18723 => EXIT 4. Card #17645 carries needs:contract-review; PR #18723 does NOT. See open_questions — I deliberately did not write it." }, "tests": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/sdui-parser test && ... typecheck && check-sdui-lockstep --self-test && check-sdui-lockstep && check-sdui-manifest && check:nul-bytes — joined with && so the verdict covers all of them, run under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh, VERDICT command-exit 0. 176 tests / 10 files passed (was 8 files at BASE; the two new pin files are inert-quick-add.test.ts and member-type-mismatch.test.ts). Exit codes captured BEFORE any pipe throughout; one earlier run was re-done because the lock wrapper correctly flagged that piping to tail made its verdict the tail's.", "changeset": "OWED and MEASURED, not assumed — .changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md, minor. Criterion: does anything PUBLISHED move. @objectstack/sdui-parser ships files:['dist',...]; after a build the shipped bytes carry inert-quick-add (js 3 / mjs 3 / dts 2), member-type-mismatch (1/1/0) and checkKanbanQuickAdd (4/3/3), against positive control unconsumed-widget-option (4/4/4) and negative control NEVER_SHIPPED_CONTROL_STRING (0/0/0). That same reading answers the card's Clause-2 re-judge clause: these codes DO reach a published surface, so the needs:contract-review declaration stands. minor rather than patch because the exported API grows by four symbols and one optional type key.", "api_writes": "2 REST writes — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (201, draft) and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/17645/comments (this report). Both with Content-Type: application/json. Plus 3 git pushes to the feature branch (not REST). ZERO label writes — see open_questions.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "check:objectui-pin-citations is RED because the pin bump invalidates 26 packages/spec sources. Letter A ruled 'bump the pin in the same PR' but did not price this third half. How should it land?", "options": [ "A · Land this PR as is and file a follow-up card scoped to packages/spec/** for the citation re-measure, run where a NON-SHALLOW objectui checkout exists (both pin trees are required — each record carries a 'which anchors moved across the hop' narrative).", "B · Hold this PR until the citation re-measure is done inside it — needs the file surface widened to packages/spec/** and a non-shallow objectui checkout; neither exists in this container.", "C · Revert the pin bump. ⛔ Not viable as a way to get green: without the bump the lockstep goes RED with code-drift naming exactly these two codes, because the port is only recordable against an objectui newer than the old pin. The two gates cannot both be green without the citation work." ], "recommendation": "A. The citation re-measure is a genuinely separate, careful job — the gate refuses the cheap repair in terms ('the sha is not the record — the ANCHORS beside it are') and warns that a past re-measure found two anchors that had been wrong since they were written. It needs both pin trees, which this container cannot supply, and 26 files of hand-written cross-repo provenance prose, which is not a bounded in-place fix and is outside this card's binding file surface. C is recorded only to show the bump is not optional: the ruling is structurally right, because the record can only be taken against a newer objectui." }, { "question": "CONFLICT I did not silently resolve: the standing dispatch contract says a claim declaring Clause-②: yes hangs needs:contract-review on the PR in the same stroke as opening it, and check-clause2-carriers --pair 18723 exits 4 saying exactly that the PR carrier is bare. My card prompt says '⛔ Do not apply or remove that label yourself'. Who writes the PR-side carrier?", "options": [ "A · PM hangs it — the card prompt's prohibition is read as covering both carriers, and the PM said they would run --pair once the PR exists.", "B · The dev hangs the PR side — the card prohibition covers only the CARD's label, which PM owns and which is already correct, and the standing contract assigns the PR side to the dev." ], "recommendation": "A for this card, which is what I did: I wrote NO label at all. The prohibition in my prompt is explicit and unqualified, and not writing is the reversible choice — a wrong write mutates a governed review gate, where the gate's own text notes that a strip and a never-hung are indistinguishable in the evidence. Please hang the PR side in one stroke; the gate wants the pair written in one act. If B was the intent, say so and I will apply it on the next round." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed: packages/sdui-parser/src/provenance.ts exists in objectui and not here. Deliberately out of scope — it stamps zero diagnostic codes, so the lockstep code-set comparison is unaffected (26 = 26 with it absent) and the gate does not compare file lists. Taker: none — no PR or person is queued on that file.", "noted, not filed: objectui's index.ts also exports assertFullyLoaded and its codegen emits an eslint-disable banner; neither belongs to either ruled code and neither is carried here. Taker: none.", "NOT a finding of mine, per the dispatch brief: check:cross-package-test-inputs is carded as #18348 (reds on any BUILT worktree). It passed here because I built only packages/sdui-parser/dist, not packages/spec/dist." ] }Generated by Claude Code
2 remaining items
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 20, 2026
Takeover note, director seat (⚠️ Correcting this seat's own ping on PR #18723 (5750580373): the PR's pin
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), 2026-09-20T15:14Z. The maintainer, verbatim, in chat today: 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班,你也接手」. Assignee set toos-project-manager; the card stayspm:blockedon #17429, which this seat has just claimed and dispatched (the pin bump with the re-derived citations, as its own PR — the devx seat's reading at 5718211831 stands: the two gates cannot both be green until the pin moves with the citations).cfcc17d9dd04is ahead ofmain's53ded82bf7a4, not behind it; the blocker is the citations/pin-bump collision, not a stale port. Sequence: #17429 lands → this branch mergesorigin/main(the pin conflict resolves tomain's),pnpm gen:sdui-lockstepre-records at the new pin, the type-check red is fixed, gates, push → at-tier contract review (needs:contract-reviewstays) → ready + auto-merge. PR #18723 stays draft until then.Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 20, 2026
Ruling: batch #200 item 4 · letter A · maintainer 「同意」 2026-09-20T16:03Z
Director seat, summon #25,
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. Presented with the recommendation A (the pin bump lands first as its own PR under #17429 — target objectuiorigin/main≥cfcc17d9dd04, with thesdui:manifestartefacts, lockfile/override state, thepackages/spec/src/**pin citations re-derived line by line, and post-landing console build smoke evidence; then PR #18723 mergesorigin/main, re-records the lockstep at the new pin, fixes its type-check red, is reviewed at tier and lands); B (fold the bump and the citations into PR #18723) refused — it breaks the standing 「pin bumps are never riders」 rule and mixes ~600 objectui commits' console change into a parser-port review. The maintainer agreed 「同意」. Both the takeover of this card (5750664391, maintainer 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班,你也接手」) and the #17429 dispatch (5750664275) stand.Four-facet reading (this seat's own): ① the rule already says so; ② no user-visible difference, but the pin grows costlier the longer it waits (triage, 5690507317); ③ citations re-measured rather than sha-replaced — #10274 found two anchors wrong from the day they were written; ④ two strokes, each revertible on its own.
Execution
#17429 PR → review → ready + auto-merge → this card unblocks (
Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#17429discharged on landing) → os-dev merge lap onclaude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port→ contract review → ready + auto-merge. PR #18723 stays draft until then;pm:blockedstays until #17429 lands.Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 20, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 17645, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/18723", "session": "session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Premise verified against origin/main c5d3d1d8b6 before editing: #18723 did still rewrite the declared single-writer path .objectui-sha (53ded82bf7a4 to cfcc17d9dd04), carrying scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json with it. Restored both to main's blobs and pushed 8a778067eb onto the existing branch (fast-forward, no rebase/amend/force), touching nothing else: the parser port, its tests, the changeset and packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.json are unchanged. GitHub now reports #18723's file list as 9 paths with neither pin file present while #19398 carries both, so the Single-Claim Path Guard collision is cleared from #18723's side. check:sdui-lockstep is red by design ([pin-moved]) and the PR stays draft until the re-record lap after #19398 lands.", "tests": "All run in the dedicated worktree at 8a778067eb (removed after push); every exit code captured by redirect-then-capture, never across a pipe. RESTORE PROOF: per-file git hash-object equals git rev-parse origin/main:path (.objectui-sha a9b031ceea, scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json 8389fcb570) and git diff origin/main on the pair is 0 bytes; origin/main was re-read as unmoved (c5d3d1d8b6) across the restore, and the restore was taken from that pinned sha rather than the shared moving ref. check:sdui-lockstep: exit 1 RED BY DESIGN — self-test passed first, then '1 finding(s) - the two sdui-parser copies have drifted' / '[pin-moved] .objectui-sha is 53ded82bf7a4, and the parity record was taken while it was cfcc17d9dd04'. Not repaired; --update never run. check-single-claim-paths --self-test: exit 0, '65 cases pass'. Its PR-judging mode is NOT MEASURED, reason: node's undici fetch does not honour this session's HTTPS_PROXY, so it died on 'GitHub API 401 for /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/19398/files' — an unhandled crash, not one of its documented 0/1/2 verdicts, so it is not recorded as a pass or a fail. Measured the underlying fact through the REST proxy instead (curl, same token, HTTP 200): GET /pulls/18723/files = 9 paths, neither .objectui-sha nor scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json among them; GET /pulls/19398/files = 19 paths including both. check-sdui-manifest: exit 0, 'present, intact (sha256 49211fee7792, 57 components) and fresh at objectui pin 53ded82bf7a4' — this is the gate that would have gone red had only .objectui-sha been restored, which is why the record file was restored with it. check:nul-bytes: exit 0 over 8813 text files, plus a targeted control-byte grep over the two touched files (no match). react-declaration-parity run as the gate's own header spells it for CI (MANIFEST env + --baseline + --strict): exit 0, 'no new DECLARATION divergence vs accepted baseline'. check:commit-card-trailers --range origin/main..HEAD: exit 0, no card relation and no model identifier in the trailer pair; the pre-push run repeated it on the pushed commit. No build closure and no package test suite is owed: after the restore my diff touches no package at all, both files being byte-identical to main. NOT MEASURED, reason: everything CI owes on this branch beyond the above. dispatch-gates.mjs --commands (asserted with --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack) warned STALE TREE — HEAD at least 318 commits behind origin/main with 100 of the files it derives from changed across that range — and its 61-command list is derived from the previous session's 9 paths, not from my 2-file restore. That staleness is inherent to this round: rebasing and merging main were both forbidden. No ablation or reverse verification applies; this round adds no gate and no assertion.", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write. All GitHub traffic was curl through the REST proxy with GITHUB_TOKEN.", "api_writes": "1 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/17645/comments (this report). Reads not counted: GET /pulls/18723, GET /pulls/18723/files, GET /pulls/19398/files. One non-REST write: git push origin claude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port (8dbd1c68f7..8a778067eb, fast-forward). Two writes the dispatch directed were deliberately NOT made — see open_questions.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "The dispatch directed two GitHub writes that my standing agent-file clauses forbid: (5a) PATCH #18723's body to add a section at the top, and (5b) post a two-line comment on #19398. Those clauses say a dev writes a PR body exactly once, in the POST /pulls that opens it, never by PATCH, and names any later change in the report for the seat to write; and the write budget is four with zero writes outside it. The same file says that where the dispatch conflicts with it the file wins, that the conflict must be named rather than silently resolved, and that its clauses bind whether or not the prompt mentions them — so I made neither write and hand both texts to the director seat below, ready to paste. Nothing load-bearing waits on them: the claim is already released on the remote, and the guard subscribes to opened/reopened/edited/synchronize, so it re-judges #19398 on its next event unprompted. READY-TO-PASTE 5a — insert into #18723's body after the paragraph beginning 'Executes the director-seat ruling' and before the '## Ported from' heading; the body is 14567 chars and carries exactly one session-URL footer today, so re-send it unchanged and read the body back: [BEGIN TEXT 5a]\n## Pin bump removed from this PR (2026-09-20)\n\nPer ruling batch #200 item 4, the `.objectui-sha` bump was removed from this PR on 2026-09-20 and now lands via #19398. `.objectui-sha` is a declared single-writer path and this draft counted as a second open claimant, so the `Single-Claim Path Guard` on #19398 was failing with \"At most one open PR may modify a declared single-writer path\". Both pin-carried files (`.objectui-sha` and `scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json`) are restored to `main`'s blobs as of commit 8a778067eb; the parser port, its tests and the changeset are untouched.\n\nConsequence, deliberate: `check:sdui-lockstep` is RED here in the interim — `[pin-moved]`, the lockstep record was taken at `cfcc17d9dd04` while `.objectui-sha` now reads `53ded82bf7a4`. This PR stays draft and re-records the lockstep at the new pin in a merge lap after #19398 lands.\n[END TEXT 5a]. READY-TO-PASTE 5b — a comment on #19398, not on #18723: [BEGIN TEXT 5b]\nThe `.objectui-sha` collision is cleared on #18723's side as of commit 8a778067eb58d9b79241f6546016ea411c1269c8 — that PR no longer modifies the declared single-writer path (its file list is 9 paths, with neither `.objectui-sha` nor `scripts/sdui-manifest.record.json` among them).\nThe `Single-Claim Path Guard` can be re-run.\n[END TEXT 5b].", "options": [ "A — the director seat posts both texts as given (the clause-prescribed path, and the texts are already written)", "B — the seat amends the clause if a dispatched dev is meant to PATCH a PR body it inherited rather than authored, then re-dispatches this step" ], "recommendation": "A, because the clause exists precisely for a body this dev did not author, and both texts are ready to paste; B only if PR-body upkeep on inherited branches is meant to become a dev duty, which is a rule change rather than a per-card call." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed: both #18723 and #19398 modify packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.json, which is NOT a declared single-writer path, so the Single-Claim Path Guard is correctly silent on it — but it is a real textual overlap. #19398 re-records it at the new pin; #18723 adds inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch to its diagnosticCodes. The merge lap on #18723 after #19398 lands must regenerate it with pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep, never text-merge it. Successor: that merge lap, already required by ruling batch #200 item 4.", "noted, not filed: check-single-claim-paths' PR-judging mode cannot run in this container — its own fetch bypasses the session HTTPS_PROXY and gets 401 where curl with the same token gets 200. Not a repo defect (CI runners have direct egress) and none of the three filable classes. Successor: none." ] }Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 20, 2026
Ruling: batch #201 item 1 · letter A · maintainer 「201 A」 2026-09-20T22:53Z
Director seat, summon #25,
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. Presented with the recommendation A after the #17429 dev round measured that neither PR #19398 (pin bump) nor PR #18723 (this card's two-code port) can be green alone —check:sdui-lockstepis one invariant across the two ([code-drift]without the port,[pin-moved]without the bump) and it sits inside the requiredLint & Repo Gates; the maintainer answered 「201 A」. This supersedes batch #200 item 4's sequencing (5750928995): the ruled direction (bump + port both land) stands, the two-landing shape does not.Ruling — A: the port lands inside PR #19398; PR #18723 closes as superseded
inert-quick-add,member-type-mismatch, thekanban-quick-add.tssource, both test files with their ablation legs, and its changeset.changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md) is cherry-picked verbatim ontoclaude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump; the lockstep record is regenerated at the new pin (pnpm gen:sdui-lockstep), never text-merged; the type-check red sdui-parser: port inert-quick-add and member-type-mismatch from objectui, re-record the lockstep and bump the pin #18723 carried is fixed there.Clause-②: yes(the save gate's diagnostic set grows — this card's own reading, 5714974800),Fixes #17429andFixes #17645, and takes the at-tier contract review on its final head before ready + auto-merge. ItsClause-②: nodeclaration on the card Bump .objectui-sha — the console pin is 584 commits behind objectui main #17429 is corrected toyesby the seat.Claim: director seat (maintainer-directed) · Session:
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE· Branch:claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump(the delivering PR is #19398) · Clause-②: yes · File surface:packages/sdui-parser/**,.changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md, plus the #19398 pin-bump surface already claimed on #17429. This line names the delivering branch so the 「card this PR closes must claim this branch」 gate reads it.Execution, same stroke
pm:blocked→pm:dispatched(the blocker #17429 and this card now share one delivering PR); assignee staysos-project-manager. Anos-devround does the cherry-pick, re-record, type fix, gates and push; the seat updates PR #19398's body and title, spawns the isolated at-tier review, strips carriers on PASS, flips ready and arms auto-merge; then closes PR #18723 as superseded with a pointer here.Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 21, 2026
Claim: objectstack#17645 — director seat, summon #25,
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE, 2026-09-21T00:14Z (re-stated so the carrier reader can parse it; the takeover itself was recorded at 5753263180 under the maintainer's verbatim 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」)Branch:
claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bumpSeat: director
Mode: subagent
Clause-②: yes
Why this comment exists:
check-clause2-carriers --pair 19398reported the pair PR #19398 / card #17645 UNJUDGED because the newest claim (5753263180) named the branch inside theClaim:sentence, which no reader parses, so governance fell back to the superseded 2026-09-17 claim namingclaude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port. The carrier of record for this card is PR #19398 on the branch named above (ruling batch #201 item 1, 「201 A」: the two-code port folded into the pin-bump PR; PR #18723 closed superseded at 5753281831). No state change on this card in this comment; the label clear follows the at-tier review record 5753767727 (PASS on headfc25a5925d).Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 21, 2026
Release:
session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk· 因 = dead claim reclaimed — thedomain:devxseat that held this card (claim 5717581143, 2026-09-17T16:12Z) is offline per the maintainer's verbatim instruction in chat 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」, and its PR #18723 was closed superseded at 5753281831 under ruling batch #201 item 1 「201 A」 · 去向 =session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE(director seat); the card's deliverable is folded into PR #19398 on branchclaude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump.This same
Release:retracts this seat's own two earlier claim comments on this thread (5753263180 and 5753780024 — the second was a repair for an unparsableBranch:line and was itself a protocol fault, row C8), so that exactly one freshClaim:follows. Posted 2026-09-21T00:16Z by the reclaiming seat as the sanctioned hand-over spelling (released session, cause, destination), the shapecheck-clause2-carriers --pair 18319accepted on #17534 (5751072453).Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 21, 2026
Claim: objectstack#17645 — director seat, summon #25, taken over under the maintainer's verbatim 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」 2026-09-21T00:16Z
Session:
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eEBranch:
claude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bumpSeat: director
Mode: subagent
Clause-②: yes
Carrier of record: PR #19398 (ruling batch #201 item 1 「201 A」 — the two-code sdui-parser port folded into the pin-bump PR; at-tier review record 5753767727, PASS on head
fc25a5925d). This is the only live claim by this seat after theRelease:above; assignee unchanged (os-project-manager).Generated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 21, 2026
Release:
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE· 因 = this seat's claim on this card (5753791571) is withdrawn so the carrier reader's cross-author row clears — the offlinedomain:devxholder (session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk, claim 5717581143) cannot post theRelease:row C9 requires, and a reclaiming seat'sRelease:is by construction another author's · 去向 = 让先到者 on this thread's bookkeeping; the deliverable itself is unchanged: the two-code port lands in PR #19398 onclaude/issue-17429-objectui-pin-bump(at-tier review PASS 5753767727), carried asPart of #17645. After that merge this seat closes this cardcompletedwith the landing record under the maintainer's instruction (「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」) and removespm:dispatchedin the same stroke; assignee untouched until then. 2026-09-21T00:18ZGenerated by Claude Code
os-project-manager commentedon Sep 21, 2026
Landing record — director seat, summon #25 (
session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), 2026-09-21T01:00ZLanded, folded into PR #19398 (ruling batch #201 item 1, maintainer 「201 A」, record 5753263180): merged through the merge queue 2026-09-21T00:58Z, squash
fbc12be318de0713e82e1f38ab804b5b63478e64onorigin/main. Verified by content on the fetched ref:packages/sdui-parser/src/kanban-quick-add.ts,validate.ts,types.ts,index.ts,codegen.tsand the two suites__tests__/inert-quick-add.test.ts,__tests__/member-type-mismatch.test.tspresent (each byte-identical to this card's port branchclaude/issue-17645-sdui-lockstep-port, per the at-tier review 5753767727);packages/sdui-parser/objectui-lockstep.jsonrecorded against87af769e9a3ee28ace099fdd653d3ebd79fe82e2and carrying both codes; changeset.changeset/17645-sdui-parser-lockstep-port.md(@objectstack/sdui-parser: minor) present.check:sdui-lockstepexit 0 at the merged head — 26 = 26 diagnostic codes, grammar region byte-identical over 214 lines — measured by the dev (5753538552 on #17429) and re-derived by the reviewer fromgit archiveextracts of both trees.PR #18723 (this card's original carrier by the
domain:devxseat) was closed superseded at 5753281831; the claim bookkeeping on this thread ends with this seat'sRelease:at 5753814287 (the offline holder'sRelease:could not be obtained). Closing this cardcompletedand removingpm:dispatchedin this stroke under the maintainer's instruction in chat 「18723 os-try-charles 已下班，你也接手」 and 「201 A」; assignee left as the closing record.Carried, not closed here — for the next sdui-parser port round: objectui's
packages/sdui-parser/body-dialect.ts(objectui#6771, landed betweencfcc17d9dd04and the pin) has no counterpart in this copy, so an authoredbodykey stampsnot-a-container/ a namedunknown-propthere and the bareunknown-prophere — bothwarning, socompile().okand the save verdict are unchanged; invisible to the lockstep gate because both codes are already in the 26-set. Also still absent here:provenance.tsandassertFullyLoaded/RegistryConfigLike.lazy(zero diagnostic codes). Under ruling #202 B neither is filed as a card: no product landing is blocked and no customer-visible contract moves; the next port round, which will have both trees in hand, carries them.Generated by Claude Code
chore(objectui): bump the console pin to 87af769e9a3e with 27 re-meas…