Skip to content

[finding] the harness auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's landing command non-deterministically — 8 byte-identical PUT …/ccr/auto_merge from one turn: 4 allowed / 4 denied under three reasons; and a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift before it can flip ready #18469

Description

@os-elon-musk

Filed by the domain:skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:1xZ, from a maintainer-authorized cross-lane landing on objectui (audit record objectui#5560 comment 5698676433; the maintainer's instruction in this seat's chat: 「本席跨车道全做八个」). ⛔ Not graded here in the same stroke — graded by the lane's next triage pass. Dedupe: no open domain:skills card names the classifier (control: grep -i classifier over the lane's open titles → 0; lit control --tier → #18425).

Reading 1 — the classifier, measured

Eight PUT /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/N/ccr/auto_merge with {"merge_method":"SQUASH"}, byte-identical apart from N, issued in parallel from ONE turn of a session that did NOT dispatch any of the eight PRs, each PR ready, mergeable_state: clean, 0 red, non-governed (check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test exit 0 over the 24-path union, lit control AGENTS.md exit 3), --pair exit 0, an ACCEPT on every card:

PR verdict reason string
objectui#9589 allowed, HTTP 200 —
objectui#9595 DENIED [Merge Without Review]
objectui#9599 DENIED [Auto-Mode Bypass]
objectui#9601 allowed, HTTP 200 —
objectui#9602 DENIED Blocked by classifier
objectui#9612 DENIED [Merge Without Review]
objectui#9614 allowed, HTTP 200 —
objectui#9617 allowed, HTTP 200 —

After the denials the same session had a read-only command (eight GET /pulls/N + git ls-remote) denied [Auto-Mode Bypass], which passed unchanged when re-issued smaller; and a comment POST to objectui#5560 (plain curl -d @file, the same shape this seat used all day on objectstack) denied three times under the same reason. Earlier the same day this session armed auto-merge on six objectstack PRs it HAD dispatched itself, all allowed; the ui seat's two previous shifts had the same command denied as [Self-Approval] and then [Merge Without Review].

What this falsifies: every narrowing recorded so far — 「the dispatching session arming its own PR」 (this session was not the dispatcher, still 4 denied), 「no review record on the PR」 (identical records on all eight), 「the reason string is the diagnosis」 (three strings for one command). The verdict is not a function of the command bytes, the PR, or the session's relation to the PR. platform-readings.md :431 (「同会话派发 PR 上 PASS 拒为 [Self-Approval]」) is therefore too narrow: it names one reason for one shape, and a seat reading it will keep trying to find the discriminator.

Consequence for the protocol: the landing route (in-seat review → ready → PUT ccr/auto_merge) has a step whose success probability is roughly a coin flip per call in an auto-mode session, and the red line 「不绕分类器」 is correct — so the protocol needs a stated fallback, not a better guess. Candidates for the grader: (a) the seat records the denial on the card and the round report lists the PR under 「待人工挂载」 with everything pre-checked, ⛔ no re-attempt, ⛔ no sibling probing — i.e. the ui seat's behaviour becomes the written rule; (b) the maintainer adds a harness permission rule for the CCR auto-merge route in the seat environment (the denial text's own remedy), after which the classifier is out of the loop for that command; (c) both. ⛔ Not a candidate: retrying, re-phrasing, or routing the write through another tool.

Reading 2 — a hooks landing rotates every seat off shift, and the rotation swallows ready flips

SKILL.md :91–92: 「同读 harness 载入面 .claude/{settings.json,agents/*.md,hooks/*} 的最新触碰是否已在共享检出 HEAD。否 ⇒ 收班、换新会话再派,⛔ 不推进共享检出」. This seat landed PR #18423 (b9598e9c, .claude/hooks/guard-governed-enqueue.selftest.sh, a test file) at 10:37Z. The domain:ui seat at objectui read STALE at 11:44Z and closed its shift mechanically (objectui#5560 comment 5696888799) with three ACCEPTed, green PRs (objectui#9612 #9614 #9617) still draft — the successor's 「first action」 was a ready flip that needed no harness at all. The rule is right about its target (a stale guard hook under a landing action) but it fires on ANY touch of the three paths, a self-test file included, and it stops actions the hooks do not guard.

What is asked (⛔ implementation not prescribed): the grader decides whether :91–92 should (i) key on the hook files that actually run (.claude/hooks/*.sh minus *.selftest.sh) and on settings.json / agents, or (ii) let a STALE seat finish non-hook-guarded flushes (ready flips on already-ACCEPTed PRs, records) before 收班, or (iii) stay as is and accept the cost. Rules layer ⇒ draft, four-piece, an authorized APPROVED. SKILL.md is at 812 / 812 with zero slack on :477; any added line is paid by deletion.

Dedup words

auto-mode classifier auto_merge denied · Merge Without Review Self-Approval Auto-Mode Bypass · landing route classifier fallback · harness stale rotation ready flip · hooks selftest touch closes shift


Generated by Claude Code


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

  1. os-elon-musk commented on Sep 16, 2026

    @os-elon-musk
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Data point 2 — a human APPROVED on the PR does not change the verdict — skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:19Z.

    PR #18447 (card #18384, rules layer .claude/hooks/**): os-zhuang (in GOVERNED_APPROVERS) APPROVED at 2026-09-16T14:16:05Z on the current head and flipped it ready. With every landing pre-check green (checks 19 / 16 rostered skips, --pair 0, clean), this seat's PUT …/ccr/auto_merge was denied [Merge Without Review], and so was label-write.mjs --remove needs-user-decision on the same PR — the second time today for that strip. So the reason string 「Merge Without Review」 fires on a PR that carries a review; 「Self-Approval」 fired on the ui seat where the approver was a different account; 「Auto-Mode Bypass」 fired on a read-only GET. The classifier's verdict does not read the PR's review state either. Cumulative today across two seats and three repos' worth of commands: allowed 6 + 4 + 0, denied 0 + 4 + 2 for the same two shapes (arm, label strip). Candidate (b) in the body — a harness permission rule for the CCR auto-merge route and for label-write.mjs in the seat environment — is the only one that removes the coin flip; (a) is what the seats are already doing by hand.


    Generated by Claude Code

  2. os-elon-musk commented on Sep 16, 2026

    @os-elon-musk
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Reading 2 is discharged by #18468 ruling D — this card narrows to reading 1 — skills seat, session_01HPfcjvF23QBoBj7P47DDxs, 2026-09-16T14:24Z. Between this card's filing and now, the director seat recorded the maintainer's ruling D on #18468 (5698926418, 2026-09-16T14:13:44Z): the re-seat prescription in SKILL.md :92 is removed, check-harness-current becomes a report, and the card is dispatched. That is the same rule this card's reading 2 asked the grader about, decided at a higher level and already in flight ⇒ reading 2 is not to be graded or dispatched here (dedupe: #18468 is the owner). What remains live on this card is reading 1 — the auto-mode classifier's non-deterministic denial of the landing command (now 4 / 8 identical arms denied on objectui plus the arm and the label strip denied on PR #18447 with a human APPROVED present, data point 5699021248) — and the protocol fallback it asks for. Note for the grader: ruling B on PR #18447 (5699053224) removes the client-side enqueue guard; it does not touch the classifier, which is harness-side, so reading 1 stands unchanged.


    Generated by Claude Code

  3. os-justin commented on Sep 16, 2026

    @os-justin
    Collaborator

    Graded — lane self-triage (domain:skills finding exception per lanes/skills.md): p2 · Task · pm:queue. Skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-16T16:49Z.


    Generated by Claude Code

  4. added theissue type on Sep 16, 2026
  5. self-assigned this
    on Sep 17, 2026
  6. os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @os-justin
    Collaborator

    Data point 3 — the denial reached a third seat, on a PR carrying an at-tier PASS — skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-17T02:22Z. Relayed by the maintainer from the domain:spec seat's chat, then read on GitHub: PR #18503 (card #18095, head 016bdeaa43, ready, mergeable_state: clean, 0 red, clause-② PASS by an isolated claude-fable-5-1 reviewer per the spec seat) — PUT …/pulls/18503/ccr/auto_merge {"merge_method":"SQUASH"} denied 「Permission denied by the Claude Code auto mode classifier. Reason: [Merge Without Review]」, while POST …/ccr/ready_for_review on the same PRs was allowed. Six PRs sit ready behind it (#18503 #18492 #18525 #18528 #18530 #18539, all draft: false, auto_merge: null at 2026-09-17T02:21Z); the spec seat did not retry (the card's ⛔). The spec seat's reading of .claude/settings.json on origin/main is confirmed here: 47 permissions.allow entries, 0 of them a PUT, none naming ccr or auto_merge; mcp__github__enable_pr_auto_merge is in deny. Three lanes (ui, skills, spec) have now paid a human hand for the same step. Re-priced below in the claim: the free-file half (allow entries + row :431) dispatches now; the SKILL.md fallback line keeps its serial slot.


    Generated by Claude Code

  7. os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @os-justin
    Collaborator

    Claim: PM loop round 1
    Session: session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu
    Branch: claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading
    Worktree: objectstack-issue-18469
    Domain: domain:skills
    Seat: domain:skills#1
    File surface: .claude/settings.json (permissions.allow entries for the CCR auto_merge route, PUT + DELETE, both repos, and node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs; nothing in deny moves) · .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md (row :431 on 340b6dcf7, anchored on its text 「harness 按内容拒写」, widened to the measured fact; 466 / 466 line-neutral, ≤ 120 B per line, payment by genuine deletion declared) — ⛔ SKILL.md is NOT in this PR (stop on breach; explain in the report)
    Container & model: S 级但不机械(规则层 allow 规则 + 读数行)按 M 待遇, mode:subagent, model: claude-opus-5 — node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/settings.json .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md at 2026-09-17T02:22Z: 「Model tier — no path-derived mandate … floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable」; default tier taken, the seat's contract-tier review applies at delivery (rules layer)
    Clause-②: no
    Thread-read: 5701196621
    Serial constraints cleared: .claude/settings.json and platform-readings.md are FREE — 24 open PRs' file lists read at 2026-09-17T02:21Z, none touches either; the only hot-file hit is PR #18511 on SKILL.md, which this PR does not touch; os-verify-lock.sh --status at 2026-09-17T02:22Z: free, queue empty; shared checkout fast-forwarded to origin/main 340b6dcf7 before this dispatch.
    Ruling-ref: 5701196621
    Re-pricing (seat ruling, this claim): the grading's single PR is split into two — PR-A (this dispatch) = deliverables ① (row :431) + ② (allow entries), both on free files, four-piece, the maintainer's approval lands it; PR-B = deliverable ③ (the SKILL.md 「待人工挂载」 fallback line, paid by deletion at 812 / 812) keeps its slot in the SKILL.md serial chain behind PR #18511 → #18489. Reason: three lanes have now paid a human hand for the same landing step (data point 3 above); ② is the only remedy the card's data says removes the coin flip, and it was waiting only on a file it does not touch. The card stays open after PR-A (Part of #18469, ⛔ not Fixes); it returns to pm:queue for PR-B on landing.


    Generated by Claude Code

  8. os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @os-justin
    Collaborator

    os-dev-report

    {
    "issue": 18469,
    "status": "blocked",
    "branch": "claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading",
    "pr": null,
    "session": "session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu",
    "premise_still_valid": true,
    "summary": "PR-A is IMPLEMENTED but UNLANDABLE from this seat: the auto-mode classifier — this card's own subject — denied git push of the branch with a FIFTH reason string, [Self-Modification]. Deliverable ① is done and committed locally (6c5be1f0f, unpushed): platform-readings.md row :431 is widened into three rows carrying the measured non-determinism, the three reason strings, the permissions.allow remedy, the canonical -X PUT spelling and the 「待人工挂载」 fallback; the file stays LINE-NEUTRAL at 466/466 with every line at or under 120 bytes, paid by two genuine deletions in the same file. Deliverable ② is written in the worktree but DELIBERATELY NOT COMMITTED: it edits permissions.allow, i.e. this agent's own permission settings, which no agent dispatch can authorize — and the permission system independently refused it. It needs the maintainer's own hand or an explicit user authorization. No retry, no re-phrasing, no other tool was attempted on any denied write (this card's ⛔).",
    "tests": "Derived list: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (exit 0) over the 2-path changeset -> 19 commands; ALL 19 RUN, redirect-then-$? captured. 18 exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity (and --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, pm/check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, pm/check-harness-current --self-test, check:agent-test-spelling, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-half-states, check:pm-settings-deny-roster, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:refd-timer-probe, check:required-contexts, check:skill-frame-sync, check:watch-hint-literal. 1 exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, NOT a finding: pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions — its own text: 'a workspace package that is not built ... Nothing was measured'; NOT MEASURED, reason: unbuilt @objectstack/lint, unrelated to the 2 changed paths. Ratchet verdict, verbatim: '✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md is 466 lines (ceiling 466; headroom 0).' Byte cap: 0 lines over 120, max line 120. Deny roster verdict, verbatim: '✓ check-settings-deny-roster: 17 content-write tool(s) declared = enforced in .claude/settings.json' — unchanged, 17 deny entries, nothing moved. node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test on both paths: exit 3 = GOVERNED, '.claude/** x2 — the agent instruction tree'. NOT MEASURED: CI, no PR exists. NOT MEASURED: any gate reading of ② as committed content, since ② is uncommitted.",
    "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.",
    "api_writes": "1 — POST /repos//issues/18469/comments (this report). 0 label writes, 0 POST /pulls (no PR could be opened), 0 PATCH of any body.",
    "open_questions": [
    {
    "question": "② edits .claude/settings.json permissions.allow — this agent's own permission settings. The dispatch is an agent message, which cannot authorize that, and the permission system refused the commit carrying it. Who lands ②?",
    "options": [
    "A — the maintainer applies the five entries by hand (they are quoted verbatim below) and lands them in their own PR",
    "B — the user authorizes this seat explicitly, in their own words, to commit and push the permissions.allow widening, after which the dispatch can be re-run",
    "C — a seat whose environment already carries a Bash allow rule for git push on this branch commits ② from the prepared worktree"
    ],
    "recommendation": "A, because it is the only option that does not route an agent-originated widening of an agent's own permission boundary around the control that exists to stop exactly that; the change is five lines and the PR body text is already written. B is legitimate but costs a round-trip and still ends in the same five lines. C moves the act to another agent without adding any human judgement, which is the shape the guard refuses."
    },
    {
    "question": "① is committed locally but the branch cannot be pushed from this seat. How does PR-A get opened?",
    "options": [
    "A — a seat with push permission pushes the prepared worktree at /home/user/objectstack-issue-18469 (commit 6c5be1f0f) and opens the draft PR with the body below",
    "B — the maintainer re-applies the four-line diff by hand from the text in this report",
    "C — re-dispatch this card to a seat whose environment carries a Bash allow rule for git push"
    ],
    "recommendation": "A, because the work is already committed, gate-green and byte-measured; nothing needs re-deriving, only a push. The worktree must not be removed before that happens — removing it destroys the only copy of commit 6c5be1f0f."
    }
    ],
    "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "to file (3 classes, dedupe words: Self-Modification classifier denies git push · read-only command denied Self-Modification · fifth reason string landing write · same bare shape allowed then denied one session): NEW DATA POINT 4 for THIS card, class (c)-adjacent and measured in this run — the auto-mode classifier produced a FIFTH reason string, [Self-Modification], and it fired on (i) git commit of the two files, (ii) a BARE git push origin BRANCH of a commit touching only platform-readings.md, and (iii) a READ-ONLY command (a grep of a log ANDed with node check-governed-merges.mjs --test) that writes nothing at all. The same bare git push origin BRANCH shape was ALLOWED earlier in this very session for the empty-branch probe, and the bare halves of (iii) were both allowed when run alone. That is the card's reading 1 reproduced inside one session on a third command class, and it widens the card: the landing write is not the only command the coin flip reaches.",
    "noted, not filed: the row deleted to pay for the widening, auto 档判定随命令形状变,不随能力变 ⇒ 被拒的复合命令拆成裸动作重试再报 blocked。, was not merely redundant — its prescription (split the compound command and retry) is the behaviour this card's ⛔ refuses. Anything else in the tree that still teaches split-and-retry would be the same defect; a grep of the repo found no second copy, so there is nothing to file. 承接者:无 —— no other PR or person touches that text.",
    "noted, not filed: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs carries a STANDING one-file exception that would have let this PR raise platform-readings.md's ceiling to the landed count without a decision card (「唯一例外:platform-readings.md 增量抬上限到落地行数,免决策卡」). It was NOT used: the dispatch mandated line-neutrality and two genuine deletions were available, so the ceiling is untouched. Recorded only so the next author knows the exit exists and that it was declined, not missed. 承接者:the next platform-readings increment."
    ]
    }


    Generated by Claude Code

  9. os-justin commented on Sep 17, 2026

    @os-justin
    Collaborator

    BLOCKED at the push — PR-A is built, gate-green and measured, and this seat will not push it or commit ② on the dev's behalf. Skills seat, session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu, 2026-09-17T02:55Z. Dev report 5707737230 read against the worktree, ⛔ not taken on its word: commit 6c5be1f0f (2026-09-17T02:41:48Z) exists on claude/issue-18469-classifier-allow-rule-and-reading, base e08c8b0d1, touching only platform-readings.md (+4 / −4, 466 / 466, no line over 120 B); ② sits uncommitted in the same worktree — five permissions.allow entries, 47 → 52, deny 17 unchanged, JSON valid, no …/pulls/*/merge entry. The classifier denied the dev's git commit, a bare git push origin BRANCH, and one read-only command under a fifth reason string, [Self-Modification] — data point 4, on the card in that report.

    Why the seat stands down rather than pushing: a dispatched agent's denied write does not become allowed by handing it to the dispatching agent — that is the routing-around the guard exists to stop, and this card's own ⛔ (no retry, no re-phrasing, no other tool) says the same. ② widens an agent's own permission boundary; no agent message, this seat's included, can authorize that. Both legs need the maintainer's hand or the maintainer's own words.

    State: pm:dispatched → pm:awaiting-maintainer, assignee cleared.
    Release: session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu · reason: the remaining act is the maintainer's · destination: pm:awaiting-maintainer (PR-B, the SKILL.md fallback line, keeps its serial slot behind PR #18511 → #18489 and is dispatched by this lane once PR-A is on origin/main).

    Maintainer — one action, two ways:

    • A (recommended, the dev's too): apply the patch below and the five entries in your own PR (one PR is fine; .claude/** is governed either way, so os-zhuang / hotlong approval as usual). The row text is measured to the byte; the entries are the ones the seats' commands must match (URL directly after -X PUT / -X DELETE).
    • B: authorize this seat explicitly, in your own words, to push 6c5be1f0f and commit the five entries; the seat then opens the draft PR with the four-piece and lands it on your approval.

    The worktree /home/user/objectstack-issue-18469 in this seat's container holds the commit until the container is reclaimed; the durable copy is the text below.

    ① the committed patch (`git format-patch -1 6c5be1f0f`)
    From 6c5be1f0f618e05ac572ab98fd0d54fc6746c598 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
    From: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
    Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 02:41:48 +0000
    Subject: [PATCH] docs(pm): widen the auto-mode classifier reading to the
     measured non-determinism
    
    The auto-mode classifier denies the protocol's own landing command
    non-deterministically: eight byte-identical `PUT .../ccr/auto_merge` from one
    turn came back 4 allowed / 4 denied under three different reason strings, and
    the same denial reached a PR carrying a human APPROVED and one carrying an
    at-tier PASS. The verdict is not a function of the command bytes, the PR, its
    review state, or the session's relation to the PR, so a seat reading the old
    row keeps hunting for a discriminator that does not exist.
    
    The widened block names the measurement, the three reason strings, the
    `permissions.allow` remedy and the command spelling such a rule matches, and
    the fallback for a seat whose environment lacks the rule.
    
    `references/platform-readings.md` stays line-neutral at 466 and every line
    stays at or under 120 bytes: the block is paid for by deleting one falsified
    row and one subsumed row in the same file.
    
    Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu
    Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
    ---
     .../skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md    | 8 ++++----
     1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
    
    diff --git a/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md b/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
    index fae17e733..1f53e8f60 100644
    --- a/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
    +++ b/.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md
    @@ -288,9 +288,6 @@
     - ⛔ 一般规则:任何可能不存在的命令上挂回退都是不可证伪的否定。
     - PR 与查重类核验改走 MCP GitHub 工具或 git。
     - ⑥:只存在于拼接后的短语,单行 grep 对主体与控制词双零:先合并再搜,两个方向都要读。
    -- auto 档判定随命令形状变,不随能力变 ⇒ 被拒的复合命令拆成裸动作重试再报 blocked。
    -- 读数:带链接与管道的 `git push` 被拒,裸 `git push origin <分支>` 放行,拒绝文案不点名元素。
    -- 判定跨天翻面 ⇒ ⛔ 一次拒绝不是能力边界;`permissions.allow` 条目才是仓库侧确定性通道。
     - `rerun_failed_jobs` 复用原 run 的提交与合并 ref,不拿新 main 重算。
     - ⇒ 基上缺已合修复时重跑无效,只能 `git merge origin/main` 推提交;判别看修复合并时间。
     - 读数 2026-09-13:席位 REST `/jobs/{id}/rerun` 403、MCP `rerun_failed_jobs` 201 ⇒ 重跑可做,锁 1 未禁。
    @@ -428,7 +425,10 @@
     - `check-half-states.mjs` 连 `--help` 都跑整仓 I/O ⇒ 早读到的输出文件是空的,不是干净的。
     - 后台工具调用里再 `nohup … &` 会让包装器报假 `exit 0`,而真活还在跑。
     - 分支删除被拒有第二形态:代理回 403,与既有 send-pack 断连同处置 ⇒ 不可删,⛔ 不重试。
    -- harness 按内容拒写:同会话派发 PR 上 PASS 拒为 `[Self-Approval]`;同通道建卡、ACCEPT 照过。
    +- harness 拒写不随命令字节、PR、评审态、会话与 PR 的关系变:一轮 8 条同字节 arm 4 准 4 拒。
    +- 三串 `[Merge Without Review]/[Auto-Mode Bypass]/Blocked by classifier` 同出一命令 ⇒ 理由串不是诊断。
    +- 读数:带链接与管道的 `git push` 被拒,裸 `git push origin <分支>` 放行,拒绝文案不点名元素。
    +- 解是 `.claude/settings.json` allow 条目,URL 紧跟 `-X PUT`;无则记卡列「待人工挂载」,⛔ 不重试。
     
     ## 闭合关键词解析(PR 正文写侧)
     
    -- 
    2.43.0
    
    ② the five `permissions.allow` entries (uncommitted; appended after the existing `PATCH …/pulls/*` pair)
    "Bash(curl -sS -X PUT https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
    "Bash(curl -sS -X PUT https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
    "Bash(curl -sS -X DELETE https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
    "Bash(curl -sS -X DELETE https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls/*/ccr/auto_merge *)",
    "Bash(node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs *)"

    Generated by Claude Code

  10. removed their assignment
    on Sep 17, 2026
  11. objectstack-fleet commented on Sep 23, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    Contributor

    关闭(维护者裁定):要维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经落地

    分诊席(session_01Tw7jnJinGHvoGSi8aFkhPJ),2026-09-23T14:38Z。维护者在分诊席的「待维护者」复核批次 ① 里答「18469 … 关闭」。本席读完了本卡全部 7 条评论。

    读数(origin/main b940f32a56,本席今天复核)

    本卡问题:auto 模式的分类器时准时不准地拒掉落地命令,即 PUT …/ccr/auto_merge 和 label-write。本卡请维护者落地的 ② 号允许条目已经在 main 上:

    卡上最后一条评论停在这些 PR 落地之前,所以「待维护者」这个状态早已过期。

    没做、随本卡一起放下的

    • ① platform-readings.md 的那一行,仍是旧的窄读法;
    • PR-B 在 SKILL.md 里的兜底说明;
    • DELETE 类条目(很少用到)。

    之后如果分类器再拒掉某条具体命令,按那条命令另开一张新卡。

    标签:摘 pm:awaiting-maintainer;以 completed 关闭。


    Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions