Skip to content

[triage-seat task] one-time priority-signal pass over the objectui pm:queue backlog (~64 cards) — type + queue-membership re-grade #9644

Description

@os-support-ai

Named reader: the triage seat (Routine), next fire. This card is an operational pass, not a lane card — execute during sweep, leave the audit trail here, close when the pass is done. Filed by the skills seat (session session_01WswfK2yNYT9hNnMH6TzAwL) recording a maintainer directive.

Maintainer, 2026-08-18, PM chat, verbatim: 「可派发库存 ~60,至少应该分优先级吧」

Measured context (2026-08-18 ~14:1xZ)

  • objectui open pm:queue = 64, ~59 unassigned; oldest unclaimed card 2026-08-09 (9 days); ~14 new cards entered today alone.
  • objectui merged-PR throughput last 7 days = 378 (~54/day) — capacity is not the constraint; selection is: the queue carries almost none of the signals the selection total order keys on (type, target:, pm:blocking, priority:p0), so high-value and polish cards are indistinguishable and old cards get skipped every round.

The pass

  1. Type every objectui pm:queue card (Bug / Feature / Task — the mechanical boundary test as everywhere). The no-backfill rule is deliberately overridden for this one pass by the maintainer's directive above; new cards continue to be typed at filing per standing policy.
  2. Re-grade queue membership while touching each card — a card untouched for 9 days deserves the exit question: still a real queue card? Decision-shaped ⇒ needs-user-decision (four-facet block); observation-grade ⇒ regrade; obsolete ⇒ close not planned with reason (maintainer can veto-reopen).
  3. Derive pm:blocking from the Blocked-by: reverse index over the objectui backlog while at it (standing cache duty, same read).
  4. Report in the round brief: before/after queue depth, type distribution, cards exited, oldest-card age.

Out of scope: lane-splitting objectui (domain:* for objectui) — deliberately deferred by the maintainer pending a post-pass re-measurement of the registered scale-out triggers; do not mint labels for it.

Activity

os-support-ai commented on Aug 18, 2026

@os-support-ai
CollaboratorAuthor

Ack — executing now (triage seat, session session_01XZ5gajYBe7nCthCPdaTDvq, fire ~13:47Z round). The maintainer queue-jumped this card live in the PM chat (「9644 插队」, 2026-08-18 ~14:1xZ), so it runs in this round ahead of the remaining agenda (main-repo first-touch batch and the objectui bare-finding batch are deferred to the next fire and will be listed as carry-overs in the closing brief).

Read depth for the pass, declared up front: every objectui pm:queue card gets its body read and the mechanical boundary test applied; full comment threads are pulled only where membership looks exit-shaped (stale, superseded, or ruling-dependent). Audit trail lands here when the pass completes.


Generated by Claude Code

os-support-ai commented on Aug 18, 2026

@os-support-ai
CollaboratorAuthor

Pass complete (triage seat, session session_01XZ5gajYBe7nCthCPdaTDvq, executed ~14:2x–15:0xZ under the maintainer's live 「9644 插队」). Audit trail:

1. Type backfill — 66/66 queue cards typed

Roster at execution: 66 open pm:queue (64 at filing + 2 entered mid-day). Distribution after the pass: Bug 35 · Task 29 · Feature 2 (2 were pre-typed: #4259, #3804; 64 written this pass, every one from a body read + the mechanical boundary test). The selection total order (p0 > pm:blocking > target: > Bug > age) is now fully discriminating on this queue.

2. Queue-membership re-grade — 0 exits, and that is the finding

No card was closed or moved to the decision inbox, because every decision-looking card in the queue already carries a maintainer ruling in its comments and is a legitimate execution card: #3743 (ruled C, 08-09), #3917 (ruled B, 08-09), #3906 (ruled b-phased, 08-09), #4018 (ruled B, twice), #4259 (ruled wire-it, 08-17), #4420 (ruled behaviour 1), #4421 (ruled approved + riders), #5123/#5127/#5157 (ruled 08-18), #4914 (ruled B, 08-18). The starvation was signal-absence, not decision-absence — titles read like open forks, so no seat dared claim them; the rulings were on-card all along.

3. State corrections found by the read

4. pm:blocking derivation

No new in-repo edges: every blocker found in this queue is cross-repo (objectstack#9474 / #9220 / cloud#1168 / the closed #4171). objectui#4979 already carries its mark from a prior round. Blocked-in-queue after the pass: #5081, #5126, #5034, #4935 (+ #3804's declared cloud blocker, left untouched — 11 unread comments, flagged below).

5. Bundle recommendations (per the maintainer's live 「同类问题合并开发」 ask)

For the repo:objectui seat to dispatch as single-claimant families (one claim, one PR, Fixes each member): (a) #5091+#5097+#5102 (as any vs declared surface, shared files — serialization required anyway); (b) #5169+#5170 (swallowed-failure pair); (c) #5042+#5177+#5157 (plugin-map config family, #5157 ruled B); (d) #5136+#5160+#5180+#4559+#4319 (mechanical docs/comment corrections, disjoint files); (e) objectos #91+#94+#96 (same shape, that repo's seat).

6. Declared limits

Read depth was body-always / comments-where-exit-shaped, as announced. #3804 was left untouched (11 comments unread within budget; its blocked state vs queue label needs one read next round). Lane-splitting stayed out of scope per this card. Oldest card: #2477 (2026-07-14, 35 days) — real work, kept.

Closing as completed.


Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions