Repository navigation
fix(cli): os build's text face renders every author-time advisory its summary line counts - #18857
Conversation
… summary line counts The advisory block was printed at step 3b, before step 3b-ii appended the per-package survivors to the same `ruleAdvisories` binding the summary line counts. On a multi-package stack that made `N author-time warning(s) — see above` point at a list strictly shorter than N. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DvvamiacK328idtBYJBxV3 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DvvamiacK328idtBYJBxV3 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…byte `check:nul-bytes` rejects every raw ASCII control byte in a tracked text file. The pin's `stripAnsi` carried a literal ESC inside its regex literal, which renders as nothing in every reader and is precisely the class that gate exists to reject. The escape spelling is byte-identical at runtime. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DvvamiacK328idtBYJBxV3
…ild-text-face-advisory-count
…roster `validate-build-gate-parity.test.ts` has held a CLOSED roster since #18491: every bare-identifier call site in `compile.ts` and `validate.ts` must land in exactly one of `SHARED_NON_REGISTRY_GATES`, `BUILD_ONLY_GATES` or `NOT_A_GATE`. The once-guard introduced for the text-face fix was a new call site in `compile.ts` and was classified nowhere, so the file reddened twice — once on "every call site is classified", once on the parity gap it derives from the same set. Measured, not inferred: the roster and the classification assertion both predate this branch (present at its merge-base), and the name is absent from the roster there, so this red was carried by the two commits this branch started from rather than introduced by merging `main`. The guard is presentation: it decides WHEN `printAuthoringAdvisories` is called and nothing else. Every finding it renders is produced by `runAuthoringRules` and `runPerPackageAuthoringRules`, both already classified as gates, and the same list rides `--json` whether it runs or not — so it is a `NOT_A_GATE` row under the presentation reason, not a `BUILD_ONLY_GATES` row: `validate.ts` has nothing to wire, having no "see above" sentence to keep honest. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DvvamiacK328idtBYJBxV3
The unchanged-face claim was measured again from a committed tree, with compile.ts reverted to its pre-fix blob for the before leg and the restore proven by hash. The two captures are 2038 bytes each, as recorded — but they differ in TWO fields, not one: `Build complete (Nms)` and `Load time: Nms`. Naming one of them made the sentence read as a stricter measurement than the one that was taken, and a reader reproducing it would have found a second difference the text does not account for. Both are clocks, so the claim the bullet makes is unchanged: on a stack with no `packages[]` this fix moves no rendered byte. Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DvvamiacK328idtBYJBxV3
📓 Docs Drift CheckThis PR changes 1 package(s): 17 hand-written doc(s) name something this change touched — list omitted above 15 rows. Re-derive on the tree named below: ⛔ 3 release-owned page(s) also affected — read-only, see AGENTS.md Documentation Guardrails. What this run could not see
Coarse fallback — 24 page(s) merely mention a changed package (the pre-#9192 predicate, kept for the deliberately-wide backstop): Which tree this was computed onThis run read A worktree cut from an older # while this PR is open — GitHub drops the merge commit once it closes
git fetch origin faa1a998b97663bbb972ba33829b69a1c48e62b8 && git checkout faa1a998b97663bbb972ba33829b69a1c48e62b8
# afterwards, rebuild it from the two parents, which stay fetchable
git fetch origin 88aa326deb8c0599803643be885708d391ef356e c2562dac95ed642891f2c91c1ac02f9ec3b9479d && git checkout -B drift-repro 88aa326deb8c0599803643be885708d391ef356e && git merge --no-ff c2562dac95ed642891f2c91c1ac02f9ec3b9479d
node scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs --json 88aa326deb8c0599803643be885708d391ef356e
|
…rsession (objectstack-ai#18859) Fixes objectstack-ai#18828 Clause-②: no The claim protocol forbids a second `Claim:` — the rule is this file's own, in the objectstack-ai#17366 docblock at `scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs:378` — and until this PR nothing READ it. A thread that carried the forbidden second line was RANKED, not refused: the governing-claim selector took the newest live claim that parses a branch and printed the loser as `rejected: 1 … a SUPERSEDED claim`, clean and green at exit 0, in the register reserved for a transition the protocol DESIGNED. A writer-side prohibition with no enforcing reader. `claimRepeats` and the C8 row are that reader.⚠️ **This is a RESUMED delivery.** Three commits were already on this branch from a run whose container was killed in its final-gates phase. Nothing it wrote was rewritten and nothing was redone — every item of the dispatch contract was re-verified against the tree, and all three readings were re-taken at the current tip and are dated below. The verified/fixed ledger is the first section. ## What was VERIFIED and what was FIXED Every contract item was found already correct and is left **byte-unchanged**. No code fix was needed; the only commit this run adds is a merge of `origin/main` (the derivation was answering about a stale tree — see Gates). | contract item | finding | |:---|:---| | the reading is a VERDICT at `EXIT_PAIR_ADVERSE` (4), never a NOTE at 0 | **verified** — `C8` is pushed in `pairRows` (:4430); `pairNotes` does not carry it, pinned | | `claimCarrierSelection` stays a pure function of the rows it is handed | **verified** — byte-identical to `origin/main` (sha256 of the whole function `40f59ba86082c358` at both revs) | | `CLAIM_COMMENT_MARKER` unwidened | **verified** — it is *imported* from `check-half-states.mjs` and read through `markerMatches`; that file is not in this diff at all | | `CLAIM_SELECTION_RULE` and the governing-claim choice unchanged | **verified** — byte-identical across revs; every hunk but two is a pure insertion | | SUPERSEDED / RETRACTED wordings byte-unchanged where they still apply | **verified** — no hunk touches them; the fixture control below prints the SUPERSEDED sentence identically at both revs | | every pin (a)–(i) present, each with a non-vacuity control | **verified** — 52 `t(...)` cases in the battery block; the ablation shows all nine directions carried | | battery registered in the roster with its case count | **verified** — :792, pinned at 52, and the block declares exactly 52 | | `SELF_TEST_BATTERY_FLOOR` raised by exactly one | **verified** — 31 → 32 (:806) | | the live census extended for this shape, population named | **verified** — the five measured instances replayed from their real rows, with `objectstack-ai#18559` as the sanctioned-shape control | `rowAuthor`, `laterOnThread` and `claimRetractions` are byte-identical across the two revs as well. ## The before-reading — the fixture control through the exported reader The same two rows (one author, two claims each parsing a branch, no retraction between) through the same exported `claimCarrierSelection` / `pairInputRecord` / `pairRows`, at `origin/main` `88aa326deb` and at this branch: | | `origin/main` `88aa326deb` | this branch | |:---|:---|:---| | `claims` / `live` / `pool` / `rejected` | 2 / 2 / 1 / 1 | 2 / 2 / 1 / 1 — **unmoved** | | governing claim | `7100000002` | `7100000002` — **unmoved** | | `rejected[0].reason` | `a SUPERSEDED claim — it is not the newest LIVE claim that parses a branch …` | byte-identical | | `claimRepeats` exported | **no — the reader does not exist at that rev** | yes | | `claim.repeat` in the record | absent | `1 author(s) holding more than one LIVE claim comment …` | | `pairRows` codes | *(none)* | `C8` | | **verdict** | **exit 0 — nothing refused** | **exit 4 (`EXIT_PAIR_ADVERSE`)** | That is the defect and the repair in one table: the selector does not move, and the thread stops reading green. ## The live count — the five cards and the control, re-taken 2026-09-18T00:44:39Z Read per card through the gate's own `markerMatches` / `CLAIM_COMMENT_MARKER` and `claimRetractions`, not by eye.⚠️ Those threads may have left this state since. | card | `Claim:` comments (author) | `Clause-②-correction:` | `Release:` | the OLD reading | C8 today | card state | open delivering PR | |:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---|:---| | objectstack-ai#18540 | 2 — `os-support-ai` (5719079496, 5720020876) | 0 | 0 | SUPERSEDED, exit 0 | **named, exit 4** | closed | **none** | | objectstack-ai#18677 | 2 — `os-support-ai` (5720104138, 5720190458) | 0 | 0 | SUPERSEDED, exit 0 | **named, exit 4** | closed | **none** | | objectstack-ai#18748 | 2 — `os-support-ai` (5720212595, 5720888122) | 0 | 0 | SUPERSEDED, exit 0 | **named, exit 4** | closed | **none** | | objectstack-ai#18651 | 2 — `os-support-ai` (5721424769, 5721997887) | 0 | 0 | SUPERSEDED, exit 0 | **named, exit 4** | closed | **none** | | objectstack-ai#18778 | 2 — `os-support-ai` (5721425530, 5722028692) | 0 | 0 | SUPERSEDED, exit 0 | **named, exit 4** | closed | **none** | | objectstack-ai#18559 *(control)* | 1 — `os-support-ai` (5721425131) | **1** (5721779100) | 0 | *(nothing rejected)* | silent | closed | **none** | The card's table reproduces exactly. All six cards are now **closed**, and the open-PR column is empty for every one of them: the only open PR cross-referenced from any of these threads is objectstack-ai#18857, whose body's closing keyword names `objectstack-ai#18780` instead — `prDeliversCard` answers `false` for all six and `true` for `objectstack-ai#18780` (the control leg), so it is not paired with any of them. ⛔ The repair of the five is `os-support-ai`'s; this PR only names them, and posts nothing on those cards. ## The escalation probe — the triage's p1 condition, MEASURED The triage marked this p2 because all five instances were one seat self-superseding, and named the escalation condition it had not run: a second `Claim:` from a DIFFERENT session on one card, which would be a silent ownership transfer printed green. I ran it. **Population, read 2026-09-18T00:47:37Z → 00:48:42Z:** every open card on both boards this gate reads — **529 open cards in `objectstack-ai/objectstack`, 413 in `objectstack-ai/objectui` (942 total)**, of which **880** carry at least one comment and were read; **163** carry at least one claim comment. 9 comment lists sit at the 100-comment cap and are UNJUDGED past it, exactly as objectstack-ai#18683 prescribes. 0 parse failures. **The answer is not 0 — it is 12.** Twelve open cards carry LIVE `Claim:` comments from two or more DIFFERENT authors with no retraction between them: | repo | card | authors holding live claims | |:---|:---|:---| | objectstack | `objectstack-ai#13503` | `claude[bot]` + `baozhoutao` | | objectstack | `#14026` | `hotlong` + `claude[bot]` | | objectstack | `objectstack-ai#15811` | `os-bill` + `os-litant` | | objectstack | `objectstack-ai#17852` | `os-warren` + `os-litant` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#4730` | `yinlianghui` + `os-sales` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#7070` | `os-warren` + `claude[bot]` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#7696` | `os-justin` + `os-tesla` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#7804` | `os-tesla` + `os-sam` + `os-justin` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#7848` | `claude[bot]` + `baozhoutao` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#7924` | `os-warren` + `os-sales` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#8115` | `claude[bot]` + `yinlianghui` | | objectui | `objectstack-ai#9370` | `os-tesla` + `os-justin` |⚠️ **This PR is deliberately SILENT on all twelve** — and that silence is pinned, per direction (b). Refusing an ownership transfer between sessions is not this card's to do: it is a different state, it would need its own remedy sentence, and a row that answered both would make one sentence out of two states. This is reported here and in the dispatch report so the seat can file it; ⛔ it is not folded in. ## Who the new exit 4 meets before it lands The seat needs this before landing, so I swept it rather than assuming. Two facts: 1. **No CI job turns red.** `check:pm-clause2-carriers` — the only wiring, `.github/workflows/lint.yml:1140` — runs `--self-test` and nothing else. No workflow runs `--pair` or a sweep, so landing this changes no required context. The exit 4 appears only when a seat runs `--pair` or a sweep by hand. 2. **On the objectstack board: nobody.** Of 32 open PRs in objectstack, **none** delivers a card that would newly earn a C8. Twenty open cards across both boards would earn the row (report-only, listed in the dispatch report), but only one is reachable through an open PR, and it is in the sibling repo: **`objectstack-ai/objectui#9584`** (open, not draft; its closing keyword names `objectui#9499`), which delivers a card carrying two live claims by `os-try-charles` (5663366106 on 2026-09-14, 5690579598 on 2026-09-16). That pair answers exit 4 at its next `--pair`. `DEFAULT_SWEEP_REPO` is `objectstack-ai/objectstack`, so objectui is only ever read when passed explicitly. ⛔ Nothing was posted on objectstack-ai#9499, objectstack-ai#9584 or any of the twelve. ## The reading, and WHERE it is computed `claimRepeats` (:1898) is a **sibling pure reader beside `claimRetractions`, built on it** — the same map decides membership here and for governance, so the pool and this row cannot describe two different retractions. It names every author holding more than one LIVE claim comment, orders them by the file's one recency rule (`laterOnThread`, to ORDER the record, never to pick a winner), and resolves no state, no row and no exit code. `c8SecondClaimSameSeat` (:4380) renders the verdict; `pairRows` (:4430) pushes it as row `C8`; `pairInputRecord` adds `claim.repeat` (:5876, declared in `INPUT_RECORD_PAIR_FIELDS` at :5641) as the READING — one derivation feeding both, so the record and the verdict cannot disagree about how many claims a seat holds or which they are. **MEMBERSHIP first, and that is what makes the state repairable.** The state is read over LIVE claims only. A re-claim after a `Release:` is the protocol working and reads exactly as it did before. And a seat that already wrote a second claim has an act that clears the row: `Release:` what it holds, then one fresh `Claim:`. A rule written over the writing *moment* instead ("no retraction strictly BETWEEN the two lines") would have been unrepairable by construction — nothing un-writes a comment — so the row would have been a permanent red with a remedy nobody could execute. ### The four axes - **实际业务需求** — measured, not assumed. Five live instances on the objectstack board at filing, re-confirmed today, every one of them read green before this row; plus 20 open cards across both boards that carry the state now. The first signal in five occurrences came from a dev reading a docblock, not from any instrument. This is a real shape occurring repeatedly, not a speculative surface. - **项目长远合理性** — contract-first, and no workaround. The rule already existed in writing at :378; this adds the reader that enforces it, in the same file, over the same thread, through the same membership derivation governance uses. No new exit code was minted, no second selector, no second reader of the marker. The prohibition and its reader now live one screen apart. - **防 AI 写代码犯错** — this is the axis that decides the exit. A second `Claim:` re-enters the pool as the newest claim and becomes what every downstream reader is handed — the property the correction key was deliberately designed NOT to have. Rendering that as a NOTE at exit 0 is precisely the tolerant-consumer shape this repo refuses: an adverse fact printed green is how a batch of identical mistakes stays invisible. Declaring the prohibition and not enforcing it is the "声明而未兑现" gap; the repair is to enforce it loudly, at `EXIT_PAIR_ADVERSE`. The row also ⛔ never prescribes WHICH repair — choosing between a correction and a release would be choosing whether the card is being re-taken, which is the seat's judgement, so it names both and writes nothing. - **创业阶段不扩散需求** — the surface added is one file, one pure reader, one row, one record field. It refuses exactly one shape the protocol already forbade in writing and re-blocks no legal workflow: a card claimed once reads as it always did, a re-claim after a `Release:` reads as it always did, a `Clause-②-correction:` is not a claim and never was. The cross-seat question, which is a genuine second capability, is explicitly NOT taken here. ## The pins — per direction, each with a non-vacuity control | | direction | reading | |:---|:---|:---| | (a) | same author, two claims, no retraction | **named, exit 4**; the row carries both ids, the author and both repairs | | (b) | DIFFERENT authors | supersession as today, exit 0 — ⛔ not this state | | (c) | same author after a `Release:` **or** the id-naming retraction | RETRACTED as today, exit 0; the `⛔ NOT superseded` wording byte-unchanged | | (d) | a `Clause-②-correction:` as the later row | silent; the objectstack-ai#17366 exit still reads the declaration off it | | (e) | a DECORATED second claim (bold, backticked) | counted through `markerMatches` exactly as a bare one; the raw constant refuses both, so the counting is the sibling's ONE reading | | (f) | a second claim whose `Branch:` parses to zero branches | still named — the prohibition is on the WRITING, not the parse | | (g) | three claims by one seat | **ONE** refusal naming all three, not two | | (h) | an unattributable row (`rowAuthor` null) | fail closed, as `claimRetractions` does — and `null` never groups with `null` | | (i) | a later same-author comment that QUOTES or DISCUSSES the word | silent — the marker is read at line start | Direction (i) has a control in the wild on this very card: the triage comment 5722477144 contains the word `Claim:` mid-line, and `markerMatches` refuses it — card objectstack-ai#18828 reads one claim comment, so `--pair` on this PR is silent. **Roster line** (:792): `'objectstack-ai#18828: a SECOND \`Claim:\` by ONE seat — the writer-side prohibition, finally READ': 52` — and the battery block declares exactly 52 `t(...)` cases. **Floor** (:806): `SELF_TEST_BATTERY_FLOOR` **31 → 32**, raised by exactly one. ## The ablation Run from the **committed** fix, twice, each leg proving its mutation landed on disk before the reading was taken and proving its restore by an empty `git diff HEAD` and by blob hash — never by an editing command's exit code. `HEAD` blob `3a270ef2eb5f33780e04e4732714f8e88d74a017`. | leg | mutation | mutated blob | result | |:---|:---|:---|:---| | baseline | none | `3a270ef2eb…` | **941 cases pass, exit 0** | | **A** — the repeat detection neutered (a group is never reported) | `72115d2796ead200f93aa855c8ba5820a83f5f8f` | | **23 of 941 failed**, exit 1 | | **B** — the SAME-AUTHOR check removed (the author no longer decides the grouping) | `40cfadd4f5740f34210675ceb998fb2977823769` | | **3 of 941 failed**, exit 1 | Both legs restored: `git diff HEAD` empty, blob back to `3a270ef2eb…`. **Total case count is 941 in all three runs** — the rest of the self-test is byte-identical in its case count, and in both legs **0 of the failures fall outside the objectstack-ai#18828 battery**. Leg A is the interesting one, because it shows the per-direction controls doing their job. Five of the nine directions assert SILENCE and therefore *cannot* go red when the detection is removed — their non-vacuity controls go red instead. All nine directions are carried: - pin itself red: **(a) (e) (f) (g)** - carried by its control: **(b) (c) (d) (h) (i)** — "make those two authors ONE", "drop the retraction", "write that same correction as a SECOND `Claim:`", "give that same row a login", "move that same word to the OPENING of a line" Leg B is the narrower, sharper one: removing only the author test reds **3** cases, and pin (b) is among them. That is the pin which distinguishes this card from the cross-seat question — proof the author test is load-bearing and that (b) is not vacuous. **Self-test count: 889 before → 941 after** (+52, exactly the registered battery). The 889 was measured by running `--self-test` in a detached worktree at `origin/main` `88aa326deb`. ## Gates Derived from the worktree with `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` (no hand-fed path list).⚠️ The first derivation printed **STALE TREE** — the branch was 2 commits behind `origin/main` and 8 files the derivation reads had changed — so `origin/main` was merged in first and the list re-derived on the merged tree at `7424cf3f44`; the `--repo` assertion holds against this checkout's `origin`. **34 derived, 34 run, all exit 0.** Each exit code captured redirect-then-`$?`, never across a pipe. ``` node scripts/check-adr-0087-registration.mjs --base origin/main :: exit 0 node scripts/check-adr-0087-registration.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-changeset-no-major.mjs --base origin/main :: exit 0 node scripts/check-changeset-no-major.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-ci-filter-parity.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-declaration-mirrors.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-declaration-mirrors.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-scripts-symbol-anchors.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-scripts-symbol-anchors.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-self-test-workflow-commands.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-self-test-workflow-commands.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/check-whole-set-label-write.mjs :: exit 0 node scripts/check-whole-set-label-write.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 node scripts/pm/bare-root-worklist.mjs --self-test :: exit 0 pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: exit 0 pnpm check:bash32-floor :: exit 0 pnpm check:changeset-gate-self-tests :: exit 0 pnpm check:cli-command-ids :: exit 0 pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0 pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: exit 0 pnpm check:entry-guard :: exit 0 pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0 pnpm check:parse-guard :: exit 0 pnpm check:pm-clause2-carriers :: exit 0 pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates :: exit 0 pnpm check:pnpm-filter-targets :: exit 0 pnpm check:ratchet-remedy-authority :: exit 0 pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: exit 0 pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: exit 0 ``` Reconciled with `--ran`, exit codes included: **34 derived, 34 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN** — "a DERIVED zero — all 34 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3". Repo-wide `pnpm lint` (`eslint . --no-inline-config`): **exit 0**. The heavy run took a ticket through `scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh` (slot `issue-18828-dev`), queued behind the seat's own `dispatch-gates.mjs --self-test`. `node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair` on this PR is reported in the dispatch report — this card carries one claim comment, so the row is silent on it. `skip-changeset`: `scripts/pm/**` publishes nothing from any released package — the whole diff is one non-published script. --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu)_ --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fixes #18780
Clause-②: no
os build's text face counted per-package author-time advisories it never printed:⚠ 4 author-time warning(s) — see abovestanding over a list of 3. The list grows to the count.The card's reading, re-derived rather than relayed
The card recorded the 4-vs-3 count as the #18677 deliverer's, explicitly not re-driven by the filing seat. It reproduces exactly. Measured on
examples/app-multi-package,compile.tsat this branch's merge-basead1f94e8ec, CLI run from source,NO_COLOR=1:With
compile.tsat this branch's HEAD, same fixture:os buildrenders 4, summary reads 4,--jsonstill carries 4. The mutation was proven on disk by blob hash before each reading and the restore proven by an emptygit diff HEAD— not by an editing command's exit code.⭐ One correction to the card's framing, offered rather than assumed:
os validaterenders its four through a different printer — one line per advisory, no closingrule: ID at PATHline — and it has no summary sentence to keep honest. So "the two doors disagree on the rendered list" is right, but onlyos buildcan carry this defect at all.os lintcannot either:see aboveappears in exactly one place inpackages/cli/src, and it iscompile.ts.Which side moves, and what the chosen side costs — measured
The card deliberately did not rule on which side moves. The list moves, not the count, and the cost of that is measured rather than argued:
packages[])Load time: Nms,Build complete (Nms)Load time: NmsonlyRunning author-time rules per package (N)...step line, and gains the per-package entrySo the only rendered byte this moves is the one the card exists to move. #18769 held
os build's text output byte-identical on purpose; that hold is honoured everywhere except the defect itself.Shrinking the count instead would have made the text face report 3 while its own
--jsonandos validateboth report 4 — the false-clean direction #11529 named one list over, and it would have needed a second binding to count a rendering rather than a set.The pin, and the two controls
packages/cli/test/build-text-face-advisory-count.test.tsasserts an equality read from one run, not a number: the integer in the summary line, the count of entries rendered above it, and the length of--json'swarnings. A fixture that raises a different number of advisories keeps passing; a face that counts a set it did not print cannot.Both directions were run, each from a committed tree, each with the mutation proven on disk and the restore proven clean:
compile.tsreverted to its pre-fix blob, pin unchanged:Tests 2 failed | 3 passed, onsummary said 3; rendered list: … expected 2 to be 3and onthis per-package finding rides --json and the text face never prints it.Tests 5 passed.packages[]out of the fixture and the equality assertions all stay GREEN whilethe fixture reaches the per-package pass and raises a survivor theregoes RED:1 failed | 4 passed. That is exactly the vacuous pass the control exists to refuse.What was rewritten in the pre-existing diff
stripAnsicarried a literal 0x1B inside its regex literal — the classcheck:nul-bytesrejects, invisible in every reader. Rewritten as an escape; byte-identical at runtime.compile.ts, andvalidate-build-gate-parity.test.tshas held a CLOSED roster since [finding]validate-build-gate-parity.test.tssays 「There is no third option」 but its detector matches onlylint*/validate*call sites — afind*-named gate wired into ONE command passes today #18491 — every bare-identifier call site must land in exactly one ledger. It was in none, so that file failed twice (every call site … is classified, and the parity gap derived from the same set). The roster and the assertion are both present at this branch's merge-base and the name is absent there, so the red was carried by the two commits this branch started from, not introduced by mergingmain. Classified asNOT_A_GATEunder the presentation reason, with the argument written next to it: the guard decides WHENprintAuthoringAdvisoriesis called and nothing else, andvalidate.tshas nothing to wire because it has no "see above" sentence.Build complete (Nms)timer". Re-measured: they differ in two clocks —Load time: Nmsas well. Both are clocks, so the claim survives; the sentence now says what was actually measured.What was verified and kept
--jsonbranches return early through the guard, andisExitSignalre-throws ahead of the catch's flush so no face double-prints.^ {4}rule:really does tell an advisory from an error.printAuthoringAdvisoriescloses each entry with a four-space line;printAuthoringRuleErrorsandprintDocIssueErrorsboth indent theirs by six.--jsonleg'swhere-typeof filter isolatesruleAdvisoriesexactly. None of the other five members ofwarningsSoFar()carries awherekey —DocIssue,NavContributionGroupDiagnostic,PermissionSetNameCollisionDiagnostic, the capability-provider pairs and the plain-string undeclared-key list were each read. So the third assertion is sound in general, not only on this fixture.Changeset level, measured on the built
dist⛔ Not inferred from
files[]and not from the file's look:author-time warning(s) — see aboveis present in 1 published file,packages/cli/dist/commands/compile.js;dist/commands/compile.jssha2564999075…withcompile.tsat its pre-fix blob,f1bbb59…with the fix — published bytes move;f1bbb59…exactly, which is what makes the middle reading a measurement rather than build noise.@objectstack/cliis public and versioned and shipsdist, so a changeset is owed.patch: a bug fix in a released package,Clause-②: no— no schema key, no closed-set member, no published export, no registry entry, and no payload key, exit code or--jsonbyte moves.check-widening-tells --declaration noover this diff reports no file on any declared surface (3 NOT MEASURED, 0 tells).Verification run on this branch
origin/mainis merged in (not rebased); both pre-existing commits are still ancestors, verified bygit merge-base --is-ancestorexit 0 on each — a positive reading, which is self-proving in any checkout.pnpm --filter @objectstack/cli exec vitest run --project unit— 214 files, 3048 tests, 0 failedpnpm --filter @objectstack/cli exec vitest run --project integration— 51 files, 427 tests, 0 failedos buildpins, run underOS_TEST_TIERS=nightlybecause the queue population excludes them by name —build-json-advisory-parity,build-json-undeclared-key-parity,build-json-failure-warnings,build-multi-package-artifact,compile-artifact-packages,build-docs-step-count: 6 files, 41 tests, 0 failedpnpm --filter @objectstack/cli typecheck— exit 0. Notetsconfig.jsonincludessrconly, so the test layer is judged by thecheck:test-typecheckhalf of that script, which reports the layer compiling undertsconfig.test.json.pnpm --filter '@objectstack/cli^...' build— exit 0 (the dependency closure).scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstackderives from this branch's own change set, each exit code captured before any pipe.scaffold-emission-typecheckscases reddened in a run that was competing with a gate sweep and was then killed at a timeout, and both pass in the clean full run above.Acceptance notes
check:type-check-debtwas killed by the OOM killer (exit 137 inside its full-repo build, gate exit 3) during a contended sweep. Its own failure text says that is not a pass and not a finding — nothing was measured. It is re-run alone in the final sweep and the reading is in the report.printDocIssueErrorsandprintAuthoringRuleErrorsrender identical six-spacerule:lines, so a text-face assertion that keys on that indent alone cannot tell a doc error from a rule error. Nothing in this PR depends on it, no open PR is heading for that file, and there is no carrier — recorded here rather than as a card.Generated by Claude Code