test(spec): the third ui/ file group's test titles state each cited decision in words instead of a tracker number (stage 22)

packages/spec/src/ui/dataset-filter-nested-relation-list.test.ts

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ const REFUSED: ReadonlyArray<readonly [
 // §1 Both carriers refuse, at the list's own path
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-describe('#20080 §1 — both analytics carriers refuse a list inside a nested relation', () => {
+describe('§1 — both analytics carriers refuse a list inside a nested relation, at save', () => {
   it.each(REFUSED)('DatasetSchema.filter refuses %s', (_label, filter, issuePath) => {
     const issue = issueAt(DatasetSchema.safeParse(withScope(filter)), `filter.${issuePath}`);
     expect(issue.message).toMatch(/requires a single comparable value, but received an array/);
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ describe('#20080 §1 — both analytics carriers refuse a list inside a nested r
 // §2 The carrier prints the analytics door's sentence
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-describe('#20080 §2 — the carrier refusal is the analytics door\'s sentence', () => {
+describe('§2 — the carrier refusal is the analytics door\'s sentence', () => {
   it.each(REFUSED)('%s', (_label, filter, issuePath, field, list, eq, holder) => {
     const door = analyticsDoorRefusal(field, eq ? { $eq: list } : list, holder);
     // The door's refusal is the ADR-0112 class-1 envelope the face throws.
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ describe('#20080 §2 — the carrier refusal is the analytics door\'s sentence',
 // §3 A list the shared schema already refuses is refused once, not twice
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-describe('#20080 §3 — outside a nested relation the shared schema answers, once', () => {
+describe('§3 — outside a nested relation the shared schema answers, once', () => {
   it.each([
     ['top level, implicit', { region: ['a'] }, 'region', /^The implicit-equality comparand on field "region"/],
     ['top level, $eq', { region: { $eq: ['a'] } }, 'region.$eq', /^Operator "\$eq" on field "region"/],
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ describe('#20080 §3 — outside a nested relation the shared schema answers, on
 // §4 CONTROLS — accepted on both carriers, and kept
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-describe('#20080 §4 — what a nested relation may still carry', () => {
+describe('§4 — what a nested relation may still carry', () => {
   const day = new Date('2026-07-01T00:00:00.000Z');
   it.each([
     ['a scalar', { account: { region: 'a' } }],
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ describe('#20080 §4 — what a nested relation may still carry', () => {
     expect(measure.data!.filter).toEqual(filter);
   });
 
-  it('[#20116] $ne carrying a list inside a relation is refused on both carriers, in the door\'s $ne sentence', () => {
+  it('$ne carrying a list inside a relation is refused on both carriers, in the door\'s $ne sentence', () => {
     // This row sat in the table above as "not yet at this save door (#20116)".
     // #20116 routes every slot this walk reaches through the query faces'
     // verdict, so the shape the analytics door refuses on chart is refused here.

packages/spec/src/ui/door-reachability.testkit.test.ts

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ const defOf = (s: unknown): unknown => (s as { _zod?: { def?: unknown } })?._zod
 // derivation or a coincidence. A zod upgrade that changes `clone()` semantics
 // changes the bridge's meaning, and that must be LOUD rather than silent.
 // ============================================================================
-describe('#5056 premise — which zod builders share the `_zod.def` object', () => {
+describe('the derived-clone bridge premise — which zod builders share the `_zod.def` object', () => {
   it('`.describe()` shares the def of the instance it was called on', () => {
     // THE mechanism behind #5056. `clone(inst)` without an explicit def reuses
     // `inst._zod.def`, so a described clone is def-IDENTICAL to its receiver.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ describe('#5056 premise — which zod builders share the `_zod.def` object', ()
 // ============================================================================
 // 2. The three controls, on the instrument itself.
 // ============================================================================
-describe('#5056 controls — the walker finds doors, and only real ones', () => {
+describe('controls — the walker finds doors, and only real ones', () => {
   it('positive: live authoring roots resolve, and the graph is really walked', () => {
     const { verdict, nodeCount, rootCount } = measureDoors();
     expect(rootCount, 'every metadata type plus ObjectStackSchema').toBeGreaterThan(20);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ describe('#5056 controls — the walker finds doors, and only real ones', () =>
 // ============================================================================
 // 3. The #5056 regression boundary itself.
 // ============================================================================
-describe('#5056 regression — the any-one-shared-property bridge stays dead', () => {
+describe('regression — the any-one-shared-property bridge stays dead; a share of the shape decides', () => {
   it('a 2-of-19 shared-leaf shape shares leaves with the live graph but is NOT derived from it', () => {
     // The reverse verification, standing rather than one-shot.
     //
@@ -213,6 +213,6 @@ describe('#5056 regression — the any-one-shared-property bridge stays dead', (
       label: I18nLabelSchema.describe('Display label'),
     });
     expect(cloneOverlap(allSharedLeaves), '2 shared of 2 keys').toBe(1);
-    expect(verdict(allSharedLeaves), 'the residual false-reachable case — see #5828').toBe('derived-clone');
+    expect(verdict(allSharedLeaves), 'the residual false-reachable case — no threshold excludes it').toBe('derived-clone');
   });
 });

packages/spec/src/ui/expression-scope-app-root.pin.test.ts

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ const sentenceContaining = (source: string, anchor: string): string => {
 /** Root tokens that are still true on these surfaces and must stay in place. */
 const SURVIVING_ROOTS = ['features', 'os.user'] as const;
 
-describe('#17203 — no UI prose face advertises `app` as an expression-scope root', () => {
+describe('no UI prose face advertises `app` as an expression-scope root — the renderer no longer mounts it', () => {
   describe('published faces (read by authoring tools and republished into the reference docs)', () => {
     it('`PageComponentSchema.visibleWhen`.describe() does not name `app` among the mounted roots', () => {
       // ⚠️ NOT `.shape` — ADR-0089 D3a made this schema a `.strict().transform(…)`

packages/spec/src/ui/form-layout-inline-grid-retired.test.ts

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ const DOORS: readonly Door[] = [
     layoutPath: ['layout'],
   },
   {
-    name: "ComponentPropsMap['object-form'] (the #5068 props gate's dispatch)",
+    name: "ComponentPropsMap['object-form'] (the props gate's dispatch)",
     parse: (layout) => ComponentPropsMap['object-form'].safeParse({ objectName: 'crm_lead', layout }),
     layoutPath: ['layout'],
   },
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ const DOORS: readonly Door[] = [
   },
 ];
 
-describe('form `layout` — the retired arms are refused with the prescription (#20221)', () => {
+describe('form `layout` — the retired arms are refused with the prescription', () => {
   for (const door of DOORS) {
     describe(door.name, () => {
       it("'grid' → refused, prescribing 'vertical' and naming `columns` for multi-column", () => {
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ describe('form `layout` — the retired arms are refused with the prescription (
   });
 });
 
-describe(`D2 conversion \`${CONVERSION_ID}\` (#20221)`, () => {
+describe(`D2 conversion \`${CONVERSION_ID}\``, () => {
   const conversion = CONVERSIONS_BY_MAJOR[18]!.find((c) => c.id === CONVERSION_ID);
 
   it('is registered under protocol 18 and retired from the load path', () => {
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ describe(`D2 conversion \`${CONVERSION_ID}\` (#20221)`, () => {
   });
 });
 
-describe('D3: the family entry and the chain step are registered (#20221)', () => {
+describe('D3: the family entry and the chain step are registered', () => {
   const step = MIGRATIONS_BY_MAJOR[18]!;
 
   it(`the protocol-18 step wires \`${CONVERSION_ID}\``, () => {

packages/spec/src/ui/form-option-enum-derive.test.ts

@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ describe('ruling 乙 item 1, on real spec enums — each case with a firing and
     });
   });
 
-  describe('a spellable enum row with a labelled inline list (`object.sharingModel`, the #19331 shape)', () => {
+  describe('a spellable enum row with a labelled inline list (`object.sharingModel`, as its form row writes it)', () => {
     const members = servedEnum('object', 'sharingModel');
     const LABELS: Record<string, string> = {
       private: 'Private — owner only',

packages/spec/src/ui/i18n-label-resolver.test.ts

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ const PARITY_VECTORS: readonly ParityVector[] = [
   },
 ];
 
-describe('resolveI18nLabel — rule parity with objectui pickLocalized (#6765 / #6761 ruling B)', () => {
+describe('resolveI18nLabel — rule parity with objectui pickLocalized (ruled: one shared resolver, on the server)', () => {
   describe('the vector table really is the reference\'s behaviour', () => {
     it.each(PARITY_VECTORS)('$limb', ({ label, locale, pick }) => {
       // Asserted against the copied reference FIRST. If this row is wrong, the
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ describe('resolveI18nLabel — the producer-facing return shape', () => {
     expect(resolveI18nLabel({ en: '' }, 'en')).toBe('');
   });
 
-  it('composes with `??` into the producer call shape #6761 needs', () => {
+  it('composes with `??` into the producer call shape the dataset compiler needs', () => {
     // `dataset-compiler.ts:374/406` today: `typeof d.label === 'string' ? d.label : d.name`,
     // which publishes the MACHINE NAME as a display title for a map label.
     const dimension = { name: 'owner', label: { en: 'Owner', 'zh-CN': '负责人' } as I18nLabel };
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ describe('resolveI18nLabel — the producer-facing return shape', () => {
   });
 });
 
-describe('resolveI18nLabel — the rule departures converged with objectui#3907; one departure survives', () => {
+describe('resolveI18nLabel — the rule departures converged once objectui read only own, string-valued entries; one departure survives', () => {
   // Before objectui#3907 (landed as objectui PR #4359) this module's rule
   // documented two DELIBERATE narrowings of the reference. #4359 landed the
   // same two guards upstream, so the copied reference now answers identically
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ describe('resolveI18nLabel — the rule departures converged with objectui#3907;
     expect(resolveI18nLabel(offSpec, 'zh-CN')).toBe('Owner');
   });
 
-  it('refuses an off-contract scalar rather than stringifying it — the one departure objectui#3907 did NOT touch', () => {
+  it('refuses an off-contract scalar rather than stringifying it — the one departure the objectui map-limb fix did NOT touch', () => {
     // `pickLocalized` accepts `unknown` and stringifies numbers/booleans
     // (`pickLocalized(42, 'en')` is `'42'`). This resolver's parameter is the
     // declared `I18nLabel`, so the shapes below are type errors — the
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ describe('resolveI18nLabel — the rule departures converged with objectui#3907;
   });
 });
 
-describe('resolveI18nLabel — the type signature refuses the calls that caused #6761', () => {
+describe('resolveI18nLabel — the type signature refuses the calls behind the dropped dataset label', () => {
   // Reverse verification at the type level. `check:test-typecheck` compiles this
   // file (packages/spec/tsconfig.test.json), so each directive below is a REAL
   // check: delete the argument it guards and tsc goes red on the unused

packages/spec/src/ui/i18n.test.ts

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ describe('I18nLabelSchema', () => {
   // runtime to the same line. Each rejection pin asserts the named error
   // content (issue code + message), not just parse failure.
 
-  it('rejects a lone `key` — the enforcement hole #10492 closes', () => {
+  it('rejects a lone `key`, which used to parse as a locale map', () => {
     const r = I18nLabelSchema.safeParse({ key: 'common.save' });
     expect(r.success).toBe(false);
     const issues = JSON.stringify(r.error?.issues);
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ describe('I18nLabelSchema', () => {
     expect(
       description,
       'no key is generated for any label — a plain string is translatable only where a resolver + '
-      + 'translation slot exist for its surface (#5377)',
+      + 'translation slot exist for its surface',
     ).not.toMatch(/auto-generated/i);
   });
 });
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ describe('AriaPropsSchema', () => {
     expect(result.ariaLabel).toBe('Close dialog');
   });
 
-  it('accepts ariaLabel as an inline locale map — it rides `I18nLabelSchema` (#5728)', () => {
+  it('accepts ariaLabel as an inline locale map — it rides `I18nLabelSchema`', () => {
     const result = AriaPropsSchema.parse({ ariaLabel: { en: 'Close dialog', 'zh-CN': '关闭对话框' } });
     expect(result.ariaLabel).toEqual({ en: 'Close dialog', 'zh-CN': '关闭对话框' });
   });
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ describe('AriaPropsSchema', () => {
     })).toThrow();
   });
 
-  it('does not promise a generated translation key for `ariaLabel` either (#5377)', () => {
+  it('does not promise a generated translation key for `ariaLabel` either', () => {
     // The reporter's second surviving point. `ariaLabel` overrides the shared
     // describe, so it never carried the "auto-generated" sentence verbatim —
     // but it inherited the assumption, and there is no bundle slot addressing
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ function reject(schema: { safeParse: (v: unknown) => { success: boolean; error?:
   return JSON.stringify(r.error?.issues ?? []);
 }
 
-describe('#4001 批 16 — AriaPropsSchema is closed (the door is real)', () => {
+describe('批 16 — AriaPropsSchema is closed (the door is real)', () => {
   it('the controls parse — this suite fails closed, not by rejecting everything', () => {
     expect(AriaPropsSchema.safeParse({}).success).toBe(true);
     expect(AriaPropsSchema.safeParse({ ariaLabel: 'Close dialog' }).success).toBe(true);
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ describe('#4001 批 16 — AriaPropsSchema is closed (the door is real)', () =>
     expect(reject(objectuiAria as never, { ariaLabel: 'x', bogus: 1 })).toContain('these ARIA attributes');
   });
 
-  it('has no `.merge()` riders left at all — the four it had were retired at #4988', async () => {
+  it('has no `.merge()` riders left at all — the four it had were retired with the interaction-config family', async () => {
     // REPLACED WHOLESALE at #4988, not re-spelled. This test used to name five
     // shapes in `animation` / `dnd` / `keyboard` / `touch` and assert each still
     // accepted an undeclared key, because `X.merge(AriaPropsSchema.partial())`

packages/spec/src/ui/inline-action-type.test.ts

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ const legacyTo: InlineAction = { type: 'url', to: '/pricing' };
 const scalar: InlineAction = 42;
 void [fromUnknown, scalar];
 
-describe('[#19920] InlineAction is an inline action body, not unknown', () => {
+describe('InlineAction is an inline action body, not unknown', () => {
   it.each([
     ['a url action', urlAction],
     ['an api action with a static payload', apiAction],

packages/spec/src/ui/inline-action.test.ts

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ describe('InlineActionSchema — identity is optional, unlike a registered actio
  * same-name union. `bodyExtra` is that key — already declared on `ActionSchema`
  * for `type:'api'` bodies, now picked onto the inline shape.
  */
-describe('InlineActionSchema — `bodyExtra` is the payload key, `params` is not (#5777)', () => {
+describe('InlineActionSchema — `bodyExtra` is the payload key, `params` is not', () => {
   it('accepts the showcase submit button verbatim, `{{page.<var>}}` tokens included', () => {
     // examples/app-showcase/src/ui/pages/contact-form.page.ts — the site the
     // #5068 gate reported. Values are template tokens, not literals: the
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ describe('InlineActionSchema — `bodyExtra` is the payload key, `params` is not
  * regression that drops either arm is a wrong instruction again, and the bare
  * "expected array, received object" would keep a `toThrow()`-shaped test green.
  */
-describe('object-form `params` prescribes per action type (#6828)', () => {
+describe('object-form `params` prescribes per action type — its url meaning is retired, not re-keyed', () => {
   /** The `params` issue a parse produced, or a readable failure if it produced none. */
   const paramsIssue = (r: { success: boolean; error?: z.ZodError }) => {
     expect(r.success).toBe(false);
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ describe('element:button declares its action', () => {
     expect(r.success).toBe(false);
   });
 
-  it('carries an api payload through to parse output (#5777, end to end)', () => {
+  it('carries an api payload through to parse output (end to end)', () => {
     // The #5068 gate parses `properties` through this schema, so this is the
     // exact call whose `component-props-invalid` finding the showcase page
     // produced before the ruling.

packages/spec/src/ui/interaction-config-retirement.test.ts

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ import {
 // conditional-type pin in this package was a no-op until #5286 (tsconfig excluded
 // `**/*.test.ts`; vitest never enables `typecheck`), so the compiler-API walk
 // with anti-vacuity guards is the load-bearing instrument.
-describe('[#4988] ui/ interaction config family retirement', () => {
+describe('ui/ interaction config family retirement — renderer behaviour, not authored metadata', () => {
   /** Every name the five modules exported (32 schema/enum consts + 32 types). */
   const RETIRED_NAMES = [
     // touch.zod.ts
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ describe('[#4988] ui/ interaction config family retirement', () => {
     // ── ABSENCE (every entry, not just ./ui) ──────────────────────────────
     for (const name of RETIRED_NAMES) {
       const holders = holdersOf(name);
-      expect(holders, `${name} must have zero holders after #4988`).toEqual([]);
+      expect(holders, `${name} must have zero holders after the family retirement`).toEqual([]);
     }
 
     // ── SURVIVAL (on ./ui, where they live) ───────────────────────────────
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ describe('[#4988] ui/ interaction config family retirement', () => {
       }
     };
     walk(srcRoot);
-    expect(importers, 'a resurrected import means the retirement is being undone — re-read #4988').toEqual([]);
+    expect(importers, 'a resurrected import means the retirement is being undone — these are renderer behaviour, not authored metadata').toEqual([]);
   });
 
   it('runtime namespace agrees with the compiler view', async () => {
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ describe('[#4988] ui/ interaction config family retirement', () => {
     }
   });
 
-  it('the bare `ConflictResolution` name is now published by NOBODY — #4738 left it to ./ui alone', async () => {
+  it('the bare `ConflictResolution` name is now published by NOBODY — the connector-side rename left it to ./ui alone', async () => {
     // #4738 renamed the connector-side enum to `ConnectorConflictResolution`
     // BECAUSE `ui/offline.zod.ts` owned the bare name. That owner is gone, so
     // the bare name is unowned rather than re-homed: the rename is not undone

packages/spec/src/ui/joined-report-block-type.test.ts

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ const reportWithScalarBlock: Report = { name: 'r', label: 'R', type: 'joined', b
 const parsedScalarBlock: ParsedBlock = 42;
 void [fromUnknown, scalar, undeclaredKey, retiredChart, nestedJoined, reportWithScalarBlock, parsedScalarBlock];
 
-describe('[#19920] JoinedReportBlock is a joined-report block, not unknown', () => {
+describe('JoinedReportBlock is a joined-report block, not unknown', () => {
   it('each block typed as JoinedReportBlock parses at the block door', () => {
     for (const block of [openBlock, listBlock]) {
       expect(JoinedReportBlockSchema.safeParse(block).success).toBe(true);