test(spec): the second root-level test file group's titles state each cited decision in words instead of a tracker number (stage 29)

packages/spec/src/root-entry-migrations-split.pin.test.ts

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ function valueGraph(entry: string): Set<string> {
   return new Set([...seen].map((f) => relative(SRC, f).split('\\').join('/')));
 }
 
-describe('the migration chain is `@objectstack/spec/migrations`, not the root (#20646)', () => {
+describe('the migration chain is `@objectstack/spec/migrations`, not the root', () => {
   it('the root module exports none of the moved values', () => {
     expect(MOVED_VALUES.filter((name) => name in root)).toEqual([]);
   });

packages/spec/src/stack-artifact-crossref.test.ts

@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ const SEED_ON_CASE = "Seed data references object 'crm_case' which is not define
 const GRANT_ON_NOWHERE = `Permission 'sales_rep' grants on object '${NOWHERE}' which is not defined in objects.`;
 const SEED_ON_NOWHERE = `Seed data references object '${NOWHERE}' which is not defined in objects.`;
 
-describe('#18202 — the per-stack pass, without the opt-in', () => {
+describe('the per-stack pass, without the opt-in', () => {
   it('REFUSES an app-owned grant and seed on a module-owned object — the reported defect', () => {
     const refused = refusalOf(() => defineStack(appConfig('crm_case', 'crm_case')));
     expect(refused?.code).toBe('STACK_CROSS_REFERENCE_INVALID');
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ describe('#18202 — the per-stack pass, without the opt-in', () => {
   });
 });
 
-describe('#18202 — `artifactObjects` widens exactly the two ARTIFACT-SCOPED classes', () => {
+describe('`artifactObjects` widens exactly the two ARTIFACT-SCOPED classes', () => {
   it('ACCEPTS the app package once the artifact’s other objects are declared', () => {
     const service = serviceStack();
     const accepted = refusalOf(() =>
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ describe('#18202 — `artifactObjects` widens exactly the two ARTIFACT-SCOPED cl
   });
 });
 
-describe('#18202 — the ARTIFACT pass: the refusal MOVED, it did not disappear', () => {
+describe('the ARTIFACT pass: the refusal MOVED, it did not disappear', () => {
   /** The opt-in is a promise about a composition; this is the composition calling it in. */
   const composeClaiming = (name: string) => {
     const service = serviceStack();
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ describe('#18202 — the ARTIFACT pass: the refusal MOVED, it did not disappear'
   });
 });
 
-describe('#18202 — #14122 §6 compatibility: a stack that does not opt in is untouched', () => {
+describe('compatibility with the multi-package artifact: a stack that does not opt in is untouched', () => {
   it('a single-package stack still refuses its own dangling grant', () => {
     const refused = refusalOf(() =>
       defineStack(anyStack({
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ describe('#18202 — #14122 §6 compatibility: a stack that does not opt in is u
   });
 });
 
-describe('#18202 — the object-less leniency the ARTIFACT pass inherits verbatim', () => {
+describe('the object-less leniency the ARTIFACT pass inherits verbatim', () => {
   /**
    * hotcrm#1449's shape: the app package declares NO objects, so
    * `validateCrossReferences` early-returns and the ARTIFACT pass skips it for
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ describe('#18202 — the object-less leniency the ARTIFACT pass inherits verbati
  * it, `collectArtifactCrossReferenceErrors`'s docstring says it, and these
  * fixtures hold it.
  */
-describe('#18202 — an input that bypassed the strict parse IS checked at composition', () => {
+describe('an input that bypassed the strict parse IS checked at composition', () => {
   /** The app package as an unparsed stack: `strict: false` skips every validation. */
   const unparsedApp = (grantObject: string, seedObject: string) =>
     defineStack(appConfig(grantObject, seedObject), { strict: false });
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ describe('#18202 — an input that bypassed the strict parse IS checked at compo
     expect(refused?.issues).toContain(SEED_ON_NOWHERE);
   });
 
-  it('REFUSES a hand-built stack object before either rule runs — it was never built (#20367 ruling B)', () => {
+  it('REFUSES a hand-built stack object before either rule runs — it was never built by a stack producer', () => {
     // Since ruling B a hand-built object no longer reaches the artifact pass:
     // `composeStacks` refuses an input no stack producer built at its step 0,
     // naming the input, so the two rules above never get to run on it. The
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ describe('#18202 — an input that bypassed the strict parse IS checked at compo
  * before this pass runs — skipping it composed an artifact without that
  * stack's grants or seed rows — so those two cases assert the refusal.
  */
-describe('#18202 — a malformed collection on an unparsed input is skipped or refused, never a bare TypeError', () => {
+describe('a malformed collection on an unparsed input is skipped or refused, never a bare TypeError', () => {
   /** Collect `console.warn` for one call, restoring the real one afterwards. */
   function warningsDuring(run: () => unknown): { warnings: string[]; thrown: Envelope | null } {
     const warnings: string[] = [];
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ describe('#18202 — a malformed collection on an unparsed input is skipped or r
   const composeWith = (stack: ReturnType<typeof defineStack>) => () =>
     composeStacks([serviceStack(), stack], { manifest: 'preserve' });
 
-  it('a non-array `permissions` is refused by the concat pass, never a bare TypeError (#19784)', () => {
+  it('a non-array `permissions` is refused by the concat pass, never a bare TypeError', () => {
     // Map format written onto a built stack (only `defineStack` normalizes it). It
     // is NOT iterable, which is what makes this the case that distinguishes a
     // guard from a bare `TypeError`: a string value would iterate its
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ describe('#18202 — a malformed collection on an unparsed input is skipped or r
     expect(thrown?.status).toBe(422);
   });
 
-  it('a non-array `data` is refused by the concat pass, never a bare TypeError (#19784)', () => {
+  it('a non-array `data` is refused by the concat pass, never a bare TypeError', () => {
     const { thrown } = warningsDuring(composeWith(malformed({ data: 42 })));
     expect(thrown?.code).toBe('STACK_SCHEMA_INVALID');
     expect(thrown?.status).toBe(422);
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ describe('#18202 — a malformed collection on an unparsed input is skipped or r
  * This block is the fence on that qualifier: if the early return is ever
  * removed, the qualifier becomes wrong and these tests say so.
  */
-describe('#18202 — a composition of ONE package never reaches the artifact pass', () => {
+describe('a composition of ONE package never reaches the artifact pass', () => {
   const claiming = () => defineStack(appConfig(NOWHERE, NOWHERE), { artifactObjects: [NOWHERE] });
 
   it('accepts a one-input composition whose claim names an object nothing defines', () => {

packages/spec/src/stack-artifact-packages.test.ts

@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ describe('ADR-0130 D4 — each `packages` entry is an OBJECT wrapping its manife
     expect(issueAt(result, ['packages'])?.code).toBe('invalid_type');
   });
 
-  it('refuses `packages: null` — `.optional()` admits `undefined`, not `null` (#19926)', () => {
+  it('refuses `packages: null` — `.optional()` admits `undefined`, not `null`', () => {
     // `null` is a present, non-array `packages`: malformed, not absent. Every
     // reader of the key refuses it too (`INVALID_ARTIFACT_PACKAGES`); the rule
     // is stated once, beside `AssembledPackageBodySchema`.
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ describe('ADR-0130 D4 — `packages` has a declared composition rule', () => {
     ]);
   });
 
-  it('refuses `packages: null` on any input when composing two or more stacks (#19926)', () => {
+  it('refuses `packages: null` on any input when composing two or more stacks', () => {
     // The concat pass skips `undefined` alone: `null` is malformed, not
     // absent, and is refused with the strict parse's own envelope rather than
     // composed as if the stack declared no packages. `strict: false` is the
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ describe('ADR-0130 D4 — `packages` has a declared composition rule', () => {
     expect(composed.packages.map((p) => p.manifest.id)).toEqual(['com.example.crm.cpq']);
   });
 
-  it('does not warn about an undeclared composition rule (#5005 rule 3)', () => {
+  it('does not warn about an undeclared composition rule', () => {
     composeStacks([
       raw({ manifest: crmManifest, packages: [{ manifest: crmManifest }] }),
       raw({ manifest: cpqManifest }),

packages/spec/src/stack-cross-reference-envelope.test.ts

@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ const stackWith = (extra: Record<string, unknown>) =>
  */
 const rows: Array<{ label: string; config: Record<string, unknown>; message: string }> = [
   {
-    label: 'hooks[].object (#14122 §4 rule R4)',
+    label: 'hooks[].object (the hook-ownership rule)',
     config: {
       hooks: [{ name: 'probe_hook', object: MISSING, events: ['afterInsert'], handler: 'noop' }],
     },
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ const rows: Array<{ label: string; config: Record<string, unknown>; message: str
   },
 ];
 
-describe('#14552 — defineStack cross-reference refusals carry an ADR-0112 envelope', () => {
+describe('defineStack cross-reference refusals carry an ADR-0112 envelope', () => {
   for (const row of rows) {
     describe(row.label, () => {
       it('refuses with code STACK_CROSS_REFERENCE_INVALID and status 422', () => {

packages/spec/src/stack-dev-logins.test.ts

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ const issuesOf = (verdict: ReturnType<typeof parse>): string[] =>
 
 // ─── GREEN — what is writable now, and was not before ───────────────
 
-describe('#17556 accept — an application may declare its own first-run credentials', () => {
+describe('accept — an application may declare its own first-run credentials', () => {
   it('accepts a full `devLogins` entry and carries every field through the parse', () => {
     const verdict = parse({
       ...base(),
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ describe('#17556 accept — an application may declare its own first-run credent
 
 // ─── RED — the entry is strict from birth, and says so usefully ─────
 
-describe('#17556 refuse — a `devLogins` entry is closed against unknown keys', () => {
+describe('refuse — a `devLogins` entry is closed against unknown keys', () => {
   it('refuses an undeclared key inside an entry, at the entry`s path', () => {
     const verdict = parse({ ...base(), devLogins: [{ email: 'a@b.example', totallyBogus: 1 }] });
     expect(verdict.success).toBe(false);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ describe('#17556 refuse — a `devLogins` entry is closed against unknown keys',
 
 // ─── DARK CONTROL — the door did not open, two keys were declared ───
 
-describe('#17556 control — the top-level door is still strict everywhere else', () => {
+describe('control — the top-level door is still strict everywhere else', () => {
   it('a neighbouring undeclared key still refuses, so the accept above is about these two keys', () => {
     // If this went green the reading "devHint/devLogins are now writable" would
     // be indistinguishable from "the strict close regressed".
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ describe('#17556 control — the top-level door is still strict everywhere else'
 
 // ─── COMPOSITION — both publishers' personas survive; hints refuse ──
 
-describe('#17556 compose — personas concatenate, a contradicting hint is named', () => {
+describe('compose — personas concatenate, a contradicting hint is named', () => {
   const hiring = () => defineStack({
     manifest,
     devHint: 'seed first',

packages/spec/src/stack-email-template-locale-floor.test.ts

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ afterEach(() => {
   vi.restoreAllMocks();
 });
 
-describe('#17614 — the floor tag is one named constant, not two spellings', () => {
+describe('the floor tag is one named constant, not two spellings', () => {
   it('is the schema default for `locale`, so a row that omits the key HAS the floor', () => {
     expect(EMAIL_TEMPLATE_FLOOR_LOCALE).toBe('en-US');
     const parsed = EmailTemplateDefinitionSchema.parse({
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ describe('#17614 — the floor tag is one named constant, not two spellings', ()
   // A published declaration promising a loud permanent refusal where the
   // runtime performs a silent fill is the defect; both call shapes must stay
   // named, so the promise cannot quietly go unconditional again.
-  it('[#18056] scopes the dead-letter promise to a call that NAMES a locale, and states the other case', () => {
+  it('scopes the dead-letter promise to a call that NAMES a locale, and states the other case', () => {
     const text = String(EmailTemplateDefinitionSchema.shape.locale.description ?? '');
     expect(text).toMatch(/NAMES a locale/);
     expect(text).toMatch(/lowest locale tag/);
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ describe('#17614 — the floor tag is one named constant, not two spellings', ()
   });
 });
 
-describe('#17614 — defineStack reports a bundle with no `en-US` floor', () => {
+describe('defineStack reports a bundle with no `en-US` floor', () => {
   it('reports the trap: every supportedLocales tag authored, none of them the floor', () => {
     const { warns, value } = warningsOf(stack(['en', 'zh-CN', 'ja-JP', 'es-ES'].map((l) => tpl(l)), THE_TRAP));
     const hits = floorWarns(warns);
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ describe('#17614 — defineStack reports a bundle with no `en-US` floor', () =>
   });
 });
 
-describe('#17614 — and stays silent where the bundle HAS a floor (the controls)', () => {
+describe('and stays silent where the bundle HAS a floor (the controls)', () => {
   // ⛔ Every case in THIS block is a bundle that genuinely carries the floor
   // row. The shapes that are floorless and silent anyway are the guard's scope
   // boundary and live in their own block below — filing them here read as
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ describe('#17614 — and stays silent where the bundle HAS a floor (the controls
 
 });
 
-describe('#17614 — warn-once bookkeeping', () => {
+describe('the no-floor report: warn-once bookkeeping', () => {
   it('warns once for one bundle, however many times the same stack is defined', () => {
     const first = warningsOf(stack([tpl('pt-BR')], { defaultLocale: 'pt-BR', supportedLocales: ['pt-BR'] }));
     const second = warningsOf(stack([tpl('pt-BR')], { defaultLocale: 'pt-BR', supportedLocales: ['pt-BR'] }));
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ describe('#17614 — warn-once bookkeeping', () => {
 // enforce-or-remove question and is not decided here; what is closed is the
 // silence being undeclared and unpinned.
 
-describe('#18056 — the guard\'s declared scope boundary', () => {
+describe('the floor guard\'s declared scope boundary', () => {
   it('early return 1: a stack with no `i18n` block is never examined, floorless or not', () => {
     const { warns, value } = warningsOf(stack([tpl('en', 'acme.scope_no_i18n')]));
     expect(floorWarns(warns)).toEqual([]);