Skip to content

docs(contributing): add the ladder, good-first-issue link - #127

Merged
jothimani-rajendran merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
launch/block3
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

docs(contributing): add the ladder, good-first-issue link#127
jothimani-rajendran merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
launch/block3

Conversation

@jothimani-rajendran

@jothimani-rajendran jothimani-rajendran commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What this changes

Adds the shared contribution ladder (## The ladder) to CONTRIBUTING.md, placed between
"Adding an agent adapter" and the existing "Contributing evidence" section so it frames that
section instead of duplicating it. Adds the seeded good-first-issue link under "What this
project is". Names the mechanism that filters low-effort or machine-generated PRs (DCO
sign-off plus this repo's own dco and no-private-data CI checks) rather than moralising
about it.

agentseam already had the fullest contributor-plumbing set in the org (SECURITY.md,
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, CITATION.cff, llms.txt, .github/CODEOWNERS,
.github/dependabot.yml, and all six issue templates), so this PR touches only
CONTRIBUTING.md — nothing else was added or changed.

One fact checked rather than assumed: the capability matrix has 16 agents
(len(matrix.MATRIX) against src/agentseam/matrix.py), matching what CONTRIBUTING.md and
the evidence-report template already say ("twelve of sixteen"); no correction was needed there.

Claim check

Not applicable — no adapter or matrix change.

Checks

  • pytest -q passes (1598 passed, 4 skipped)
  • ruff check . and ruff format --check . pass
  • Runtime path is still stdlib-only (docs-only change)
  • Commits are signed off (git commit -s)

Notes for the reviewer

Deviation from the shared brief: the brief's boilerplate AI-contribution paragraph names "this
repo's own chock policies" as the mechanism. agentseam doesn't run chock against itself — it's
the layer chock is built on, not a chock consumer — so I named the mechanism this repo actually
runs (the dco and no-private-data CI jobs) instead of claiming a tool this repo has no
evidence of using on its own PRs, consistent with the file's own "never claim an enforcement a
vendor cannot deliver" rule.

Frame agentseam's existing evidence section with the shared five-rung
contribution ladder rather than duplicating it, point newcomers at the
seeded good-first-issue list, and name the mechanism (DCO plus this
repo's own dco/no-private-data CI checks) that filters low-effort or
machine-generated PRs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@jothimani-rajendran
jothimani-rajendran marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2026 11:11
@jothimani-rajendran
jothimani-rajendran merged commit 519391a into main Sep 9, 2026
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants