docs(contributing): add the ladder, good-first-issue link - #127
Merged
Conversation
Frame agentseam's existing evidence section with the shared five-rung contribution ladder rather than duplicating it, point newcomers at the seeded good-first-issue list, and name the mechanism (DCO plus this repo's own dco/no-private-data CI checks) that filters low-effort or machine-generated PRs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
jothimani-rajendran
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 9, 2026 11:11
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
Adds the shared contribution ladder (
## The ladder) toCONTRIBUTING.md, placed between"Adding an agent adapter" and the existing "Contributing evidence" section so it frames that
section instead of duplicating it. Adds the seeded good-first-issue link under "What this
project is". Names the mechanism that filters low-effort or machine-generated PRs (DCO
sign-off plus this repo's own
dcoandno-private-dataCI checks) rather than moralisingabout it.
agentseam already had the fullest contributor-plumbing set in the org (
SECURITY.md,CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md,CITATION.cff,llms.txt,.github/CODEOWNERS,.github/dependabot.yml, and all six issue templates), so this PR touches onlyCONTRIBUTING.md— nothing else was added or changed.One fact checked rather than assumed: the capability matrix has 16 agents
(
len(matrix.MATRIX)againstsrc/agentseam/matrix.py), matching whatCONTRIBUTING.mdandthe evidence-report template already say ("twelve of sixteen"); no correction was needed there.
Claim check
Not applicable — no adapter or matrix change.
Checks
pytest -qpasses (1598 passed, 4 skipped)ruff check .andruff format --check .passgit commit -s)Notes for the reviewer
Deviation from the shared brief: the brief's boilerplate AI-contribution paragraph names "this
repo's own chock policies" as the mechanism. agentseam doesn't run chock against itself — it's
the layer chock is built on, not a chock consumer — so I named the mechanism this repo actually
runs (the
dcoandno-private-dataCI jobs) instead of claiming a tool this repo has noevidence of using on its own PRs, consistent with the file's own "never claim an enforcement a
vendor cannot deliver" rule.