feat(meta_provider): add multi-provider evaluation strategies#102
feat(meta_provider): add multi-provider evaluation strategies#102josecolella merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Add FirstSuccessful, Comparison, and custom (Base) strategies to the MetaProvider, reaching parity with the JS/Go SDK implementations. Resolves open-feature/ruby-sdk#212. Changes: - Refactor inline strategy logic into Strategy pattern (Base, FirstMatch, FirstSuccessful, Comparison) - Add missing fetch_integer_value and fetch_float_value methods - Add track delegation to wrapped providers - Use define_method to DRY up the 6 fetch methods - Bump openfeature-sdk dependency to >= 0.4.0, < 1.0 - Bump version to 0.1.0 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Jose Colella <jose.colella@gusto.com>
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the OpenFeature MetaProvider by introducing a robust strategy pattern for flag evaluation. It expands the provider's capabilities with new 'FirstSuccessful' and 'Comparison' strategies, alongside support for custom evaluation logic. The update also adds comprehensive support for integer and float flag types and ensures event tracking is delegated across all underlying providers, making the MetaProvider more powerful and aligned with other SDKs. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is an excellent improvement, refactoring the MetaProvider to use a Strategy pattern for evaluation. The introduction of FirstSuccessful and Comparison strategies, along with support for custom strategies, significantly enhances the provider's flexibility and brings it to parity with other OpenFeature SDKs. The code is much cleaner and more maintainable, especially with the use of define_method to DRY up the fetch logic. The added tests are comprehensive and the documentation updates are clear and helpful. I have one minor suggestion to improve the clarity of the new Comparison strategy.
| results = [] | ||
| errors = [] | ||
|
|
||
| providers.each do |provider| | ||
| details = fetch_block.call(provider) | ||
|
|
||
| if details.error_code.nil? | ||
| results << add_provider_metadata(details, provider) | ||
| else | ||
| errors << {provider: provider.metadata.name, error_code: details.error_code} | ||
| end | ||
| rescue => e | ||
| errors << {provider: provider.metadata.name, error_code: e.message} | ||
| end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The errors array is initialized and populated, but its value is never used. This adds unnecessary complexity and can be confusing for future maintainers. The logic can be simplified by removing the errors array and only collecting successful results, while continuing to ignore providers that return an error or raise an exception.
results = []
providers.each do |provider|
begin
details = fetch_block.call(provider)
results << add_provider_metadata(details, provider) if details.error_code.nil?
rescue StandardError
# Ignore providers that error or raise; they are excluded from comparison.
end
end2 participants
Summary
MetaProvider, reaching parity with the JS/Go SDK implementationsfetch_integer_valueandfetch_float_valuemethodstrackdelegation to all wrapped providers that support itdefine_methodto DRY up the 6 fetch methodsopenfeature-sdkdependency to>= 0.4.0, < 1.0and version to0.1.0strategy: :first_matchdefault)Resolves open-feature/ruby-sdk#212
Test plan
strategy: :first_matchdefault behavior identical🤖 Jose's AI agent