Skip to content

Improve README structure: add missing Installation, Usage, Development section(s) [Generated by gurnben's Agent]#246

Open
gurnben wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift-online:mainfrom
gurnben:readme-and-docs-improvements
Open

Improve README structure: add missing Installation, Usage, Development section(s) [Generated by gurnben's Agent]#246
gurnben wants to merge 2 commits into
openshift-online:mainfrom
gurnben:readme-and-docs-improvements

Conversation

@gurnben
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gurnben gurnben commented Apr 20, 2026

Summary

Adds missing README sections to improve documentation structure.

Changes

  • Appends missing Installation, Usage, and/or Development sections to the existing README.md
  • All content is derived from this repository's actual build system, dependencies, and code structure

AgentReady Score Impact

This PR is part of an organization-wide initiative to improve AI-assisted development readiness across openshift-online, measured by AgentReady (v2.31.2).

Metric Value
Current score 31.0/100 (Needs Improvement)
This PR +10 points
Score after this PR 41/100 (Bronze)
All open PRs combined +32 points63/100 (Silver)

Attributes addressed by this PR

  • README Structure (+10)

Context

AgentReady checks for three essential README sections: Installation, Usage, and Development. This PR adds only the sections that were missing — existing content is preserved unchanged.

Testing

  • No functional code changes — documentation only
  • README renders correctly on GitHub

:robot_face: This PR was generated by an AI agent (Claude) as part of an organization-wide initiative to improve AI-assisted development readiness across openshift-online. The agent assessed all 32 public repositories using AgentReady, identified improvement opportunities, generated the changes, and opened this PR. All commits are GPG-signed by @gurnben.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from ahitacat April 20, 2026 18:10
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gurnben
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign vkareh for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from nimrodshn April 20, 2026 18:10
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gurnben has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 55 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: c6656ffd-f654-457b-9f31-4928213811b5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2420432 and fb1af8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 55 minutes and 53 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gurnben gurnben changed the title Improve README structure: add missing Installation, Usage, Development section(s) Improve README structure: add missing Installation, Usage, Development section(s) [Generated by gurnben's Agent] Apr 21, 2026
Comment thread README.md Outdated
./ocm-metamodel-tool generate --model=/path/to/ocm-api-model/model --output=/path/to/output
```

Run `./ocm-metamodel-tool --help` for all available commands and options.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this accurate? 🤔 I dont believe it is..

This tool isn't ment to be used alone but coupled with the SDK and model projects.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch -- you're right that ocm-metamodel-tool is primarily used as part of the SDK/model generation pipeline rather than invoked standalone. I can update this Usage section to reflect that context, something like:

## Usage

This tool is used as part of the OCM SDK and API model code generation pipeline.
It processes model definitions from [ocm-api-model](https://github.com/openshift-online/ocm-api-model)
and generates Go source code for [ocm-sdk-go](https://github.com/openshift-online/ocm-sdk-go).

See the ocm-api-model and ocm-sdk-go repositories for the full generation workflow.

Would that be more accurate? Happy to adjust to whatever best describes the intended usage.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Replaces the inaccurate standalone CLI usage example with a
description of how the tool fits into the OCM SDK/model code
generation pipeline, as discussed with @nimrodshn.

Also fixes the binary name comment and expands test targets
to match the actual Makefile.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants