Skip to content

Conversation

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

@ggiguash ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ggiguash: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66414, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jogeo

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

/test ?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jogeo January 6, 2026 15:03
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@ggiguash: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ai-model-serving
/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance
/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm
/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
/test test-rpm
/test test-unit
/test verify
/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test images
/test security
/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-rebase
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ggiguash

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 6, 2026
@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

/test test-rebase

@ggiguash ggiguash changed the title OCPBUGS-66414: Fix cert-manager rebase to use per-platform images instead of multi-platform manifests OCPBUGS-66414: Fix cert-manager rebase to use per-platform images instead of multi-platform manifest lists Jan 6, 2026
@ggiguash ggiguash force-pushed the cert-manager-image-opt branch from 3c8ff9a to 0c7dd01 Compare January 6, 2026 15:34
@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

/test verify

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

Failed prometheus image pull with retries.
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

ggiguash commented Jan 6, 2026

/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc e2e-aws-tests

@pmtk
Copy link
Member

pmtk commented Jan 12, 2026

Have you tested the changes in the offline env?

There's assets/optional/cert-manager/manager/images.yaml file which contains references to images I think are manifest lists.
I think we might need to create versions of images.yaml for each arch and include correct one when building an RPM - something like we have for OLM (and other optional pkgs):

%ifarch %{arm} aarch64
cat assets/optional/operator-lifecycle-manager/kustomization.aarch64.yaml >> %{buildroot}/%{_prefix}/lib/microshift/manifests.d/001-microshift-olm/kustomization.yaml
%endif
%ifarch x86_64
cat assets/optional/operator-lifecycle-manager/kustomization.x86_64.yaml >> %{buildroot}/%{_prefix}/lib/microshift/manifests.d/001-microshift-olm/kustomization.yaml
%endif

Edit: what I mean by all this is, even if we package correct refs for mirroring/embedding for disconnected env, if the yaml has multiarch manifest digest, it'll attempt to pull that in order to get ref for its specific architecture.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 13, 2026

@ggiguash: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc 0c7dd01 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-arm 0c7dd01 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-arm
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests 0c7dd01 link true /test e2e-aws-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants