Harden Isogloss architecture, performance, and security - #7
Open
owengregson wants to merge 57 commits into
Open
Conversation
Design doc + runnable launch packet for an Opus 5 / Fable 5 parallel-workflow ideation campaign that forces novelty by construction: forbidden-solution lists, assumption inversion, cross-domain analogy seeding, and forced fusion. Scope is the whole next-gen tool (seven tracks); blue-sky generation with a separate feasibility/novelty tagging pass. Agent-facing prompts use neutral product/IP-protection framing. Plan only; the workflow is opt-in. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Dependency ReviewThe following issues were found:
License Issuesapps/web/package.json
OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Review baseline
This branch starts at PR 6 head commit 02c481d. The changes were driven by independent correctness/robustness, performance, and security audits, followed by adversarial post-fix verification.
Validation
Notable measured improvements