Skip to content

chore(docs): updated license badge - #1053

Closed
nirrozenbaum wants to merge 1 commit into
praxis-proxy:mainfrom
nirrozenbaum:license-badge
Closed

chore(docs): updated license badge#1053
nirrozenbaum wants to merge 1 commit into
praxis-proxy:mainfrom
nirrozenbaum:license-badge

Conversation

@nirrozenbaum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

license was updated from MIT to Apache 2.0, update license badge accordingly.

Which issue(s) does this relate to?

Fixes #

Checklist

  • Signed off all commits (git commit -s)
  • Tests added or updated
  • Documentation updated (if applicable)
  • make lint && make test passes locally

Does this introduce a breaking change?

no

@nirrozenbaum
nirrozenbaum requested a review from a team August 31, 2026 06:44
@nirrozenbaum
nirrozenbaum requested a review from shaneutt as a code owner August 31, 2026 06:44
@praxis-bot-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Commit message format: the following commits do not follow conventional commits:

  • 7ab660d: updated license badge

Expected format: type(scope): summary (max 72 chars). Types: build, chore, ci, docs, feat, fix, perf, refactor, test.

@nirrozenbaum nirrozenbaum changed the title updated license badge chore(docs): updated license badge Aug 31, 2026
Signed-off-by: Nir Rozenbaum <nrozenbaum@nvidia.com>
leseb
leseb previously requested changes Aug 31, 2026

@leseb leseb left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hum I'm wondering if we shouldn't remove the badge instead, since it's part of the README tab on GitHub anyway.

Thoughts?

Image

@nirrozenbaum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hum I'm wondering if we shouldn't remove the badge instead, since it's part of the README tab on GitHub anyway.

Thoughts?

Image

good question. it's a common practice to include the license badge on the main README.md (I've seen it in almost every CNCF project I looked at). in all those projects it's possible to see License on the sidebar and still most projects use the badge. so this is aligned with other CNCF projects.

of course, up to the maintainers of praxis. if you prefer to remove I can remove the badge :)

@leseb
leseb dismissed their stale review August 31, 2026 12:41

non blocking

@leseb

leseb commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hum I'm wondering if we shouldn't remove the badge instead, since it's part of the README tab on GitHub anyway.
Thoughts?
Image

good question. it's a common practice to include the license badge on the main README.md (I've seen it in almost every CNCF project I looked at). in all those projects it's possible to see License on the sidebar and still most projects use the badge. so this is aligned with other CNCF projects.

of course, up to the maintainers of praxis. if you prefer to remove I can remove the badge :)

fair enough :)

@nirrozenbaum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fixed in 2180d88

@nirrozenbaum
nirrozenbaum deleted the license-badge branch September 1, 2026 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants