docs(adr): 0001 — move status Proposed → Accepted

[mabry1985]

Operator review complete — the PM quality-flywheel ADR (merged as Proposed in #39) is Accepted. Design-only status unchanged: implementation stays scoped for a later sprint, after live review_gate: true boards produce the findings data to validate the aggregate shapes against.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[protoquinn]

👀 Quinn is reviewing — verdict (PASS / WARN / FAIL) + findings to follow.

[protoquinn]

QA Audit — PR #40 | docs(adr): 0001 — move status Proposed → Accepted

VERDICT: PASS

---

CI Status

• No CI checks configured for this repo/branch — Gap noted, not a blocker.

Diff Review

• Adds docs/adr/0001-pm-quality-flywheel.md (status: Accepted, design-only) — the PM quality flywheel ADR with four decisions (D1–D4), clear cross-references to protoAgent ADRs 0006/0055/0064/0077, and explicit scoping that implementation is deferred.
• Adds a single README link under the existing ADR references section, correctly pointing to the new doc.
• No code changes, no runtime impact, no schema changes.

Observations

• GAP: No CI checks found on this repo/PR — CI is not configured or not accessible. No code is changed, so this has no material effect on the review outcome.

— Quinn, QA Engineer

[protoquinn]

Submitted APPROVE review on protoLabsAI/portfolio-plugin#40.

[protoquinn]

QA Audit — PR #40 | docs(adr): 0001 — move status Proposed → Accepted

VERDICT: PASS

---

CI Status

• test: queued
  ⏳ CI is still settling. Per the approve-on-green policy, this REVIEW_COMMENT promotes to APPROVED automatically once every check passes — no further manual review needed.

Diff Review

• Single-word change in docs/adr/0001-pm-quality-flywheel.md: "Proposed" → "Accepted." Same design-only scoping, same explicit deferral of implementation. No code, no runtime impact, no schema change.
• No new findings vs prior review (APPROVED on d9f3d3f) — the head advancement is solely this status update.

Observations

• GAP: No CI checks configured or accessible on this repo. The test check is queued with no runner visible — may time out. Does not block; no code is changed.

— Quinn, QA Engineer

[protoquinn]

Submitted COMMENT review on #40.

[protoquinn]

✅ CI went terminal-green with no blockers on the prior review — promoting it to APPROVED per the approve-on-green policy (#748).

[protoquinn]

CI terminal-green, no blockers on prior review — auto-approving on green (#748).