chore: release v2.0.62

[mabry1985]

Automated version bump to v2.0.62. Review + merge through the normal CI/review gate, then dispatch release.yml (tag v2.0.62) to tag main and cut the release.

[protoquinn]

👀 Quinn is reviewing — verdict (PASS / WARN / FAIL) + findings to follow.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@mabry1985, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 31 minutes and 50 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a606492a-a5f3-4096-bf06-bf13a09db6dc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54c6a30 and 8a843ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pyproject.toml

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch prepare-release/v2.0.62

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[protoquinn]

QA Audit — PR #274 | chore: release v2.0.62

VERDICT: WARN (CI non-terminal — re-evaluating on completion)

---

CI Status

• Verify workspace config: queued
• Lint: in_progress

Diff Review

• Single-line version bump: 2.0.61 → 2.0.62 in pyproject.toml. No code, config, or logic changes.

Observations

• LOW: CI still running (2 checks). Formal PASS/FAIL deferred until terminal. No code concerns from the diff itself — pure version tag.

— Quinn, QA Engineer

[protoquinn]

Submitted COMMENT review on #274.

[protoquinn]

QA Audit — PR #274 | chore: release v2.0.62

VERDICT: FAIL

---

CI Status

• Build & Push Docker: skipped
• Test (3.11): failure ⛔
• Test (3.12): success
• Verify workspace config: success
• Lint: success

Diff Review

• Single-line version bump in pyproject.toml: 2.0.61 → 2.0.62. The change itself is trivially correct and safe.

Observations

• HIGH: Test (3.11) completed with failure. This blocks merge. If this is a flake unrelated to the version bump (Test 3.12 passed), re-run the failed job. If the failure is genuine, it must be fixed before the release can proceed.
• LOW: Build & Push Docker was skipped as a cascade from the test failure — not independently actionable.

— Quinn, QA Engineer

[protoquinn]

Submitted REQUEST_CHANGES review on protoLabsAI/protoPen#274.

The version bump itself is fine, but Test (3.11) failed terminally — re-run that job (likely a flake since 3.12 passed green) and re-request review once CI is clean.

[protoquinn]

Quinn QA Audit — PR #274 (release v2.0.62)

VERDICT: FAIL — CI test failure on Python 3.11

CI Status

• Build & Push Docker: skipped
• Test (3.11): failure — Test suite fails on Python 3.11
• Test (3.12): success
• Verify workspace config: success
• Lint: success

Analysis

The diff is a single-line version bump (2.0.61 → 2.0.62 in pyproject.toml). A version-only change should not cause test failures. The Python 3.11 test failure indicates a pre-existing issue on that Python version — this is consistent with INC-001 (protoPen main branch CI not green).

Action Required

1. Investigate and fix the Python 3.11 test failure — this blocks the release
2. If the 3.11 failure is a known non-blocking issue, document it and consider adjusting the CI matrix
3. Do not merge until Test (3.11) passes or is explicitly waived with rationale

[protoquinn]

Quinn Bug Triage — Closing as stale (not_planned)

This PR is stale (11 days, last updated June 23) with:

• Failing CI — Test (3.11) failure
• Changes requested on prior review
• Single-line version bump (2.0.61 → 2.0.62)

The Python 3.11 test failure appears to be a pre-existing issue (INC-001: protoPen main branch CI not green), not caused by this change. A version-only bump shouldn't need to fix unrelated CI failures.

Please reopen or recreate this release PR once the Python 3.11 CI issue is resolved.