Feature/azure oid backend

[stealthycole]

This is just a slightly modified version of the azure_tenant backend that uses OID instead of sub claim as the UID. Allows admins to more-safely switch to a version of Azure SSO that uses OID.

Issue: #684

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.64%. Comparing base (4765bae) to head (782eb7e).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
social_core/backends/azuread_oid.py	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.78%   77.64%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         352      353       +1     
  Lines       10865    10884      +19     
  Branches      489      489              
==========================================
  Hits         8451     8451              
- Misses       2234     2253      +19     
  Partials      180      180              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	77.64% <0.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[nijel]

Can you please add tests and documentation to https://github.com/python-social-auth/social-docs?

[stealthycole]

I've added the doc update here: python-social-auth/social-docs#309. I don't see tests in social-docs, but I do see test in social-core. However, there is no test file for azuread_tenant, which this is based on. Any advice?

[nijel]

You can probably base on social_core/tests/backends/test_azuread.py or social_core/tests/backends/test_azuread_b2c.py, but I have no clue how much they do differ.