[ExecuTorch][#10375] Add extension.BundledModule to Wrap extension.Module with Bundled Program Logic#10744
Merged
Merged
Conversation
….Module` with Bundled Program Logic Pull Request resolved: #10449 #10375 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. The issue is that `pybindings.PyModule` is dependent on the `method` getter from `pybindings.Module`, which `extension.Module` do not have. Since we don't want to expose `method` getter in `extension.Module`, we have to protect the getter, wrap the functions that is dependent on it and use the protected getter there, ultimately decouple `pybindings` from a `method` getter. # Proposal Now that we have a protected `method` getter, we can introduce an `extension.BundledModule`, a child class inheriting `extension.Module` which wraps up bundled program logic that is dependent on the `method` getter. We are also introducing ctests and a file-path-based factory function constructor. ghstack-source-id: 282374587 Differential Revision: [D73564125](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564125/)
pytorchbot
requested review from
Gasoonjia,
shoumikhin and
tarun292
as code owners
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10744
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Contributor
|
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing" |
zhenyan-zhang-meta
approved these changes
May 7, 2025
zhenyan-zhang-meta
added
release notes: devtools
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch.
ghstack PR number: #10449 by @zhenyan-zhang-meta
^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews
ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/zhenyan-zhang-meta/5/base
ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/zhenyan-zhang-meta/5/head
Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main
Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/zhenyan-zhang-meta/5/orig
@diff-train-skip-merge