Remove usages of 'to_edge_with_preserve_ops' #12471#12595
Merged
Conversation
Replace with to_edge. Differential Revision: [D78311705](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D78311705/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Differential Revision: D78311705 Pull Request resolved: #12471
1. Add `preserve_ops` to `EdgeCompileConfig` 2. Remove preserved ops from the decomposition table in `to_edge`. 3. Add checks to the verifier ensuring that preserved ops do not have mutations or views. 4. Update 'core_aten_exception_list' to be 'preserved_ops' in `to_edge_transform_and_lower`. Context/Usage **core_aten_ops_exception_list** - Contains operators that are missing a decomposition to core aten. - Exclude these so that verification can still be run on the rest of the graph. - Ideally, this list should be empty. **preserve_ops** - Contains operators that the user specifically does not want decomposed. - Must be aten; custom ops are ignored by verifier. Edge case: - If an aten operator does not have a decomp, and the user specifically wants it to be preserved, put it in preserve_ops rather than core_aten_ops_exception_list. Differential Revision: [D78298749](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D78298749/)
lucylq
requested review from
JacobSzwejbka,
cccclai,
larryliu0820 and
metascroy
as code owners
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/12595
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 4b83733 with merge base 4456407 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
meta-cla
Bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This PR needs a
|
lucylq
changed the title
SS-JIA
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2025
Replace with to_edge. Differential Revision: [D78311705](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D78311705/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
force-pushed
the
gh/lucylq/91/base
branch
from
0bc149f to
4b83733
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#12471
GH bot failed to create PR to main..