Including st_minimum_bounding_radius#99
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello everyone,
This PR implements
st_minimum_bounding_radius, a function that returns the center and radius of the minimum bounding circle for a geometry.Currently, users requiring only the circle parameters must generate the full polygon via
st_minimum_bounding_circle(with thest_bufferoverhead) and then post-process it to derive the circles' centroid and area. This implementation allows for direct, efficient retrieval of these parameters and matches the PostGIS ST_MinimumBoundingRadius function.I updated the documentation accordingly by documenting
st_minimum_bounding_radiusalongsidest_minimum_bounding_circle. Note that forsfgandsfcinputs, the function currently returns only the circles’ centers to maintain class consistency and a warning is issued in these cases to explain the behavior.I have not included any tests with the function because I was unsure about helpful tests in this case.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions or if fixes are needed to get this merged.
Cheers.