Skip to content

RDKOSS-871 : backporting of RDKOSS-617#84

Open
PreethiLakshmi91 wants to merge 1 commit intosupport/8.4.4.0from
RDKOSS-871_hotfix
Open

RDKOSS-871 : backporting of RDKOSS-617#84
PreethiLakshmi91 wants to merge 1 commit intosupport/8.4.4.0from
RDKOSS-871_hotfix

Conversation

@PreethiLakshmi91
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reason for change: message_filter is using wrong list to traverse Test Procedure:
Risks: Low
Priority: P1

Reason for change: message_filter is using wrong list to traverse
Test Procedure:
Risks: Low
Priority: P1

Signed-off-by: ppalan289 <preethi_palanisamy@comcast.com>
@PreethiLakshmi91 PreethiLakshmi91 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 13, 2026 06:50
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 13, 2026 06:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the BitBake/Yocto middleware IPK feed configuration, changing the release identifier and the artifact path used to construct IPK feed URIs for both standard and OSS middleware feeds.

Changes:

  • Updated RELEASE_NUM to RDKOSS-871_8I.
  • Switched middleware IPK feed base paths from middleware-rel/... to middleware-dbg/... for both standard and OSS feeds.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
conf/machine/include/middleware.inc Updates RELEASE_NUM and changes MW_IPK_PATH to use middleware-dbg/... when forming MW_IPK_SERVER_PATH / IPK_FEED_URIS.
conf/machine/include/oss_mw.inc Changes MW_OSS_IPK_PATH to use middleware-dbg/... when forming OSS middleware feed URIs.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +8 to +10
RELEASE_NUM = "RDKOSS-871_8I"

MW_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-rel/${RELEASE_NUM}"
MW_IPK_PATH ?= "middleware-dbg/${RELEASE_NUM}"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants