Added a new Security category and put PySpector as its first entry

[ParzivalHack]

Added a new category for cybersecurity projects called "Security", with the Python/Rust SAST tool i mantain under it, as the first entry :)

What are you adding?

• Project name: PySpector
• GitHub URL: https://github.com/ParzivalHack/PySpector
• Category: Security
• Description (one line): An High-Performance Python/Rust Graph-Based SAST Framework

Checklist

• The project is Python-related and has a meaningful Rust component
• The GitHub URL is correct and the project is actively maintained
• The entry follows the format: [name](url) - Description.
• The description starts with a capital letter and ends with a period
• The project is placed in the correct category
• No duplicate entry exists in the list

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a Security category to the contents list.
  • Added a Security section featuring PySpector.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 829e3c18-be63-477b-842f-583df94ef0c9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82b0267 and f9960d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README now includes a Security category in its contents list and lists PySpector in a new Security section.

Changes

Security documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add Security category and project entry README.md	The contents list links to a new Security section. The section lists PySpector.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the README changes by adding the Security category and listing PySpector first.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 152: Update the README project entry to use the proper name “PySpector”
and correct the article to “A High-Performance,” while preserving the existing
repository link and description.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 63759391-6582-485c-829d-e8317894fe79

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cd6dbb and 3d77a42.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

[ParzivalHack]

Hey @ritwiktiwari, should be fine now, lmk and thanks :))