fix: BarnetCouncil - rewrite for Jadu migration (Liferay/Granicus gone)#1943
fix: BarnetCouncil - rewrite for Jadu migration (Liferay/Granicus gone)#1943InertiaUK wants to merge 1 commit intorobbrad:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 29 minutes and 2 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Barnet moved off Liferay/Granicus and onto a Jadu-hosted form at myforms.barnet.gov.uk. The old scraper targeted endpoints that no longer exist.
The new form accepts a UPRN via POST and returns the schedule directly in the response HTML. The rewrite uses Selenium to submit the form (Jadu uses JS-heavy rendering) and parses the results table from the response.
Tested with a real UPRN in Barnet.