Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` by tisonkun · Pull Request #162621 · rust-lang/rust

tisonkun · 2026-09-11T02:43:38Z

Updated examples to clarify the role of non-Sync fields and the functionality of SyncView.

This refers to #98407

rustbot · 2026-09-11T02:43:44Z

rustbot has assigned @JohnTitor.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

Owners of files modified in this PR: libs
libs expanded to 12 candidates
Random selection from Darksonn, JohnTitor, Mark-Simulacrum

pthariensflame · 2026-09-11T03:24:11Z

 /// ```
 ///
-/// `SyncView` ensures the struct is `Sync` without stripping the future of its
+/// `SyncView` makes the struct `Sync` without stripping the struct of its


Suggested change

/// `SyncView` makes the struct `Sync` without stripping the struct of its

/// `SyncView` makes the value `Sync` without stripping the struct of its

View changes since the review

Adopted. But I wonder if there is some references to teach more English or Rust's terminology to decide between words?

tbh I do feel like struct or type is more accurate here. value refers to a specific instantiation of a struct/type whose Sync-ness is entirely dependent on the syncness of its type. And it applies here especially since the "struct" in this case is contrasting with the "struct" mentioned a few lines earlier

Yeah, perhaps the best phrasing for both correctness and stylistic clarity would be “SyncView makes the type Sync without stripping it of its functionality…”.

JohnTitor · 2026-09-11T11:15:42Z

@bors squash

@tisonkun

* Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`. * Apply suggestion from @tisonkun * Update library/core/src/sync/sync_view.rs Co-authored-by: Laine Taffin Altman <alexanderaltman@me.com>

rust-bors · 2026-09-11T11:16:05Z

🔨 3 commits were squashed into ea39610.

JohnTitor

Thanks! @bors r+ rollup

View changes since this review

rust-bors · 2026-09-11T11:16:28Z

📌 Commit ea39610 has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`. This refers to rust-lang#98407

JonathanBrouwer · 2026-09-11T13:41:53Z

💔 I suspect this PR failed tests as part of a rollup
@bors r-

After fixing the problem, consider running a try job for the failed job before re-approving.

Link to failure: #162636 (comment)

rust-bors · 2026-09-11T13:42:01Z

This pull request was unapproved.

This PR was contained in a rollup (#162636), which was unapproved.

View changes since this unapproval

tisonkun · 2026-09-11T13:49:20Z

Weird .. Let me see ..

tisonkun · 2026-09-11T13:54:27Z

Add ignore-wasm to the second example that uses thread::spawn. This follows how atomic.rs's example does.

This should work now. cc @JohnTitor @JonathanBrouwer

JonathanBrouwer · 2026-09-11T13:55:17Z

@bors try jobs=test-various

Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` try-job: test-various

rust-bors · 2026-09-11T16:06:42Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 24a3d70 (24a3d70870e3c8133d74346197944fa19fe23452)
Base parent: ada41e1 (ada41e1ce81819f01577c0ee40ccbd6fc41384e8)

JonathanBrouwer · 2026-09-11T16:12:23Z

@bors r=JohnTitor

rust-bors · 2026-09-11T16:12:26Z

📌 Commit f47f54d has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`. This refers to rust-lang#98407

…uwer Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #161413 (mir-transform: Remove `is_optimization_stage`) - #161430 (Re-export `core::fmt::NumBuffer` in `alloc` (and `std`)) - #162446 (Prevent `should-fail` to be used in `rustdoc-ui` testsuite) - #162621 (Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView`) - #162650 (Initialize mingw for all mingw targets) - #162651 (Remove needless test running instructions) - #162658 (Remove noras target docs mention)

Rollup merge of #162621 - tisonkun:patch-2, r=JohnTitor Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` Updated examples to clarify the role of non-`Sync` fields and the functionality of `SyncView`. This refers to #98407

rustbot assigned JohnTitor Sep 11, 2026

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 11, 2026

tisonkun mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2026

Tracking Issue for SyncView #98407

Open

10 tasks

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread library/core/src/sync/sync_view.rs Outdated

pthariensflame reviewed Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

joseph-gio approved these changes Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors Bot force-pushed the patch-2 branch from 3ab7a36 to ea39610 Compare September 11, 2026 11:16

JohnTitor approved these changes Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 11, 2026

JonathanBrouwer mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2026

Rollup of 5 pull requests #162636

Closed

rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 11, 2026

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread library/core/src/sync/sync_view.rs Outdated

Apply suggestion from @tisonkun

f47f54d

tisonkun requested a review from JohnTitor September 11, 2026 13:53

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 11, 2026

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2026

Auto merge of #162621 - tisonkun:patch-2, r=<try>

24a3d70

Clarify examples related to `Sync` and `SyncView` try-job: test-various

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 11, 2026

This was referenced Sep 11, 2026

Rollup of 8 pull requests #162659

Closed

Rollup of 7 pull requests #162664

Merged

rust-bors Bot merged commit 69e0636 into rust-lang:main Sep 11, 2026
14 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.100.0 milestone Sep 11, 2026

tisonkun deleted the patch-2 branch September 11, 2026 22:30

	/// `SyncView` makes the struct `Sync` without stripping the struct of its
	/// `SyncView` makes the value `Sync` without stripping the struct of its

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Conversation

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026 • edited by rustbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

Uh oh!

pthariensflame Sep 11, 2026 • edited by rustbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tisonkun Sep 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

joseph-gio Sep 11, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pthariensflame Sep 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

JohnTitor commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

JohnTitor left a comment • edited by rustbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

JonathanBrouwer commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

JonathanBrouwer commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

JonathanBrouwer commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

tisonkun commented Sep 11, 2026 •

edited by rustbot

Loading

pthariensflame Sep 11, 2026 •

edited by rustbot

Loading

joseph-gio Sep 11, 2026 •

edited

Loading

JohnTitor left a comment •

edited by rustbot

Loading