Skip to content

Conversation

@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #24745

The existing behavior is intended but unnecessarily restrictive.

@som-snytt
Copy link
Contributor Author

som-snytt commented Dec 16, 2025

This needs a tweak, as it "swaps" the implicit parameter, which is harmless but unintended. Edit: or maybe I'm misled by the way it's printed at typer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False "right-associative extension method cannot start with using clause" error

1 participant