Skip to content

Conversation

@nicolas2bert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

Hello nicolas2bert,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.27%. Comparing base (db448c4) to head (0994bb0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 80.20% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 80.96% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Ingestion 70.28% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 78.67% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 85.06% <ø> (ø)
Replication 58.48% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.0    #2704   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            74.26%   74.27%           
================================================
  Files                  202      202           
  Lines                13472    13472           
================================================
+ Hits                 10005    10006    +1     
+ Misses                3457     3456    -1     
  Partials                10       10           
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.45% <ø> (ø)
api:routes 9.26% <ø> (ø)
bucket-scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
ft_test:queuepopulator 10.74% <ø> (ø)
ingestion 12.51% <ø> (ø)
lib 7.47% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
lifecycle 18.65% <ø> (ø)
notification 1.04% <ø> (ø)
replication 18.50% <ø> (ø)
unit 50.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nicolas2bert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bert-e approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

Conflict

A conflict has been raised during the creation of
integration branch w/9.1/bugfix/BB-736/bump2 with contents from bugfix/BB-736/bump2
and development/9.1.

I have not created the integration branch.

Here are the steps to resolve this conflict:

 git fetch
 git checkout -B w/9.1/bugfix/BB-736/bump2 origin/development/9.1
 git merge origin/bugfix/BB-736/bump2
 # <intense conflict resolution>
 git commit
 git push -u origin w/9.1/bugfix/BB-736/bump2

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.1/bugfix/BB-736/bump2

The following options are set: approve

@nicolas2bert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bert-e approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jan 21, 2026

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

  • ✔️ development/9.2

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-736.

Goodbye nicolas2bert.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 0994bb0 into development/9.0 Jan 21, 2026
10 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/BB-736/bump2 branch January 21, 2026 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants