Skip to content

feat(gate): add machine-owned assurance envelopes - #451

Merged
screenleon merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feat/CC-512-assurance-envelope
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

feat(gate): add machine-owned assurance envelopes#451
screenleon merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feat/CC-512-assurance-envelope

Conversation

@screenleon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add a versioned machine-owned gate assurance envelope for tier, mode, pass kind, reviewer coverage, independence, and dispatch evidence
  • bind v2 assurance to the result digest, repository identity, base/head commits, subject fingerprint, protected attestation, and canonical terminal run records
  • preserve legacy v1 readability while reporting assurance as unavailable, and generate the copy-mode verifier fallback from the shared verifier
  • harden sidecar-first atomic publication and refresh the isolated profile fixtures for the new runtime dependencies and truthful parallel synthesis mode

Why

Gate Markdown previously mixed human reviewer findings with machine-consumed authorization claims. That made execution topology, coverage, evidence binding, and reviewer independence difficult to validate independently and fail closed.

Validation

  • Authoritative full suite: 97 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped
    • tests/bin/run-all-tests.sh --result-file /tmp/cc512-full-result-current.json
  • Full-result verification: authoritative PASS on HEAD 48808e3
    • tests/bin/run-tests.sh --verify-full /tmp/cc512-full-result-current.json
  • Profile fixture regression: 13 passed, 0 failed
    • bash tests/shell/test-pr-gate-profile.sh
  • Formal PR gate: GO, full tier, machine assurance verified
    • gate-20260727-060030-ab15f8

Sequential remains the default gate mode; parallel remains an explicit opt-in topology.

@screenleon
screenleon marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 07:01
@screenleon
screenleon merged commit 4933840 into main Jul 27, 2026
57 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant