Skip to content

Conversation

@rwedge
Copy link
Contributor

@rwedge rwedge commented Jan 22, 2026

Resolve #1068

@rwedge rwedge requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2026 17:35
@rwedge rwedge requested review from gsheni and removed request for a team January 22, 2026 17:35
@rwedge rwedge requested a review from fealho January 22, 2026 17:35
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (feb0168) to head (6a841b6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1069   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           19        19           
  Lines         2644      2644           
=========================================
  Hits          2644      2644           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 83.47% <ø> (ø)
unit 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rwedge rwedge merged commit 643d264 into main Jan 22, 2026
110 checks passed
@rwedge rwedge deleted the issue-1068-pin-pandas branch January 22, 2026 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pin Pandas dependency below 3.0

4 participants