🧪 [testing improvement] Add error path tests for WebSocketHelper

[sebamar88]

🎯 What: Added tests for missing error paths in WebSocketHelper.
📊 Coverage:

• Registered multiple handlers and verified that if one throws an error, subsequent handlers are still executed.
• Threw a non-Error value (a string) from a handler and verified that it is correctly wrapped into an Error object by notifyError.
  ✨ Result: Improved reliability and coverage for the WebSocket message handling logic.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 10745326257403051512 started by @sebamar88

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud