chore(just): forge-note recipe — file upstream-port issues on rust-forge-template#550
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
just forge-note "<title>" "<body>"": files an issue on skyllc-ai/rust-forge-template with theupstream-port` label, a backlink to the current UFFS commit, and a genericize/apply/verify checklist.This is the UFFS side of the template-sync discipline: when a scaffolding change here (lints, gates, workflows, hooks, policies) is generic, one command tells the template repo instead of letting it drift. No mechanical sync by design — ports stay curated, and the template's own gates prove them.
Recipe-only change (just/workflow.just); full 23-gate pre-push battery green.