refactor: use contains() for membership checks - #16
Open
smaheshwar-pltr wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
smaheshwar-pltr wants to merge 1 commit into
smaheshwar-pltr wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
smaheshwar-pltr
force-pushed
the
cleanup/use-contains
branch
from
September 6, 2026 22:05
044dba5 to
8f2c4a2
Compare
smaheshwar-pltr
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 7, 2026 01:07
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace five iterator-only membership checks with C++20
contains()in metadata columns, table metadata, content-file utilities, andStructLikeSet. Lookups that use the resulting iterator are unchanged.Validation:
pre-commitpassed for the complete diff.AI assistance: Codex was used to rebase the existing cleanup and account for current-main changes. I reviewed the resulting diff and validation.