Non-blocking concerns raised while reviewing PR #121 (docs: correct the whole-repo fallback measurement to zero).
None of these blocked the merge. They are batched into one issue so a
review's findings stay one unit of attention rather than 1 separate
tracking issues; tick items off as they are addressed, and close this issue
when the list is done or the remaining items are judged not worth doing.
Non-blocking concerns raised while reviewing PR #121 (docs: correct the whole-repo fallback measurement to zero).
None of these blocked the merge. They are batched into one issue so a
review's findings stay one unit of attention rather than 1 separate
tracking issues; tick items off as they are addressed, and close this issue
when the list is done or the remaining items are judged not worth doing.
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-09-10-backlog-evaluation.md — describes line 141 of the standards-check workflow)The corrected document states that line 141's warning is emitted with the base-SHA fetch's stderr discarded via
2>/dev/null, so a genuine future fetch failure would report that it happened but never why. The document explicitly calls this "worth fixing on its own merits, not as a W3 blocker," so it does not gate this merge. Suggested action: track a follow-up to capture and surface the fetch stderr in the warning. This is the document's own claim about workflow source, not a claim I verified.