Skip to content

📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Enforce Numeric Family Validation in Vector Operations - #612

Merged
claycuy merged 1 commit into
feat/math-stfrom
coderabbitai/chat/9bedc39
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

claycuy merged 1 commit into
feat/math-stfrom
coderabbitai/chat/9bedc39

Conversation

@coderabbitai

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code changes was requested by @claycuy.

The following files were modified:

  • rust/src/instructions/math/vector/cross_func.rs
  • rust/src/instructions/math/vector/dot_func.rs
  • rust/src/instructions/math/vector/normalize_func.rs

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
lightvm Ready Ready Preview Sep 15, 2026 7:10am UTC

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Important

Review skipped

This PR was authored by the user configured for CodeRabbit reviews. CodeRabbit does not review PRs authored by this user. It's recommended to use a dedicated user account to post CodeRabbit review feedback.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: 1e364cdc-b386-4b39-92b3-ffeeca1dc8ac

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 15, 2026
@claycuy
claycuy merged commit c03fa61 into feat/math-st Sep 15, 2026
5 checks passed
@claycuy
claycuy deleted the coderabbitai/chat/9bedc39 branch September 15, 2026 07:11
claycuy added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2026
* feat: Tighten the number type rules on math opcodes

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Reject Floating-Point Operands in Integer Arithmetic Opcodes (#597)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Enforce Numeric Type Validation for Power and Trigonometric Opcodes (#599)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Accept All Floating-Point Variants for Math Operations (#600)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Tighten Type Validation for Bitwise and EXP Opcodes (#601)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Standardize TypeMismatch Found-Type Messages Across Math Opcodes (#606)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Restore Numeric Error Display Names and Validation Tests (#608)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Validate numeric families in vector arithmetic opcodes (#609)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Enforce float-family validation in logarithm opcodes (#610)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor: Clean up source code

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Reject Integer Operands for Float Arithmetic and Root Operations (#611)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Enforce Numeric Family Validation in Vector Operations (#612)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Enforce Float Validation for Scalar and Vector Trigonometry (#613)

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant