Skip to content

[AI] Improve imix portal code coverage - Low Effort#1798

Open
hulto wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
improve-portal-coverage-13486911758597024725
Open

[AI] Improve imix portal code coverage - Low Effort#1798
hulto wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
improve-portal-coverage-13486911758597024725

Conversation

@hulto
Copy link
Collaborator

@hulto hulto commented Feb 13, 2026

Improved code coverage for realm/implants/imix/src/portal by adding a comprehensive test suite in implants/imix/src/tests/portal_tests.rs. The new tests cover Bytes, TCP, and UDP handlers, as well as the main coordination loop and ordered reader logic. All 39 imix tests (including the 10 new ones) pass.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13486911758597024725 started by @hulto

Added comprehensive unit tests for the portal module in imix, including:
- Bytes handler (Ping, Keepalive, Trace, Unspecified)
- TCP handler (connection, read, write)
- UDP handler (connection, read, write)
- Main portal loop (registration, trace handling, dynamic dispatch)
- Ordered delivery verification

This significantly improves the test coverage for the portal submodules to well above the 70% target.

Co-authored-by: hulto <7121375+hulto@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
2594    ±0 2594    ±0 0    ±0 0    ±0 0    ±0 0    ±0 1ms    ±0

Previous Results

Build 🏗️ Result 🧪 Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
#953 2594 2594 0 0 0 0 16.7s

Insights

Average Tests per Run Total Flaky Tests Total Failed Slowest Test (p95)
2594 0 0 5.4s

Slowest Tests

Test 📝 Results 📊 Duration (avg) ⏱️ Duration (p95) ⏱️
eldritch-libsys: std::dll_inject_impl::tests::test_dll_inject_simple 1 5.4s 5.4s
imix::bin/imix: install::tests::test_install_execution 3 1.2s 3.5s
imix::bin/imix: install::tests::test_install_execution 3 1.2s 3.5s
imix::bin/imix: install::tests::test_install_execution 3 1.2s 3.5s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_output 3 3.0s 3.0s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_output 3 3.0s 3.0s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_output 3 3.0s 3.0s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_error 3 3.0s 3.0s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_error 3 3.0s 3.0s
imix::bin/imix: tests::task_tests::test_task_streaming_error 3 3.0s 3.0s

🎉 No failed tests in this run. | 🍂 No flaky tests in this run.

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

🔄 This comment has been updated

- Added comprehensive unit tests for Bytes, TCP, and UDP handlers.
- Added integration tests for the main portal loop (run::run).
- Verified ordered delivery with out-of-order packets.
- Ensured formatting compliance with cargo fmt.

Coverage for realm/implants/imix/src/portal is now well above 70%.

Co-authored-by: hulto <7121375+hulto@users.noreply.github.com>
@hulto hulto changed the title Improve imix portal code coverage [AI] Improve imix portal code coverage - Low Effort Feb 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant