pin GitHub Actions to commit SHA

[sobhe-Starkware]

TITLE

Description

Description of the pull request changes and motivation.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

---

This change is 

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.929 s ±  0.017 s    [User: 24.427 s, System: 0.497 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.917 s … 24.942 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     24.862 s ±  0.045 s    [User: 24.367 s, System: 0.490 s]
  Range (min … max):   24.830 s … 24.893 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.385 s ±  0.036 s    [User: 24.563 s, System: 0.493 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.360 s … 13.411 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     13.386 s ±  0.014 s    [User: 24.542 s, System: 0.532 s]
  Range (min … max):   13.376 s … 13.396 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.963 s ±  0.370 s    [User: 36.663 s, System: 0.642 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.701 s … 10.225 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.143 s ±  0.011 s    [User: 36.011 s, System: 0.634 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.135 s … 10.151 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.02 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.765 s ±  0.068 s    [User: 36.638 s, System: 0.652 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.717 s …  9.813 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.849 s ±  0.047 s    [User: 36.679 s, System: 0.691 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.815 s …  9.882 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.912 s ±  0.061 s    [User: 37.029 s, System: 0.688 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.869 s …  9.955 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.785 s ±  0.200 s    [User: 36.838 s, System: 0.676 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.644 s …  9.926 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.967 s ±  0.064 s    [User: 37.212 s, System: 0.692 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.922 s … 10.012 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.897 s ±  0.187 s    [User: 37.064 s, System: 0.727 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.765 s … 10.029 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.247 ± 0.008	2.241	2.262	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_factorial	2.247 ± 0.031	2.227	2.316	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.179 ± 0.039	2.150	2.284	1.00 ± 0.02
head big_fibonacci	2.173 ± 0.029	2.143	2.220	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.623 ± 0.097	7.520	7.824	1.00 ± 0.01
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.609 ± 0.053	7.544	7.698	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.300 ± 0.019	2.278	2.338	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.294 ± 0.011	2.274	2.309	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.494 ± 0.011	1.481	1.511	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.501 ± 0.012	1.488	1.518	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.263 ± 0.008	1.255	1.275	1.00 ± 0.01
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.262 ± 0.012	1.250	1.281	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.761 ± 0.067	7.673	7.881	1.00 ± 0.01
head integration_builtins	7.725 ± 0.059	7.656	7.825	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.850 ± 0.069	7.740	7.938	1.01 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.798 ± 0.043	7.721	7.872	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.282 ± 0.010	2.270	2.304	1.00
head linear_search	2.284 ± 0.015	2.270	2.319	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.586 ± 0.044	1.556	1.703	1.00 ± 0.04
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.586 ± 0.041	1.563	1.699	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.545 ± 0.011	1.535	1.572	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.543 ± 0.005	1.536	1.550	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.294 ± 0.006	1.285	1.304	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.304 ± 0.015	1.286	1.341	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.627 ± 0.005	1.617	1.638	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.636 ± 0.009	1.626	1.659	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	565.2 ± 3.4	561.5	570.6	1.00
head pedersen	570.0 ± 6.5	563.9	587.1	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	666.7 ± 3.3	661.0	671.8	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	667.4 ± 7.4	660.4	686.3	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.937 ± 0.010	1.927	1.960	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.945 ± 0.009	1.932	1.959	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	697.1 ± 25.0	680.6	746.2	1.02 ± 0.04
head set_integration_benchmark	686.0 ± 2.6	681.2	688.9	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.358 ± 0.038	4.315	4.434	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.521 ± 0.499	4.325	5.937	1.04 ± 0.11

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.21%. Comparing base (d26a502) to head (e0bc749).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2388   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.21%   96.21%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines       37925    37925           
=======================================
  Hits        36490    36490           
  Misses       1435     1435           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.