Add new protocol Home Easy 64 bits#179
Open
apiel wants to merge 1 commit intosui77:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
|
Duplicate of #124? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi guys,
I spent some time to integrate a new protocol commonly use in RF smart device in Europe. You can find some details about this protocol there:
https://playground.arduino.cc/Code/HomeEasy
This protocol use a 64 bits code, so I had to make some refactoring in order to don't break the current possible value of max 32 bits. So I decided to use WordCode in favor of decimal value as reference and only convert this code to decimal on the getter function. Also some device don't support completely 64 bit integer, so we couldn't change the nReceivedValue to unsigned long long:
http://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?t=2265
This protocol use a second syncFactor before to start to send the binary code, I called it latch.
Enjoy and I am looking forward your feedback,
KR.
Alex