Skip to content

ci: CodeQL, split secret-scan workflow, status badges - #8

Merged
sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/claude/security-visibility
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

ci: CodeQL, split secret-scan workflow, status badges#8
sumitake merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dev/claude/security-visibility

Conversation

@sumitake

@sumitake sumitake commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes the security-visibility gaps:

  • CodeQL: weekly + per-PR Python analysis, adapted from the Portable-GHAR house template (pinned action SHAs, minimal permissions)
  • secret-scan split into its own workflow so it gets a distinct badge; job name unchanged, so the branch-protection required check is unaffected
  • README badges: ci, CodeQL, secret-scan, license
  • (Applied directly via API, not in this PR: GitHub native secret scanning + push protection are now enabled on the repo — Security tab)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@sumitake
sumitake merged commit 79b3530 into main Aug 4, 2026
4 checks passed
@sumitake
sumitake deleted the dev/claude/security-visibility branch August 4, 2026 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants