Skip to content

Conversation

@sainathek1999
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:
    • The student has a good understanding of binary search and its variations.
    • The code is clean, well-commented, and easy to follow.
    • The solutions are efficient and handle edge cases correctly.
  • Areas for Improvement:
    • For problem1.java, the student could consider adding a check at the beginning to handle the case where the array is empty, although the current implementation will handle it correctly by returning {-1, -1}.
    • For problem3.java, the student could add a comment explaining why the loop condition is low < high instead of low <= high, as this might not be immediately obvious to all readers.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Strengths:

    • The student has a clear understanding of binary search and its applications.
    • The code is well-commented and easy to follow.
    • The solutions are efficient and meet the required time and space complexities.
    • The student has successfully implemented variations of binary search for different problems.
  2. Areas for Improvement:

    • While the solutions are correct, the student could consider adding edge case checks (e.g., empty array in problem1.java) to make the code more robust.
    • The comments could be slightly more detailed to explain the reasoning behind certain decisions (e.g., why low < high instead of low <= high in problem2.java and problem3.java).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants