Lagrange multiplier graphs for Becca to look at

[rebeccamccabe]

If a constraint is active for certain designs, then that constraint has a non-zero lagrange multiplier for certain other designs. The problem is that the designs that have active constraints are not necessarily the designs that have the non-zero lagrange multipliers.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.52941% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.43%. Comparing base (49bee41) to head (fcf6f12).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head fcf6f12 differs from pull request most recent head 152fd8a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 152fd8a to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
mdocean/optimization/gradient_optim.m	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #41      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.69%   79.43%   +0.74%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines        1577     1634      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits         1241     1298      +57     
  Misses        336      336              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rebeccamccabe]

Outside loop: color_cell = { '.r', 'or', etc ... }
color = color_cell{ rem(j,14) }

[rebeccamccabe]

for the most part, which constraints are active is consistent between the two ways of plotting, but the number on the x-axis is not consistent.

[rebeccamccabe]

First count number of constraints and get confident on whether it's a reordering issue on the x-axis or some other issue in computation. If it's a reordering issue, look in the generator folder and see if there's a way that the constraints are getting reordered.