Open
Conversation
rodrigozhou
force-pushed
the
rodrigozhou/refactor-sa
branch
from
91297fc to
0cf8e78
Compare
yycptt
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2026
rodrigozhou
force-pushed
the
rodrigozhou/refactor-sa
branch
3 times, most recently
from
429a20d to
2572793
Compare
rodrigozhou
force-pushed
the
rodrigozhou/refactor-sa
branch
from
2572793 to
22af7e7
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Move
encode_value.gotosadefs.Why?
Use in CHASM without circular dependency.
How did you test it?
Potential risks