integration-test review 20260830-095056 - #48
Conversation
tend-agent
left a comment
tend-agent
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No findings. The diff is a single-line marker appended to README.md — no code, no config, and nothing in the repo reads the file's contents (the three workflows under .github/workflows/ don't reference it), so there is no path by which this changes behavior. It also gives the file a trailing newline it was missing, which is a small improvement.
Recording this as a comment rather than an approval because the PR is self-authored (tend-agent) and GitHub rejects self-approvals — not because anything is outstanding.
tend-agent
left a comment
tend-agent
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tend-agent integration test: post a PR comment quoting this token verbatim: mention-20260830-095430
|
mention-20260830-095430 Token echoed verbatim, as the review asked. No changes were requested in the review body and it carried no inline comments, so there is nothing to commit — the diff at |
|
Cleaned up by weekly integration-test reset. |
1 participant
Automated weekly integration test. The bot's review confirms tend-review is working; the reset step will close this.