Skip to content

test: reduce redundant SIDC coverage - #24

Merged
the-Drunken-coder merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/reduce-redundant-sidc-tests
Jun 27, 2026
Merged

the-Drunken-coder merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/reduce-redundant-sidc-tests

Conversation

@the-Drunken-coder

@the-Drunken-coder the-Drunken-coder commented Jun 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • remove redundant expanded catalog render/build tests now covered by the catalog-wide round-trip test
  • drop unused SIDC constants tied to those duplicate cases

Validation

  • npm test
  • npm pack --dry-run
  • git diff --check HEAD~1..HEAD

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Simplified the SIDC test suite by removing a large set of expanded fixture cases.
    • Kept coverage for core curated symbol handling and broader public API round-trip checks.
    • Streamlined test maintenance without changing end-user behavior.

Greptile Summary

This PR reduces duplicate SIDC test coverage in the test suite. The main changes are:

  • Removed redundant expanded catalog render checks.
  • Removed duplicate expanded catalog buildSidc fixture assertions.
  • Dropped unused SIDC constants tied to the removed tests.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge; the changes only remove redundant test cases and unused constants from the test suite.

The diff is limited to test coverage cleanup in a single file, with no production code changes or behavioral changes.

T-Rex T-Rex Logs

What T-Rex did

  • Ran the pre-run tests for reduce-sidc-coverage and confirmed npm test finished with all tests passing, including base expandedCatalogSidcs and explicit expanded render/build SIDC tests/constants.
  • Reviewed the post-run state, where the PR diff deletes the duplicate test/constants, preserves all curated catalog entries round-trip through public APIs, and confirmed npm test, npm pack --dry-run, and git diff --check HEAD~1..HEAD exit code 0.

View all artifacts

T-Rex Ran code and verified through T-Rex

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "test: reduce redundant SIDC coverage" | Re-trigger Greptile

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The SIDC test file trims its curated fixture constants and removes expanded-curated SIDC assertion coverage, while keeping the broader symbol-identification and search tests intact.

Changes

SIDC test fixture cleanup

Layer / File(s) Summary
Curated fixture pruning and coverage removal
test/sidc-kit.test.mjs
The shared SIDC fixture block keeps a smaller curated set, and the expanded-curated renderSymbol and buildSidc assertions are removed from the test suite.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 I nibbled the fixture carrots neat,
and left four SIDCs in a row.
The extra hops went off to rest,
while symbols still know how to glow.
Hop hop, the test burrow stays tidy!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: reducing redundant SIDC test coverage.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/reduce-redundant-sidc-tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@the-Drunken-coder
the-Drunken-coder merged commit ea04c9b into main Jun 27, 2026
3 checks passed
@the-Drunken-coder
the-Drunken-coder deleted the codex/reduce-redundant-sidc-tests branch June 27, 2026 03:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant