Skip to content

docs: add Chakra UI + OpenUI component-surface article#54

Open
rivet-ops wants to merge 1 commit into
thesysdev:mainfrom
rivet-ops:article/openui-chakra-contracts
Open

docs: add Chakra UI + OpenUI component-surface article#54
rivet-ops wants to merge 1 commit into
thesysdev:mainfrom
rivet-ops:article/openui-chakra-contracts

Conversation

@rivet-ops
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Addresses #2 with a written article on using OpenUI with Chakra UI through a constrained, product-level component surface rather than exposing raw design-system primitives.

The article focuses on:

  • keeping Chakra responsible for theme, spacing, variants, and accessibility defaults
  • registering small OpenUI component contracts with Zod schemas
  • avoiding arbitrary model-generated Chakra primitive trees
  • validating generated actions before they reach application code
  • testing generated UI fixtures across desktop/mobile and action payload boundaries

This is intentionally framed as a production boundary/architecture pattern for design-system-aware generative UI, not a broad OpenUI introduction.

Verification

Notes

There are existing submissions for the same issue. This draft is differentiated around the “small surface area” pattern: hiding Chakra primitives behind typed product-level components so OpenUI can adapt the interface without letting the model freestyle the design system.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vishxrad vishxrad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rivet-ops thanks for the submission. A few concerns before this can be a contender: the writing reads as heavily AI-generated, there are no screenshots or screen recordings demonstrating the components in action, and the account/PR pattern resembles automated submissions we're seeing on this issue. For the program, we're looking for articles in the author's own voice with real visual demos of working code. Happy to take another look on a revision.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants