Add article: five AI answers that should be interfaces

[Robertg761]

/attempt #5

Summary

• Adds a developer-facing article for issue Written Content: 5 Things That Look Terrible as Plain Text (And How OpenUI Fixes Them) #5.
• Frames the plain-text problem around lost state, evidence, actions, and reviewability rather than only visual polish.
• Uses five distinct before/after examples: incident triage, data reconciliation, release readiness, approval queues, and multi-option decisions.

Validation

• git diff --check
• Word count: 1,594 words

Transparency

AI-assisted with Codex; reviewed and validated before submission.

[Robertg761]

Follow-up improvement pushed in f7594f4: added an original SVG visual to frame the article's core plain-text-vs-interface argument, plus a short paragraph tying the diagram to evidence, state, actions, and decision boundaries.\n\nValidation: xmllint --noout assets/text-to-interface-review-loop.svg; git diff --check.

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

---

Confidence Score: 5/5 - Safe to Merge

Safe to merge — this PR adds a new article titled 'five AI answers that should be interfaces' with no functional code changes, logic modifications, or security-sensitive modifications involved. The heuristic analysis returned zero issues at any severity level, and no review comments were generated during the automated review pass. Content-only additions of this nature carry minimal risk to the codebase.

Key Findings:

• No code logic, runtime behavior, or security-sensitive paths are modified — this is a purely additive content PR introducing a new article.
• Automated heuristic analysis identified zero critical, significant, or medium-severity issues across all scanned files.
• No pre-existing unresolved comments or carryover concerns from prior reviews were found associated with this PR.