-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
SQL Server adapter: update parameters for latest version of sqlcmd #133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They're not legacy, keep them as is, and fix your additions to match. See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/connect/jdbc/setting-the-connection-properties?view=sql-server-ver16#properties.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah now I understand the naming ( I thought that parameters were derived from sqlcmd --help ) - but at least for
secureparameter which is supposed to beencryptthere was changeDo you want to keep
securea boolean parameter andencryptas string parameter or there should be just one parameter and type of value will be detected ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since
-Ndoesn't accept a string, and thus there's no way for us to do anything withencrypt=strict, I think we should just leave it as is for now?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is actually one of the reasons why I started this pull request - I am using latest
sqlcmd:and I cannot use
-Nas boolean parameter because it was changedThe idea was that I would add parameter while keeping old one so that the adapter is not broken for people with older version of
sqlcmd.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I rebased the PR and one more thing to note is that
encryptandtrustServerCertificateare properties of connection according to specification butformat,column-separatorandtrim-spacesare options ofsqlcmdclient.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, yeah, those have no business being in a URL. URLs specify how to connect to the database, not arbitrary command-line flags. There have been multiple requests of this nature lately (#129, #125) so I think we should add some sort of general interface for that.
As for
-N, I'm pushing a fix to support-Non?encrypt=1and a string argument for anything else.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sounds good, thanks.