Skip to content

Fix tolerance read-in for optimzation parameters - #176

Merged
andrewwinters5000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tol-readin
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

andrewwinters5000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
tol-readin

Conversation

@andrewwinters5000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Use doublePrecisionValueForKey instead of realValueForKey to read-in the tolerance value.

@andrewwinters5000 andrewwinters5000 added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 14, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.25%. Comparing base (863852d) to head (0e1f097).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #176   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.25%   78.25%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines       12387    12387           
  Branches        2        2           
=======================================
  Hits         9693     9693           
  Misses       2694     2694           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.25% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andrewwinters5000
andrewwinters5000 merged commit 4722940 into main Aug 15, 2026
23 checks passed
@andrewwinters5000
andrewwinters5000 deleted the tol-readin branch August 15, 2026 18:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant